Background Gaucher disease is the first lysosomal storage disease for which specific therapy became available. Over 4800 patients have been treated with enzyme replacement therapy. Analysis of Gaucher disease registry data has outlined the clinical heterogeneity of the disease and the different responses to treatment from patient to patient, and for different organs. This variability in clinical response justifies the development of a severity score index to assess disease activity, stage and prognosis, and to quantify the effects of treatment. Design and Methods The new scoring system proposed here, the “Gaucher Disease Severity Score Index – Type I” (GauSSI-I), is based on the clinical experience of the authors and an extensive literature review, including data from the International Gaucher Registry. In particular for skeletal disease, all the available scoring systems have been reviewed and compared in order to provide a skeletal scoring system that allows use of any of the different methods on an equivalent basis. Results The new scoring system, GauSSI-I, was developed. Six specific domains, in which different items were scored according to their impact on morbidity, were characterized. GauSSI-I was evaluated in 53 type I Gaucher patients treated with imiglucerase, and it was compared to the Zimran score, the only severity index score so far available. Conclusions The GauSSI-I is a reliable method for staging the severity of adult type I Gaucher disease, and it is more sensitive than the Zimran score for monitoring the response to treatment.
The rates of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylation (the first and rate-limiting step of bile acid synthesis from cholesterol) were evaluated in vivo in patients administered bile acids with different structural properties, cholestyramine or simvastatin, a competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. Twenty-three subjects, with normal hepatic and intestinal functions, were studied in basal conditions and after one of the following treatment schedules, lasting 4 to 6 weeks: cholestyramine, 4 and 12 gm/day (four patients); ursodeoxycholic acid, 9 to 11 mg/kg/day (four patients); chenodeoxycholic acid, 12 to 15 mg/kg/day (five patients); deoxycholic acid, 8 to 10 mg/kg/day (four patients); and simvastatin, 40 mg/day (six patients). 7α-Hydroxylation of cholesterol was assayed by measuring the increase in body water tritium after intravenous bolus of cholesterol tritiated at the 7α position. Plasma bile acid composition, evaluated by gas-liquid chromatography, revealed a substantial enrichment of the recirculating pool by the administered bile acid, whereas treatment with cholestyramine decreased the content of dihydroxylated bile acids. Cholesterol 7α-hydroxylation increased in a dose-related manner after cholestyramine, in parallel with a decrease of cholesterol in total plasma and low-density lipoproteins (1.006 to 1.063 gm/ml). Hydroxylation rates decreased by an average of 47% with chenodeoxycholic acid and by an average of 78% with deoxycholic acid; ursodeoxycholic acid treatment did not affect 7α-hydroxylation significantly. Simvastatin markedly reduced plasma total and low-density lipoproteincholesterol but exerted no change on 7α-hydroxylation rates. Our results support the existence of a feedback inhibition exerted on cholesterol 7α-hydroxylation (and consequently on bile acid synthesis) by hydrophobic bile acids returning to the liver through the enterohepatic circulation. The finding emphasizes the importance of the physicochemical properties of bile acids in the regulation of hepatic cholesterol balance. Under these experimental conditions, inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and presumably reduced availability of newly synthesized cholesterol are not critical for bile acid synthesis. (Hepatology 1991;14:830-837).