Tuong L. Nguyen

Dr. Tuong L. Nguyen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 February 2018 in Clinical Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShuai Li
Shuai Li
EWEe Ming Wong
Ee Ming Wong
MBMinh Bui
Minh Bui
TNTuong L. Nguyen
Tuong L. Nguyen
JJJi-Hoon Eric Joo
Ji-Hoon Eric Joo
JHJohn Hopper
John Hopper
Smoking has been reported to be associated with peripheral blood DNA methylation, but the causal aspects of the association have rarely been investigated. We aimed to investigate the association and underlying causation between smoking and blood methylation. The methylation profile of DNA from the peripheral blood, collected as dried blood spots stored on Guthrie cards, was measured for 479 Australian women including 66 monozygotic twin pairs, 66 dizygotic twin pairs, and 215 sisters of twins from 130 twin families using the Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip array. Linear regression was used to estimate associations between methylation at ~ 410,000 cytosine-guanine dinucleotides (CpGs) and smoking status. A regression-based methodology for twins, Inference about Causation through Examination of Familial Confounding (ICE FALCON), was used to assess putative causation. At a 5% false discovery rate, 39 CpGs located at 27 loci, including previously reported AHRR, F2RL3, 2q37.1 and 6p21.33, were found to be differentially methylated across never, former and current smokers. For all 39 CpG sites, current smokers had the lowest methylation level. Our study provides the first replication for two previously reported CpG sites, cg06226150 (SLC2A4RG) and cg21733098 (12q24.32). From the ICE FALCON analysis with smoking status as the predictor and methylation score as the outcome, a woman’s methylation score was associated with her co-twin’s smoking status, and the association attenuated towards the null conditioning on her own smoking status, consistent with smoking status causing changes in methylation. To the contrary, using methylation score as the predictor and smoking status as the outcome, a woman’s smoking status was not associated with her co-twin’s methylation score, consistent with changes in methylation not causing smoking status. For middle-aged women, peripheral blood DNA methylation at several genomic locations is associated with smoking. Our study suggests that smoking has a causal effect on peripheral blood DNA methylation, but not vice versa.

22 October 2020 in Clinical Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShuai Li
Shuai Li
TNTuong L. Nguyen
Tuong L. Nguyen
EWEe Ming Wong
Ee Ming Wong
PDPierre-Antoine Dugué
Pierre-Antoine Dugué
GDGillian S. Dite
Gillian S. Dite
JHJohn Hopper
John Hopper
Background: DNA methylation-based biological age (DNAm age) is an important biomarker for adult health. Studies in specific age ranges have found widely varying results about its genetic and environmental causes of variation. However, these studies are not able to provide a comprehensive view of the causes of variation over the lifespan. Results: In order to investigate the genetic and environmental causes of DNAm age variation across the lifespan, we pooled genome-wide DNA methylation data for 4217 people aged 0–92 years from 1871 families. DNAm age was calculated using the Horvath epigenetic clock. We estimated familial correlations in DNAm age for monozygotic (MZ) twin, dizygotic (DZ) twin, sibling, parent–offspring, and spouse pairs by cohabitation status. Genetic and environmental variance components models were fitted and compared. We found that twin pair correlations were − 0.12 to 0.18 around birth, not different from zero (all P > 0.29). For all pairs of relatives, their correlations increased with time spent living together (all P < 0.02) at different rates (MZ > DZ and siblings > parent–offspring; P < 0.001) and decreased with time spent living apart (P = 0.02) at similar rates. These correlation patterns were best explained by cohabitation-dependent shared environmental factors, the effects of which were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 1.66) times greater for MZ pairs than for DZ and sibling pairs, and the latter were 2.03 (95% CI 1.13 to 9.47) times greater than for parent–offspring pairs. Genetic factors explained 13% (95% CI − 10 to 35%) of variation (P = 0.27). Similar results were found for another two epigenetic clocks, suggesting that our observations are robust to how DNAm age is measured. In addition, results for the other clocks were consistent with there also being a role for prenatal environmental factors in determining their variation. Conclusions: Variation in DNAm age is mostly caused by environmental factors, including those shared to different extents by relatives while living together and whose effects persist into old age. The equal environment assumption of the classic twin study might not hold for epigenetic aging.

20 January 2023 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMandy L. Ballinger
Mandy L. Ballinger
SPSwetansu Pattnaik
Swetansu Pattnaik
PMPiyushkumar A. Mundra
Piyushkumar A. Mundra
MZMilita Zaheed
Milita Zaheed
EREmma Rath
Emma Rath
DTDavid M. Thomas
David M. Thomas
Cancer genetics has to date focused on epithelial malignancies, identifying multiple histotype-specific pathways underlying cancer susceptibility. Sarcomas are rare malignancies predominantly derived from embryonic mesoderm. To identify pathways specific to mesenchymal cancers, we performed whole-genome germline sequencing on 1644 sporadic cases and 3205 matched healthy elderly controls. Using an extreme phenotype design, a combined rare-variant burden and ontologic analysis identified two sarcoma-specific pathways involved in mitotic and telomere functions. Variants in centrosome genes are linked to malignant peripheral nerve sheath and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, whereas heritable defects in the shelterin complex link susceptibility to sarcoma, melanoma, and thyroid cancers. These studies indicate a specific role for heritable defects in mitotic and telomere biology in risk of sarcomas.

17 May 2018 in International Journal of Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLShuai Li
Shuai Li
EWEe Ming Wong
Ee Ming Wong
MBMinh Bui
Minh Bui
TNTuong L. Nguyen
Tuong L. Nguyen
JJJi-Hoon Eric Joo
Ji-Hoon Eric Joo
JHJohn Hopper
John Hopper

1 March 2023 in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HFHelen M. L. Frazer
Helen M. L. Frazer
JTJennifer S. N. Tang
Jennifer S. N. Tang
MEMichael S. Elliott
Michael S. Elliott
KKKatrina M. Kunicki
Katrina M. Kunicki
BHBrendan Hill
Brendan Hill
DMDavis J. McCarthy
Davis J. McCarthy
“Just Accepted” papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review ...

6 March 2018 in International Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShuai Li
Shuai Li
EWEe Ming Wong
Ee Ming Wong
PDPierre-Antoine Dugue
Pierre-Antoine Dugue
AMAllan F McRae
Allan F McRae
EKEunae Kim
Eunae Kim
JHJohn Hopper
John Hopper
Investigating the genetic and environmental causes of variation in genome-wide average DNA methylation (GWAM), a global methylation measure from the HumanMethylation450 array, might give a better understanding of genetic and environmental influences on methylation. We measured GWAM for 2299 individuals aged 0 to 90 years from seven twin and/or family studies. We estimated familial correlations, modelled correlations with cohabitation history and fitted variance components models for GWAM. The correlation in GWAM for twin pairs was ∼0.8 at birth, decreased with age during adolescence and was constant at ∼0.4 throughout adulthood, with no evidence that twin pair correlations differed by zygosity. Non-twin first-degree relatives were correlated, from 0.17 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05–0.30] to 0.28 (95% CI: 0.08–0.48), except for middle-aged siblings (0.01, 95% CI: −0.10–0.12), and the correlation increased with time living together and decreased with time living apart. Spouse pairs were correlated in all studies, from 0.23 (95% CI: 0.3–0.43) to 0.31 (95% CI: 0.05–0.52), and the correlation increased with time living together. The variance explained by environmental factors shared by twins alone was 90% (95% CI: 74–95%) at birth, decreased in early life and plateaued at 28% (95% CI: 17–39%) in middle age and beyond. There was a cohabitation-related environmental component of variance. GWAM is determined in utero by prenatal environmental factors, the effects of which persist throughout life. The variation of GWAM is also influenced by environmental factors shared by family members, as well as by individual-specific environmental factors.