Background: Treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) leads to initial response in most patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast, little is known of the subpopulation of patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations who exhibit clinical outcomes that require treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, to identify eligible cases to treat with ICIs, we retrospectively analyzed the correlation between clinical features and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with EGFR mutations.Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with ICIs after developing resistance to EGFR‐TKIs between February 2016 and April 2018 at 6 institutions in Japan. The association between clinical outcomes and the efficacy of ICIs was investigated.Results: We enrolled 27 patients who harbored EGFR‐activating mutations. The objective response and disease control rates were higher in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations than in those with common EGFR mutations (71% vs 35.7% and 57% vs 7%, P = 0.14 and P < 0.01, respectively). Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations or without T790M mutations exhibited a significantly longer median progression‐free survival than those with common EGFR mutations or with T790M mutations (P = 0.003 and P = 0.03, respectively).Conclusion: Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and without T790M mutations are associated with the best outcomes for treatment with immunotherapy among those with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC, based on retrospective analysis. Further research is needed to validate the clinical biomarkers involved in ICI responders with EGFR mutations.

Conventional therapies still remain less effective for metastasis of lung cancer, thus leading to a poor prognosis for this disorder. Although the processes involved in metastasis have not yet been clearly elucidated, our previous studies have shown that higher expression levels of MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 in cancer cells are significantly correlated with less metastatic potency. To determine whether the gene transfer of these tetraspanins into lung tumor cells may be a useful strategy to regulate metastasis, we adopted an orthotopic lung cancer model produced by the intrapulmonary implantation of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells and evaluated the metastatic growth in the mediastinal lymph nodes using two different methods of gene delivery as follows: (a) the implantation of LLC cells preinfected with adenovirus encoding either MRP-1/CD9 cDNA, KAI1/CD82 cDNA, or LacZ gene into the mouse lung and (b) the intratracheal administration of these adenoviruses into the mice orthotopically preimplanted with LLC cells. In both cases, we found that the delivery of either MRP-1/CD9 or KAI1/CD82 cDNA dramatically reduced the metastases to the mediastinal lymph nodes in comparison with those of LacZ gene delivery, without affecting the primary tumor growth at the implanted site. These results reemphasize the important role of MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 in the suppression of the metastatic process and also show the feasibility of gene therapy when using these tetraspanins for lung cancer to prevent metastasis to the regional lymph nodes. This strategy may therefore be clinically applicable as a prophylactic treatment to suppress the occurrence of lymph node metastasis. [Cancer Res 2007;67(4):1744–9]

Little is known regarding the effectiveness and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge after disease progression following initial ICI treatments. To identify eligible patients for ICI rechallenge, we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between clinical profiles and the effect of ICI rechallenge in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We enrolled 35 NSCLC patients at six different institutions who were retreated with ICIs after discontinued initial ICI treatments due to disease progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of clinical profiles on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS and OS were 81 d (95% confidence interval, CI, 41–112 d) and 225 d (95% CI 106–361 d), respectively. The objective response rate was 2.9%, and the disease control rate was 42.9%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS) ≥ 2 (hazard ratio, HR, 2.38; 95% CI 1.03–5.52; p = 0.043) and body mass index (BMI) > 20 (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.95, p = 0.036) were significantly associated with PFS of ICI rechallenge. Our observations suggest that poor ECOG-PS and low BMI at intervention with ICI rechallenge may be negative predictors for ICI rechallenge treatment in patients with NSCLC.

Background: Although phase III trials have shown improved overall and progression‐free survival (PFS) using nivolumab compared to docetaxel in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer, the progressive disease ratio of nivolumab is higher than docetaxel. Furthermore, nonconventional response patterns of nivolumab make it difficult to determine the time point for nivolumab discontinuation. Therefore, a method to detect non‐responders to nivolumab at an early time point is crucial. This retrospective study was conducted to identify immunological and nutritional markers, including neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratios (NLR), which would predict the efficacy of nivolumab treatment. Because the expression of these markers fluctuates dramatically during treatment, repeat evaluation was performed.Methods: We retrospectively investigated 30 patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer who were treated with nivolumab. The stratified data of each marker obtained during four weeks after nivolumab treatment were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression to verify the differences in PFS.Results: One and four patients experienced progressive disease within two and four weeks, respectively. Therefore, 29 and 26 patients were analyzed two and four weeks after nivolumab administration, respectively. The results showed that the NLR after four weeks could predict PFS. The median PFS in 21 patients with NLR < 5 after four weeks of nivolumab administration was 95 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 50–NA), while the mPFS in five patients with NLR ≥ 5 was 10 days (95% CI 6–NA). NLR ≥ 5 showed a hazard ratio of 5.995 (95% CI 1.225–29.35).Conclusion: Clarifying NLR four weeks after nivolumab administration may be useful to predict outcomes in nivolumab‐treated patients.

Although previous studies suggest that cancer cachexia is a poor prognostic factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, the impact of cancer cachexia on chemoimmunotherapy is unclear. We investigated the impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively analyzed patients’ medical records with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy in 12 institutions in Japan between January and November 2019. We defined cancer cachexia as weight loss exceeding 5% of the total body weight or a body mass index of < 20 kg/m² and weight loss of more than 2% of the total body weight within 6 months before chemoimmunotherapy initiation, with laboratory results exceeding reference values. This study enrolled 235 patients with NSCLC, among whom 196 were eligible for analysis, and 50 (25.5%) met the criteria for cachexia diagnosis. Patients with cancer cachexia had a significantly higher frequency of a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥ 50% (48%, p = .01) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS; log-rank test: p = .04) than patients without cachexia. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the cachexia and no-cachexia groups (log-rank test: p = .14). In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% population, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS (log-rank test: p = .19 and p = .79, respectively) between patients with NSCLC in the cachexia or no-cachexia groups. Cancer cachexia might be a poor prognostic factor in patients with NSCLC receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Background: First‐line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has improved overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) outcomes among patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The immunological and nutritional statuses of patients fluctuate during treatment using immune checkpoint inhibitors, and are closely related to treatment outcomes. However, it is unclear whether these markers are significant in patients who are receiving CIT.Methods: This retrospective single‐center study evaluated 34 consecutive Japanese patients with NSCLC who were treated using first‐line CIT. Previously reported markers that reflect immunological and nutritional statuses were evaluated at three time points: at the start of CIT, after three weeks, and at the end of induction therapy.Results: The median PFS was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval: 6.3 months–not reached) and the median OS was not reached (95% confidence interval: 9.6 months–not reached). The PFS duration was significantly associated with the baseline neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio and the three‐week values for the modified Glasgow prognostic score, C‐reactive protein‐albumin ratio, prognostic nutrition index, and advanced lung cancer inflammation index. The OS duration was significantly associated with the pre‐treatment values for the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio and advanced lung cancer inflammation index, as well as the prognostic nutrition index at the end of induction therapy.Conclusions: Immunological and nutritional markers could be useful for predicting the outcomes of CIT for Japanese patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. The timing of their evaluation may also be important.Key points: Significant findings of the study: Overall survival in patients receiving first‐line chemoimmunotherapy for advanced lung cancer were associated with pretreatment values of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, advanced lung cancer inflammation index, and the prognostic nutrition index at the end of induction therapy.What this study adds: Repetitive evaluation of immunological and nutritional markers may be useful for guiding prognostication and treatment selection for Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer.