Moshe Sitbon

Dr. Moshe Sitbon

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2015 in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Moshe SitbonMoshe Sitbon
Moshe Sitbon
SSS. Schacham
S. Schacham
AKA. Kuperman
A. Kuperman
In this paper, a robust control method based on a disturbance observer is proposed to regulate the terminal voltage of a photovoltaic generator, interfaced by a current mode-controlled boost dc-dc converter. The combined generator-converter-load system possesses a nonlinear behavior, highly dependent on operation point and environmental variables, thus burdening the control task. It is shown that employing a typical linear controller, designed according to a single nominal operating point, results in a closed-loop performance, varying from a highly overdamped near open-circuit condition to greatly underdamped around short-circuit conditions. On the other hand, when the proposed robust controller is utilized, the closed-loop performance remains nearly nominal throughout the whole operation range. In addition, it is shown that, by sacrificing the performance in the vicinity of the open-circuit point, it is possible to implement the controller using a single op-amp with a reduced part count. Simulation and experimental results are presented to verify the proposed method.

23 February 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJyri Kivimaki
Jyri Kivimaki
SKSergei Kolesnik
Sergei Kolesnik
Moshe SitbonMoshe Sitbon
Moshe Sitbon
TSTeuvo Suntio
Teuvo Suntio
Alon KupermanAlon Kuperman
Alon Kuperman
In order to optimize the performance of direct (or perturbative) fixed-step maximum power point tracking algorithms (e.g., perturb and observe and incremental conductance), two design parameters-perturbation frequency and step size-must be selected. The main requirement for perturbation frequency design is ensuring the period between two successive perturbations is longer than settling time of photovoltaic generator power transient. According to existing design guidelines, perturbation frequency should be selected at maximum power point, corresponding to standard test conditions. However, due to finite resolution of digital controllers, maximum power region rather than single maximum power point exists in practice. Therefore, operating point can arbitrarily reside within this region, belonging either to constant-current or constant-voltage I-V curve parts. It is shown that the photovoltaic generator power transient settling process is significantly slower in constant current than maximum power region due to increased value of dynamic resistance. Consequently, perturbation frequency design should be carried out in constant-current region rather than at maximum power point. Short-circuit condition should be selected as worst-case design operation point, where photovoltaic generator dynamic resistance obtains highest value. Then, perturbation frequency design becomes photovoltaic generator independent, influenced only by interfacing converter component values. Experimental results validate presented findings successfully.

15 March 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJyri Kivimaki
Jyri Kivimaki
SKSergei Kolesnik
Sergei Kolesnik
Moshe SitbonMoshe Sitbon
Moshe Sitbon
TSTeuvo Suntio
Teuvo Suntio
Alon KupermanAlon Kuperman
Alon Kuperman
Due to relatively good performance and simple implementation, fixed-step direct maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques such as perturb and observe and incremental conductance are the most popular algorithms aimed to maximize the energy yield of photovoltaic energy conversion systems. In order to optimize the MPPT process performance, two design parameters—perturbation frequency and perturbation step size—need to be set a priori , taking into account the properties of both interfacing power converter and photovoltaic generator. While perturbation frequency is limited by the combined energy conversion system settling time, perturbation step size must be high enough to differentiate system response from that caused by irradiation variation. Recent studies have provided explicit design guidelines for single-loop MPPT structures only, where the algorithm directly sets the interfacing converter duty cycle. It was shown that dynamic resistance of the photovoltaic generator, which is both operation point and environmental conditions dependent, significantly affects the combined energy conversion system settling time. On the other hand, no design guidelines were explicitly given for multiloop MPPT structures, where the algorithm sets the reference signal for photovoltaic generator (PVG) voltage and inner-voltage controller performs the regulation task. This paper introduces perturbation frequency and perturbation step size design guidelines for such systems. It is shown that while perturbation step size design is similar to that of single-loop structures, perturbation frequency design is quite different. It is revealed that once the inner-voltage loop is properly closed, the influence of PVG dynamic resistance on settling time (and thus on perturbation frequency design) is negligible. Experimental results are provided to verify the proposed guidelines validity.

1 May 2015 in IET Renewable Power Generation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJ. Viinamäki
J. Viinamäki
JJJ. Jokipii
J. Jokipii
TMTuomas Messo
Tuomas Messo
TSTeuvo Suntio
Teuvo Suntio
Moshe SitbonMoshe Sitbon
Moshe Sitbon
Alon KupermanAlon Kuperman
Alon Kuperman
In transformer‐less grid‐connected renewable energy systems, interfacing of photovoltaic (PV) generators is typically implemented by means of DC–DC boost‐power‐stage converter, mainly because of its voltage‐boosting capability. In order to track the maximum power point of a PV generator, input voltage of the converter is usually feedback controlled, forcing the converter to operate as a current‐sourced rather than voltage‐sourced converter. Nevertheless, PV generator interfacing power stage is commonly assumed to possess the same dynamic properties as corresponding voltage‐sourced power stage. Investigations presented in this study reveal explicitly that the dynamics of PV generator interfacing DC–DC boost power stage resembles conventional buck power stage behaviour with duty‐cycle independent resonance and additional right‐half‐plane zeros. In addition, the duty cycle has to be decreased for increasing the corresponding output variables (i.e. input voltage and output current). Extended experimental results are given to support the theoretical findings.

23 December 2014 in IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Moshe SitbonMoshe Sitbon
Moshe Sitbon
JLJ. Leppaaho
J. Leppaaho
TSTeuvo Suntio
Teuvo Suntio
Alon KupermanAlon Kuperman
Alon Kuperman
This paper investigates the dynamic properties of the photovoltaic-generator-interfacing voltage-controlled buck power stage operating in both the maximum and limited power point tracking modes. The photovoltaic generator (PVG) is known to possess both current- and voltage-source properties with respect to its maximum power point. While voltage-fed operation is conventional, current-fed action is nontrivial and is thoroughly analyzed in this paper. The photovoltaic-generator-interfacing converter is formed by adding a capacitor at conventional voltage-fed converter input terminals, turning it into a current-fed power stage. During the maximum power point tracking phase, converter input voltage is regulated, possessing nontrivial dynamics. The situation is burdened further when output-voltage control should be alternatively realized to limit the voltage of the converter terminating the energy storage element. It is shown that both the photovoltaic generator and the terminating energy storage greatly affect the combined system dynamics. Parallel as well as cascaded control arrangements are proposed to support dual-mode system operation. Extended experimental results are shown to enforce presented theory and reveal nontrivial dynamics-related issues.

1 March 2014 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGShlomo Gadelovits
Shlomo Gadelovits
Alon KupermanAlon Kuperman
Alon Kuperman
Moshe SitbonMoshe Sitbon
Moshe Sitbon
Ilan AharonIlan Aharon
Ilan Aharon
SSSigmond Singer
Sigmond Singer