Paulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva

Dr. Paulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 April 2016 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFernanda S. Farnese
Fernanda S. Farnese
PMPaulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
Paulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
GGGrasielle S. Gusman
Grasielle S. Gusman
JOJuraci Oliveira
Juraci Oliveira
The natural environment of plants is composed of a complex set of abiotic stresses and their ability to respond to these stresses is highly flexible and finely balanced through the interaction between signaling molecules. In this review, we highlight the integrated action between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), particularly nitric oxide (NO), involved in the acclimation to different abiotic stresses. Under stressful conditions, the biosynthesis transport and the metabolism of ROS and NO influence plant response mechanisms. The enzymes involved in ROS and NO synthesis and scavenging can be found in different cells compartments and their temporal and spatial locations are determinant for signaling mechanisms. Both ROS and NO are involved in long distances signaling (ROS wave and GSNO transport), promoting an acquired systemic acclimation to abiotic stresses. The mechanisms of abiotic stresses response triggered by ROS and NO involve some general steps, as the enhancement of antioxidant systems, but also stress-specific mechanisms, according to the stress type (drought, hypoxia, heavy metals, etc), and demand the interaction with other signaling molecules, such as MAPK, plant hormones and calcium. The transduction of ROS and NO bioactivity involves post-translational modifications of proteins, particularly S-glutathionylation for ROS, and S-nitrosylation for NO. These changes may alter the activity, stability, and interaction with other molecules or subcellular location of proteins, changing the entire cell dynamics and contributing to the maintenance of homeostasis. However, despite the recent advances about the roles of ROS and NO in signaling cascades, many challenges remain, and future studies focusing on the signaling of these molecules in planta are still necessary.

23 April 2022 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Celia M. Rodríguez DomínguezCelia M. Rodríguez Domínguez
Celia M. Rodríguez Domínguez
AFAlicia Forner
Alicia Forner
SMSebastia Martorell
Sebastia Martorell
BCBrendan Choat
Brendan Choat
RLRosana Lopez
Rosana Lopez
LSLawren Sack
Lawren Sack
Leaf water potential (ψleaf), typically measured using the pressure chamber, is the most important metric of plant water status, providing high theoretical value and information content for multiple applications in quantifying critical physiological processes including drought responses. Pressure chamber measurements of ψleaf (ψleafPC) are most typical, yet, the practical complexity of the technique and of the underlying theory has led to ambiguous understanding of the conditions to optimize measurements. Consequently, specific techniques and precautions diversified across the global research community, raising questions of reliability and repeatability. Here, we surveyed specific methods of ψleafPC from multiple laboratories, and synthesized experiments testing common assumptions and practices in ψleafPC for diverse species: (i) the need for equilibration of previously transpiring leaves; (ii) leaf storage before measurement; (iii) the equilibration of ψleaf for leaves on bagged branches of a range of dehydration; (iv) the equilibration of ψleaf across the lamina for bagged leaves, and the accuracy of measuring leaves with artificially ‘elongated petioles’; (v) the need in ψleaf measurements for bagging leaves and high humidity within the chamber; (vi) the need to avoid liquid water on leaf surfaces; (vii) the use of ‘pulse’ pressurization versus gradual pressurization; and (viii) variation among experimenters in ψleafPC determination. Based on our findings we provide a best practice protocol to maximise accuracy, and provide recommendations for ongoing species‐specific tests of important assumptions in future studies.

10 July 2017 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPaulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
Paulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
LSLilian Maria Vincis Pereira Sanglard
Lilian Maria Vincis Pereira Sanglard
RÁRodrigo T Ávila
Rodrigo T Ávila
LMLeandro E Morais
Leandro E Morais
SMSamuel C V Martins
Samuel C V Martins
Fábio M. DaMattaFábio M. DaMatta
Fábio M. DaMatta
Over the last decades, most information on the mechanisms underlying tolerance to drought has been gained by considering this stress as a single event that happens just once in the life of a plant, in contrast to what occurs under natural conditions where recurrent drought episodes are the rule. Here we explored mechanisms of drought tolerance in coffee (Coffea canephora) plants from a broader perspective, integrating key aspects of plant physiology and biochemistry. We show that plants exposed to multiple drought events displayed higher photosynthetic rates, which were largely accounted for by biochemical rather than diffusive or hydraulic factors, than those submitted to drought for the first time. Indeed, these plants displayed higher activities of RuBisCO and other enzymes associated with carbon and antioxidant metabolism. Acclimation to multiple drought events involved the expression of trainable genes related to drought tolerance and was also associated with a deep metabolite reprogramming with concordant alterations in central metabolic processes such as respiration and photorespiration. Our results demonstrate that plants exposed to multiple drought cycles can develop a differential acclimation that potentiates their defence mechanisms, allowing them to be kept in an ‘alert state’ to successfully cope with further drought events.

2 October 2019 in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPaulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
Paulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
LLLucas Loram‐Lourenço
Lucas Loram‐Lourenço
RARauander Douglas Ferreira Barros Alves
Rauander Douglas Ferreira Barros Alves
LSLeticia Ferreira de Sousa
Leticia Ferreira de Sousa
SASabrina Emanuella da Silva Almeida
Sabrina Emanuella da Silva Almeida
FFFernanda Santos Farnese
Fernanda Santos Farnese
Anthropogenic activities such as uncontrolled deforestation and increasing greenhouse gas emissions are responsible for triggering a series of environmental imbalances that affect the Earth's complex climate dynamics. As a consequence of these changes, several climate models forecast an intensification of extreme weather events over the upcoming decades, including heat waves and increasingly severe drought and flood episodes. The occurrence of such extreme weather will prompt profound changes in several plant communities, resulting in massive forest dieback events that can trigger a massive loss of biodiversity in several biomes worldwide. Despite the gravity of the situation, our knowledge regarding how extreme weather events can undermine the performance, survival, and distribution of forest species remains very fragmented. Therefore, the present review aimed to provide a broad and integrated perspective of the main biochemical, physiological, and morpho‐anatomical disorders that may compromise the performance and survival of forest species exposed to climate change factors, particularly drought, flooding, and global warming. In addition, we also discuss the controversial effects of high CO2 concentrations in enhancing plant growth and reducing the deleterious effects of some extreme climatic events. We conclude with a discussion about the possible effects that the factors associated with the climate change might have on species distribution and forest composition.

22 September 2020 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RMRenan Machado
Renan Machado
LLLucas Loram Loram Lourenço
Lucas Loram Loram Lourenço
FFFernanda S. Farnese
Fernanda S. Farnese
RARauander Douglas Ferreira Barros Alves
Rauander Douglas Ferreira Barros Alves
LSLeticia Ferreira de Sousa
Leticia Ferreira de Sousa
PMPaulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
Paulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva

26 October 2015 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Fábio M. DaMattaFábio M. DaMatta
Fábio M. DaMatta
AGAlice G. Godoy
Alice G. Godoy
PMPaulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
Paulo Eduardo Menezes-Silva
SMSamuel C.V. Martins
Samuel C.V. Martins
LSLílian M.V.P. Sanglard
Lílian M.V.P. Sanglard
RGRaquel Ghini
Raquel Ghini
Coffee (Coffea spp.), a globally traded commodity, is a slow-growing tropical tree species that displays an improved photosynthetic performance when grown under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations ([CO2]). To investigate the mechanisms underlying this response, two commercial coffee cultivars (Catuaí and Obatã) were grown using the first free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) facility in Latin America. Measurements were conducted in two contrasting growth seasons, which were characterized by the high (February) and low (August) sink demand. Elevated [CO2] led to increases in net photosynthetic rates (A) in parallel with decreased photorespiration rates, with no photochemical limitations to A. The stimulation of A by elevated CO2 supply was more prominent in August (56% on average) than in February (40% on average). Overall, the stomatal and mesophyll conductances, as well as the leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, were unresponsive to the treatments. Photosynthesis was strongly limited by diffusional constraints, particularly at the stomata level, and this pattern was little, if at all, affected by elevated [CO2]. Relative to February, starch pools (but not soluble sugars) increased remarkably (>500%) in August, with no detectable alteration in the maximum carboxylation capacity estimated on a chloroplast [CO2] basis. Upregulation of A by elevated [CO2] took place with no signs of photosynthetic downregulation, even during the period of low sink demand, when acclimation would be expected to be greatest.