Yan Li

Ms. Yan Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XHXumei Hu
Xumei Hu
JZJiahao Zhou
Jiahao Zhou
YLYan Li
Yan Li
YWYikun Wang
Yikun Wang
JGJing Guo
Jing Guo
CWChengyan Wang
Chengyan Wang
This study aimed to explore the added value of viscoelasticity measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in the prediction of Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a deep learning combined radiomics (DLCR) model. This retrospective study included 108 histopathology-proven HCC patients (93 males; age, 59.6 ± 11.0 years) who underwent preoperative MRI and MR elastography. They were divided into training (n = 87; 61.0 ± 9.8 years) and testing (n = 21; 60.6 ± 10.1 years) cohorts. An independent validation cohort including 43 patients (60.1 ± 11.3 years) was included for testing. A DLCR model was proposed to predict the expression of Ki-67 with cMRI, including T2W, DW, and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) images as inputs. The images of the shear wave speed (c-map) and phase angle (φ-map) derived from MRE were also fed into the DLCR model. The Ki-67 expression was classified into low and high groups with a threshold of 20%. Both c and φ values were ranked within the top six features for Ki-67 prediction with random forest selection, which revealed the value of MRE-based viscosity for the assessment of tumor proliferation status in HCC. When comparing the six CNN models, Xception showed the best performance for classifying the Ki-67 expression, with an AUC of 0.80 ± 0.03 (CI: 0.79–0.81) and accuracy of 0.77 ± 0.04 (CI: 0.76–0.78) when cMRI were fed into the model. The model with all modalities (MRE, AFP, and cMRI) as inputs achieved the highest AUC of 0.90 ± 0.03 (CI: 0.89–0.91) in the validation cohort. The same finding was observed in the independent testing cohort, with an AUC of 0.83 ± 0.03 (CI: 0.82–0.84). The shear wave speed and phase angle improved the performance of the DLCR model significantly for Ki-67 prediction, suggesting that MRE-based c and φ-maps can serve as important parameters to assess the tumor proliferation status in HCC.

28 August 2024 in Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMeng Liu
Meng Liu
YLYan Li
Yan Li
LSLongyu Sun
Longyu Sun
MSMengting Sun
Mengting Sun
XHXumei Hu
Xumei Hu
JMJinlian Ma
Jinlian Ma
As medical imaging technologies advance, these tools are playing a more and more important role in assisting clinical disease diagnosis. The fusion of biomedical imaging and multi-modal information is profound, as it significantly enhances diagnostic precision and comprehensiveness. Integrating multi-organ imaging with genomic information can significantly enhance the accuracy of disease prediction because many diseases involve both environmental and genetic determinants. In the present study, we focused on the fusion of imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) and polygenic risk score (PRS) of diseases from different organs including the brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen, pancreas, and kidney for the prediction of the occurrence of nine common diseases, namely atrial fibrillation, heart failure (HF), hypertension, myocardial infarction, asthma, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in the UK Biobank (UKBB) dataset. For each disease, three prediction models were developed utilizing imaging features, genomic data, and a fusion of both, respectively, and their performances were compared. The results indicated that for seven diseases, the model integrating both imaging and genomic data achieved superior predictive performance compared to models that used only imaging features or only genomic data. For instance, the Area Under Curve (AUC) of HF risk prediction was increased from 0.68 ± 0.15 to 0.79 ± 0.12, and the AUC of CAD diagnosis was increased from 0.76 ± 0.05 to 0.81 ± 0.06.

24 September 2026
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ZWZian Wang
Zian Wang
LLLizhen Lan
Lizhen Lan
GWGuangming Wang
Guangming Wang
HZHaosen Zhang
Haosen Zhang
MXMinxuan Xu
Minxuan Xu
CWChengyan Wang
Chengyan Wang