The affinity of three square-planar nickel(II) (1), copper(II) (2) and zinc(II) (3) Schiff-base complexes for wild-type human telomeric (h-Telo) and protooncogene c-myc G-quadruplex (G4) DNA was investigated by UV-visible absorption spectroscopy and circular dichroism. DNA-binding constants (K_b) were determined by spectrophotometric titrations for both G4-DNA and B-DNA. The results obtained point out that the three metal complexes selectively bind G4-DNA with higher affinity, up to two orders of magnitude, with respect to B-DNA. The nickel(II) complex 1 was found to be the most effective G4-DNA stabilizer and the K_b values decrease in the order 1 > 2 ≈ 3. Innovative computational investigations, consisting of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations followed by density functional theory/molecular mechanics (DFT/MM) calculations, provide atomistic support for the interpretation of the binding mechanism to G4-DNA by end stacking and also of the experimental affinity order. Interestingly, 1 is able to induce G4-DNA formation of h-Telo sequences, also in the absence of K⁺ cations. This last result is nicely confirmed and highlighted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stop assays, which show the ability of the title compounds to induce and stabilize G4 structures inhibiting the amplification of PCR products. Finally, compounds 1–3 showed concentration and time-dependent cytotoxicity towards HeLa and MCF-7 human cancer cell lines, inducing significant effects on cell cycle distribution with G2/M arrest in HeLa cells and G0/G1 arrest in MCF-7 cells. Overall, the PCR inhibition and anticancer activity of the three compounds decreases in the same order 1 > 2 ≈ 3, in excellent correlation with the G4-DNA-binding affinity, implying that G4-DNA is the biotarget for their biological activity.

We present a thorough characterization of the interaction of novel nickel(II) (1), copper(II) (2) and zinc(II) (3) Schiff base complexes with native calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA), in buffered aqueous solution at pH 7.5. UV-vis absorption, circular dichroism (CD) and viscometry titrations provided clear evidence of the intercalative mechanism of the three square-planar metal complexes, allowing us to determine the intrinsic DNA-binding constants (K_b), equal to 1.3 × 10⁷, 2.9 × 10⁶, and 6.2 × 10⁵ M⁻¹ for 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Preferential affinity, of one order of magnitude, toward AT compared to GC base pair sequences was detected by UV-vis absorption titrations of 1 with [poly(dG-dC)]₂ and [poly(dA-dT)]₂. Structural details of the intercalation site of the three metal complexes within [dodeca(dA-dT)]₂ were obtained by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations followed by density functional theory/molecular mechanics (DFT/MM) calculations. The calculations revealed that three major intermolecular interactions contribute to the strong affinity between DNA and the three metal complexes: (1) the electrostatic attraction between the two positively charged triethylammoniummethyl groups of the metal complexes and the negatively charged phosphate groups of the DNA backbone; (2) the intercalation of the naphthalene moiety within the four nitrogen bases of the intercalation site; (3) the metal coordination by exocyclic donor atoms of the bases, specifically the carbonyl oxygen and amine nitrogen atoms. Remarkably, the Gibbs formation free energy calculated for the intercalation complexes of 1, 2 and 3 with [dodeca(dA-dT)]₂ in the implicit water solution is in agreement with the experimental Gibbs free energy values obtained from the DNA-binding constants as ΔG° = −RT ln(K_b). In particular, the DNA-binding affinity trend, 1 > 2 > 3, is reproduced. Finally, the first shell coordination distances calculated for the intercalation complex 3/[dodeca(dA-dT)]₂ are in excellent agreement with the experimental distances extracted from the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectrum of the corresponding 3/ct-DNA solutions. The latter results provided the first evidence of metal ion coordination by native DNA in aqueous solution.

Heat shock protein 60kDa (Hsp60) is a chaperone classically believed to be involved in assisting the correct folding of other mitochondrial proteins. Hsp60 also plays a role in cytoprotection against cell stressors, displaying for example, antiapoptotic potential. Despite the plethora of studies devoted to the mechanism of Hsp60’s function, especially in prokaryotes, fundamental issues still remain unexplored, including the definition of its role in cancer. Key questions still unanswered pertain to the differences in structure-function features that might exist between the well-studied prokaryotic GroEL and the largely unexplored eukaryotic Hsp60 proteins. In this article we discuss these differences in sequence, structure, and roles of Hsp60, focusing on the human ortholog with the view of devising compounds to block its ability to favour tumor-cell growth and survival. Compounds currently known to directly or indirectly affect Hsp60 functions, such as protein folding, HIF-1α accumulation, or Hsp60-induced cell proliferation, are discussed along with strategies that might prove effective for developing Hsp60-targeting drugs for anticancer therapy.