Henry L. Classen

Henry L. Classen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2010 in Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADA. Deep
A. Deep
KSK. Schwean-Lardner
K. Schwean-Lardner
TCT. G. Crowe
T. G. Crowe
BFB. I. Fancher
B. I. Fancher
HCHenry L. Classen
Henry L. Classen
Manipulation of light intensity is an important management tool affecting broiler production and well being. Despite considerable research on light i

1 October 2007 in Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBK. E. Brickett
K. E. Brickett
JDJ. P. Dahiya
J. P. Dahiya
HCHenry L. Classen
Henry L. Classen
SGS. Gomis
S. Gomis
The objective of this study was to examine main and interactive effects of nutrient density (ND), feed form (FF; mash, pellet), and lighting program (12L:12D, 20L:4D) on production characteristics and meat yield of broilers raised to 35 d of age. Diets (starter, grower, and finisher) were formulated so that amino acid levels were in proportion to the dietary energy level. Lighting programs were initiated at 4 d of age. Body weight was not affected by ND when diets were fed in a pellet form but decreased in a linear manner with lower ND when fed as a mash. Final BW of birds fed mash were less than those of birds fed pellet diets. Feed to gain ratio decreased with increasing ND but was not affected by FF. Feed intake decreased with increasing ND and was lower for birds fed mash. The effect of ND on feed intake was less when birds were fed mash in contrast to pellet diets (PND × F < 0.0001). Dietary ND had no effect on mortality, but feeding mash decreased mortality (3.8%) compared with feeding pelleted feed (5.6%). Lighting programs affected production characteristics independently of ND and FF. Use of 12L:12D reduced BW, feed to gain ratio, feed intake, and mortality compared with 20L:4D. Similarly, carcass components were not affected by ND when fed in pellet form but decreased with lower ND when fed as a mash. Overall, carcass yields were reduced when broilers were fed mash or provided with 12L:12D. Female birds had higher carcass yields and increased proportional breast meat deposition compared with males.

1 October 2007 in Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBK. E. Brickett
K. E. Brickett
JDJ. P. Dahiya
J. P. Dahiya
HCHenry L. Classen
Henry L. Classen
CAC. B. Annett
C. B. Annett
SGS. Gomis
S. Gomis
The aim of this study was to examine the main and interaction effects of 3 dietary nutrient densities (low-, medium-, high-density), 2 feed forms (mash, pellet), and 2 lighting programs (20L:4D, 12L:12D) on the walking ability and skeletal quality of broiler chickens raised to a young age (35 d). Forty-eight birds per treatment (nutrient density × feed form × lighting program subclass) were randomly selected (0 d) for assessment of their gait score (GS) and BW at 11, 18, 25, and 32 d. Samples of birds from various GS classifications were selected at 32 d for radiographs and histology of the femur and tibiotarsus. Bone ash (BA) content was evaluated at 35 d from the right tibiotarsus to assess bone quality. Overall, the mean GS values were low (GS <1). An interaction existed between lighting and sex. Males provided with 20L:4D had a higher GS (0.74) than females (0.45), and this score was greater than for broilers provided with 12L:12D (0.34 and 0.26 for males and females, respectively). Feeding mash reduced the GS (0.29) compared with pellet rations (0.62). The GS increased with age, and by 32 d 2.43% of birds had a GS ≥3. Broilers fed mash had a higher BA content (50.6%) than birds fed pellet diets (49.8%), and the 12L:12D value (50.5%) was greater than for 20L:4D (48.9%). Last, males had a lower BA content (49.8%) than females (50.6%). A positive correlation existed between BW and GS based on sex, where BW at 11, 18, and 25 d affected bird mobility at 32 d (r2 = 0.39, 0.49, and 0.50 for males; r2 = 0.34, 0.37, and 0.36 for females, respectively). Radiography and histology were unaffected by GS. This study confirmed that a reduced growth rate improved GS but also demonstrated that overall bird mobility was good and the incidence of skeletal disease was low.

1 September 2016 in World's Poultry Science Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHenry L. Classen
Henry L. Classen
JAJuha H.A. Apajalahti
Juha H.A. Apajalahti
BSB. Svihus
B. Svihus
MCM. Choct
M. Choct
The importance of the crop is often underestimated in poultry production. In addition to storing ingested feed, it also can impact nutrient digestion by digesta softening and the initial activity of feed (endogenous and exogenous) and microbial enzymes. The crop represents the first major defence against poultry pathogens and zoonotic organisms with well established adaptive and innate immune function, and a lactobacilli dominated microbiota capable of reducing the passage of these organisms further along the digestive tract. However, the potential to improve bird productivity and health, as well as affect meat and egg safety, are influenced by the nature of the diet, and in particular feed entry and extended presence in the crop. This is required to promote lactobacilli fermentation, the production of lactic acid and other volatile fatty acids, and the lowering of crop pH. Management practices such as meal feeding and the use of lighting programs with extended dark periods encourage crop utilisation. Further, the use of feed additives such as prebiotics and probiotics may enhance crop function, which in turn contributes to well-being of the entire digestive tract. A healthy and functional crop, along with other segments of digestive tract, has increased importance in an era of reduced antibiotic use in poultry feeds.

15 November 2013 in British Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADA. Deep
A. Deep
CRC. Raginski
C. Raginski
KSK. Schwean-Lardner
K. Schwean-Lardner
BFB.I. Fancher
B.I. Fancher
HCHenry L. Classen
Henry L. Classen
1. Research focused on lower light intensity levels is required to set minimum standards appropriate for production and welfare of intensively housed broilers. The objective of this research was to study light intensity (0.1 to 10 lx) effects on Ross × Ross 308 and 708 genotypes. 2. Three experiments (35 d each) using 18 720 broilers were conducted with the initial experiment using two replicates of 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 lx. The second and third experiments examined 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 lx with treatments replicated twice in each experiment in a randomised complete block design with experiment acting as a block. In each experiment, mixed sex broilers from each genotype were housed in 6 equally sized pens per room. 3. In Experiment 1, the introduction of 0.1 lx at d 7 caused high levels of mortality and poor growth rate from d 7 to 14 and was discontinued. 4. In Experiments 2 and 3, increasing light intensity increased body weight gain (0–35 d) and feed intake (0–35 d) in a quadratic and linear fashion, respectively. Similarly, mortality corrected gain to feed ratio (FCR, 0–35 d) demonstrated a quadratic response with a maximum at 5 lx. Carcass, breast meat and skin, abdominal fat and drum skin, as a percentage of live weight, increased while drum bone and wing yield decreased in a linear fashion with increasing light intensity. Total carcass composition was unaffected by light intensity. 5. Genotype effects were numerous. No interactions were found between genotype and light intensity. 6. Ocular dimensions and the incidence of foot pad lesions decreased in a quadratic and linear fashion, respectively, with increasing light intensity. In contrast, welfare-associated gait score and mortality levels were not affected by light intensity. 7. It was concluded that performance, breast meat yield and bird welfare improved with increasing light intensity. The data support 5 lx as a minimum light intensity in broiler production.

25 March 2020 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDervan D.S.L Bryan
Dervan D.S.L Bryan
HCHenry L. Classen
Henry L. Classen
Protein quality assessment of feed ingredients for poultry is often achieved using in vitro or in vivo testing. In vivo methods can be expensive and time consuming. Protein quality can also be evaluated using less expensive and time consuming chemical methods, termed in vitro. These techniques are used to improve the user’s efficiency when dealing with large sample numbers, and some mimic the physiological and chemical characteristics of the animal digestive system to which the ingredient will be fed. The pepsin digestibility test is the in vitro method of choice for quick evaluation of protein sample during quality control and in most research settings. Even though the pepsin digestibility test uses enzymes to liberate the amino acids from the protein, it does not mimic normal in vivo digestive conditions. The results obtained with this method may be misleading if the samples tested contain fats or carbohydrates which they often do. Multi-enzyme tests have been proposed to overcome the problem encountered when using the pepsin digestibility test. These tests use a combination of enzymes in one or multiple steps customized to simulate the digestive process of the animal. Multi enzyme assays can predict animal digestibility, but any inherent biological properties of the ingredients on the animal digestive tract will be lost.