Patrick Sachs

Prof. Patrick Sachs


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2019 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPeter Mollica
Peter Mollica
EBElizabeth N. Booth-Creech
Elizabeth N. Booth-Creech
JRJohn A. Reid
John A. Reid
MZMartina Zamponi
Martina Zamponi
SSShea M. Sullivan
Shea M. Sullivan
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno

1 June 2016 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJohn A Reid
John A Reid
PMPeter Mollica
Peter Mollica
GJGarett D Johnson
Garett D Johnson
RORoy C Ogle
Roy C Ogle
RBRobert D Bruno
Robert D Bruno
PSPatrick Sachs
Patrick Sachs
The precision and repeatability offered by computer-aided design and computer-numerically controlled techniques in biofabrication processes is quickly becoming an industry standard. However, many hurdles still exist before these techniques can be used in research laboratories for cellular and molecular biology applications. Extrusion-based bioprinting systems have been characterized by high development costs, injector clogging, difficulty achieving small cell number deposits, decreased cell viability, and altered cell function post-printing. To circumvent the high-price barrier to entry of conventional bioprinters, we designed and 3D printed components for the adaptation of an inexpensive 'off-the-shelf' commercially available 3D printer. We also demonstrate via goal based computer simulations that the needle geometries of conventional commercially standardized, 'luer-lock' syringe-needle systems cause many of the issues plaguing conventional bioprinters. To address these performance limitations we optimized flow within several microneedle geometries, which revealed a short tapered injector design with minimal cylindrical needle length was ideal to minimize cell strain and accretion. We then experimentally quantified these geometries using pulled glass microcapillary pipettes and our modified, low-cost 3D printer. This systems performance validated our models exhibiting: reduced clogging, single cell print resolution, and maintenance of cell viability without the use of a sacrificial vehicle. Using this system we show the successful printing of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) into Geltrex and note their retention of a pluripotent state 7 d post printing. We also show embryoid body differentiation of hiPSC by injection into differentiation conducive environments, wherein we observed continuous growth, emergence of various evaginations, and post-printing gene expression indicative of the presence of all three germ layers. These data demonstrate an accessible open-source 3D bioprinter capable of serving the needs of any laboratory interested in 3D cellular interactions and tissue engineering.

1 January 2010 in Organogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFMichael Francis
Michael Francis
PSPatrick Sachs
Patrick Sachs
LELynne W. Elmore
Lynne W. Elmore
SHShawn E. Holt
Shawn E. Holt
Isolation of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) typically involves 8+ hours of intense effort, requiring specialized equipment and reagents. Here, we present an improved technique for isolating viab...

16 May 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJohn A. Reid
John A. Reid
XPXavier-Lewis Palmer
Xavier-Lewis Palmer
PMPeter Mollica
Peter Mollica
NNNicole Northam
Nicole Northam
PSPatrick Sachs
Patrick Sachs
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno
The normal mammary microenvironment can suppress tumorigenesis and redirect cancer cells to adopt a normal mammary epithelial cell fate in vivo. Understanding of this phenomenon offers great promise for novel treatment and detection strategies in cancer, but current model systems make mechanistic insights into the process difficult. We have recently described a low-cost bioprinting platform designed to be accessible for basic cell biology laboratories. Here we report the use of this system for the study of tumorigenesis and microenvironmental redirection of breast cancer cells. We show our bioprinter significantly increases tumoroid formation in 3D collagen gels and allows for precise generation of tumoroid arrays. We also demonstrate that we can mimic published in vivo findings by co-printing cancer cells along with normal mammary epithelial cells to generate chimeric organoids. These chimeric organoids contain cancer cells that take part in normal luminal formation. Furthermore, we show for the first time that cancer cells within chimeric structures have a significant increase in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels as compared to bioprinted tumoroids. These results demonstrate the capacity of our 3D bioprinting platform to study tumorigenesis and microenvironmental control of breast cancer and highlight a novel mechanistic insight into the process of microenvironmental control of cancer.

10 October 2018 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJohn A. Reid
John A. Reid
PMPeter Mollica
Peter Mollica
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno
PSPatrick Sachs
Patrick Sachs
Standard three-dimensional (3D) in vitro culture techniques, such as those used for mammary epithelial cells, rely on random distribution of cells within hydrogels. Although these systems offer advantages over traditional 2D models, limitations persist owing to the lack of control over cellular placement within the hydrogel. This results in experimental inconsistencies and random organoid morphology. Robust, high-throughput experimentation requires greater standardization of 3D epithelial culture techniques. Here, we detail the use of a 3D bioprinting platform as an investigative tool to control the 3D formation of organoids through the “self-assembly” of human mammary epithelial cells. Experimental bioprinting procedures were optimized to enable the formation of controlled arrays of individual mammary organoids. We define the distance and cell number parameters necessary to print individual organoids that do not interact between print locations as well as those required to generate large contiguous organoids connected through multiple print locations. We demonstrate that as few as 10 cells can be used to form 3D mammary structures in a single print and that prints up to 500 μm apart can fuse to form single large structures. Using these fusion parameters, we demonstrate that both linear and non-linear (contiguous circles) can be generated with sizes of 3 mm in length/diameter. We confirm that cells from individual prints interact to form structures with a contiguous lumen. Finally, we demonstrate that organoids can be printed into human collagen hydrogels, allowing for all-human 3D culture systems. Our platform is adaptable to different culturing protocols and is superior to traditional random 3D culture techniques in efficiency, reproducibility, and scalability. Importantly, owing to the low-cost accessibility and computer numerical control–driven platform of our 3D bioprinter, we have the ability to disseminate our experiments with absolute precision to interested laboratories.

25 May 2012 in Cell and tissue research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPatrick Sachs
Patrick Sachs
MFMichael Francis
Michael Francis
MZMin Zhao
Min Zhao
JBJenni Brumelle
Jenni Brumelle
RRRaj R. Rao
Raj R. Rao
SHShawn E. Holt
Shawn E. Holt