Robert David Bruno

Robert David Bruno

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Robert David Bruno

School of Medical Diagnostic & Translational Sciences, Old Dominion University , Norfolk, VA 23508

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2007 in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno
Vincent NjarVincent Njar
Vincent Njar

1 September 2019 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPeter Mollica
Peter Mollica
EBElizabeth N. Booth-Creech
Elizabeth N. Booth-Creech
JRJohn A. Reid
John A. Reid
MZMartina Zamponi
Martina Zamponi
SSShea M. Sullivan
Shea M. Sullivan
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno

1 May 2011 in The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TVTadas S. Vasaitis
Tadas S. Vasaitis
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno
Vincent NjarVincent Njar
Vincent Njar

1 June 2016 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJohn A Reid
John A Reid
PMPeter Mollica
Peter Mollica
GJGarett D Johnson
Garett D Johnson
RORoy C Ogle
Roy C Ogle
RBRobert D Bruno
Robert D Bruno
PSPatrick Sachs
Patrick Sachs
The precision and repeatability offered by computer-aided design and computer-numerically controlled techniques in biofabrication processes is quickly becoming an industry standard. However, many hurdles still exist before these techniques can be used in research laboratories for cellular and molecular biology applications. Extrusion-based bioprinting systems have been characterized by high development costs, injector clogging, difficulty achieving small cell number deposits, decreased cell viability, and altered cell function post-printing. To circumvent the high-price barrier to entry of conventional bioprinters, we designed and 3D printed components for the adaptation of an inexpensive 'off-the-shelf' commercially available 3D printer. We also demonstrate via goal based computer simulations that the needle geometries of conventional commercially standardized, 'luer-lock' syringe-needle systems cause many of the issues plaguing conventional bioprinters. To address these performance limitations we optimized flow within several microneedle geometries, which revealed a short tapered injector design with minimal cylindrical needle length was ideal to minimize cell strain and accretion. We then experimentally quantified these geometries using pulled glass microcapillary pipettes and our modified, low-cost 3D printer. This systems performance validated our models exhibiting: reduced clogging, single cell print resolution, and maintenance of cell viability without the use of a sacrificial vehicle. Using this system we show the successful printing of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) into Geltrex and note their retention of a pluripotent state 7 d post printing. We also show embryoid body differentiation of hiPSC by injection into differentiation conducive environments, wherein we observed continuous growth, emergence of various evaginations, and post-printing gene expression indicative of the presence of all three germ layers. These data demonstrate an accessible open-source 3D bioprinter capable of serving the needs of any laboratory interested in 3D cellular interactions and tissue engineering.

28 July 2010 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBKaren Bussard
Karen Bussard
CBCorinne A. Boulanger
Corinne A. Boulanger
BBBrian W. Booth
Brian W. Booth
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno
GSGilbert H. Smith
Gilbert H. Smith
The tissue microenvironment directs stem/progenitor cell behavior. Cancer cells are also influenced by the microenvironment. It has been shown that, when placed into blastocysts, cancer cells respond to embryonic cues and differentiate according to the tissue type encountered during ontological development. Previously, we showed that the mouse mammary gland was capable of redirecting adult mouse testicular and neural stem/progenitor cells toward a mammary epithelial cell fate during gland regeneration. Here, we report that human embryonal carcinoma cells proliferate and produce differentiated mammary epithelial cell progeny when mixed with mouse mammary epithelial cells and inoculated into the epithelium-free mammary fat pads of athymic nude mice. Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of human cell progeny in the mammary outgrowths for human centromeric DNA, as well as immunochemistry for human-specific breast epithelial cytokeratins and human-specific milk proteins in impregnated transplant hosts. It was found that the number of human cells increased by 66- to 660-fold during mammary epithelial growth and expansion as determined by human cytokeratin expression. All features found in primary outgrowths were recapitulated in the secondary outgrowths from chimeric implants. These results show that human embryonal carcinoma–derived progeny interact with mouse mammary cells during mammary gland regeneration and are directed to differentiate into cells that exhibit diverse mammary epithelial cell phenotypes. This is the first demonstration that human cells are capable of recognizing the signals generated by the mouse mammary gland microenvironment present during gland regeneration in vivo. Cancer Res; 70(15); 6336–43. ©2010 AACR.

16 May 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJohn A. Reid
John A. Reid
XPXavier-Lewis Palmer
Xavier-Lewis Palmer
PMPeter Mollica
Peter Mollica
NNNicole Northam
Nicole Northam
PSPatrick Sachs
Patrick Sachs
RBRobert D. Bruno
Robert D. Bruno
The normal mammary microenvironment can suppress tumorigenesis and redirect cancer cells to adopt a normal mammary epithelial cell fate in vivo. Understanding of this phenomenon offers great promise for novel treatment and detection strategies in cancer, but current model systems make mechanistic insights into the process difficult. We have recently described a low-cost bioprinting platform designed to be accessible for basic cell biology laboratories. Here we report the use of this system for the study of tumorigenesis and microenvironmental redirection of breast cancer cells. We show our bioprinter significantly increases tumoroid formation in 3D collagen gels and allows for precise generation of tumoroid arrays. We also demonstrate that we can mimic published in vivo findings by co-printing cancer cells along with normal mammary epithelial cells to generate chimeric organoids. These chimeric organoids contain cancer cells that take part in normal luminal formation. Furthermore, we show for the first time that cancer cells within chimeric structures have a significant increase in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels as compared to bioprinted tumoroids. These results demonstrate the capacity of our 3D bioprinting platform to study tumorigenesis and microenvironmental control of breast cancer and highlight a novel mechanistic insight into the process of microenvironmental control of cancer.