Pedro Almeida Vinagre

Dr. Pedro Almeida Vinagre

WavEC Offshore Renewables
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pedro Almeida VinagrePedro Almeida Vinagre
Pedro Almeida Vinagre
TSTeresa Simas
Teresa Simas
ECErica Cruz
Erica Cruz
EPEmiliano Pinori
Emiliano Pinori
JSJohan Svenson
Johan Svenson
Biofouling is a major problem shared among all maritime sectors employing submerged structures where it leads to substantially increased costs and lowered operational lifespans if poorly addressed. Insight into the ongoing processes at the relevant marine locations is key to effective management of biofouling. Of specific concern for the marine renewable energy (MRE) sector is the fact that information on biofouling composition and magnitude across geographies is dispersed throughout published papers and consulting reports. To enable rapid access to relevant key biofouling events the present work describes a European biofouling database to support the MRE sector and other maritime industries. The database compiles in one document qualitative and quantitative data for challenging biofouling groups, including non-native species associated with MRE and related marine equipment, in different European Ecoregions. It provides information on the occurrence of fouling species and data on key biofouling parameters, such as biofouling thickness and weight. The database aims to aid the MRE sector and offshore industries in understanding which biofouling communities their devices are more susceptible to at a given site, to facilitate informed decisions. In addition, the biofouling mapping is useful for the development of biosecurity risk management plans as well as academic research.

1 April 2017 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pedro Almeida VinagrePedro Almeida Vinagre
Pedro Almeida Vinagre
HVHelena Veríssimo
Helena Veríssimo
APAntónia Juliana Pais-Costa
Antónia Juliana Pais-Costa
SHStephen John Hawkins
Stephen John Hawkins
BABorja Angel
Borja Angel
Joao M. NetoJoao M. Neto
Joao M. Neto

1 February 2016 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pedro Almeida VinagrePedro Almeida Vinagre
Pedro Almeida Vinagre
APAntónia Juliana Pais-Costa
Antónia Juliana Pais-Costa
RGRui Gaspar
Rui Gaspar
BABorja Angel
Borja Angel
JMJoão Carlos Marques
João Carlos Marques
Joao M. NetoJoao M. Neto
Joao M. Neto

6 April 2025 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EHElena Hengstmann
Elena Hengstmann
PCPablo Zapata Corella
Pablo Zapata Corella
KAKatharina Alter
Katharina Alter
MBMaria J. Belzunce-Segarra
Maria J. Belzunce-Segarra
ABAndy Booth
Andy Booth
BWBavo De Witte
Bavo De Witte
Offshore wind energy may offer many advantages: next to the aim of renewable energy production, offshore wind farms (OWFs) enable multi-purpose opportunities with nature conservation and aquaculture. OWFs may also affect the marine ecosystem. The environmental impact of OWFs is starting to be investigated regarding the effect of novel habitat introduction, underwater noise, electromagnetic fields, or exclusion of fisheries. However, the impact of chemical emissions from OWFs remains largely unknown. It is essential to account for these emissions at an early stage, to comprehensively assess the environmental impact with the objective of developing a future fit-for-purpose regulatory framework to protect the marine environment. This review compiled a literature-based list of potential OWF-related chemical emissions containing >200 organic and inorganic contaminants, including polymers. Compounds are categorised according to data source and emission type. Major gaps in assessing the impact of the compounds are identified, including challenges in environmental monitoring, numerical modelling and assessing the toxicity of individual and mixtures of chemical contaminants on marine organisms and humans consuming potential OWF aquaculture products. A risk-based prioritisation is essential to target the compounds of higher concern and overcome costs linked to assessing a wide variety of chemical contaminants. Although some countries have regulations to reduce OWF chemical emissions, standardized impact assessments or monitoring requirements for OWF-based chemical contaminants have not been established. This stresses the importance of providing more detailed information on occurrence, distribution and impact of OWF chemical emissions as an essential step towards sound ecosystem-based management of OWF installations.

1 November 2016 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pedro Almeida VinagrePedro Almeida Vinagre
Pedro Almeida Vinagre
APAntónia Juliana Pais-Costa
Antónia Juliana Pais-Costa
SHStephen. J. Hawkins
Stephen. J. Hawkins
ŸBŸngel Borja
Ÿngel Borja
JMJoão Carlos Marques
João Carlos Marques
Joao M. NetoJoao M. Neto
Joao M. Neto

1 December 2021 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAntónia Juliana Pais-Costa
Antónia Juliana Pais-Costa
MSMarta I. Sánchez
Marta I. Sánchez
MTMark A. Taggart
Mark A. Taggart
AGAndy J. Green
Andy J. Green
Francisco HortasFrancisco Hortas
Francisco Hortas
MMMónica Martinez-Haro
Mónica Martinez-Haro