A monkeypox outbreak is spreading in territories where the virus is not generally prevalent. The rapid and sudden emergence of monkeypox in numerous nations at the same time means that unreported transmission may have persisted. The number of reported cases is on a constant increase worldwide. At least 20 non-African countries, like Canada, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom, have reported more than 57662 as of September 9th suspected or confirmed cases. This is the largest epidemic seen outside of Africa. Scientists are struggling to determine the responsible genes for the higher virulence and transmissibility of the virus. Because the viruses are related, several countries have begun acquiring smallpox vaccinations, which are believed to be very effective against monkeypox. Bibliographic databases and web-search engines were used to retrieve studies that assessed monkeypox basic biology, life cycle, and transmission. Data were evaluated and used to explain the therapeutics that are under use or have potential. Finally, here is a comparison between how vaccines are being made now and how they were made in the past to stop the spread of new viruses. Available vaccines are believed to be effective if administered within four days of viral exposure, as the virus has a long incubation period. As the virus is zoonotic, there is still a great deal of concern about the viral genetic shift and the risk of spreading to humans. This review will discuss the virus's biology and how dangerous it is. It will also look at how it spreads, what vaccines and treatments are available, and what technologies could be used to make vaccines quickly using mRNA technologies.

To assess the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) among polypharmacy patients in Jordan using Lexicomp®. Additionally, this study aims to categorize and rate the identified pDDIs according to interaction risk, severity, and reliability. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at six different hospitals representing different public health sectors in Jordan (ministry of health, royal medical services, and university-affiliated hospitals). Polypharmacy patients from outpatient clinics (e.g., cardiology,& and internal medicine) were identified, recruited, and interviewed by clinical pharmacists. pDDIs were assessed using the Lexicomp® mobile application and classified according to interaction risk rating, severity, and reliability rating. Furthermore, the prevalence of pDDIs across chronic medical conditions was assessed. P-value <0.05 was considered as significant. A total of 801 patients with polypharmacy were identified. The average number of drugs per patient was 6.6 ± 1.96, with an average of 4.2 ± 3.0 pDDIs per patient. Potential drug-drug interactions were detected in 769 patients (96%), with a total of 3359 interactions. Blood pressure lowering agents were involved in 39.9% of the pDDIs. Cardiovascular system drugs contributed to the largest share of pDDIs (46.6%). While diuretics had the major share of interactions among cardiovascular system drugs (16.2%), drugs used in diabetes had the highest share across all groups (17.1%). The majority of pDDIs were of "C" risk rating with a moderate interaction severity, whilst 1.6% of pDDIs could have been avoided in the first place as the concurrent administration of these agents is contraindicated (i.e., risk rating X). Patients with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, and chronic kidney disease were associated with the highest number of potential drug-drug interactions. Our study showed that 96% of polypharmacy patients at outpatient clinics have at least one pDDI. Almost half of the detected interactions involved cardiovascular medications. The majority of these pDDIs had moderate severity, with no more than 10% of the interactions requiring therapy modification.

Objectives. This study aims to describe the prevalence and predictors for parental antibiotics self-medication of their children and to characterize the

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the content available on Facebook pharmacy groups in Jordan regarding the perception of the pharmacists’ role during the coronavirus pandemic in Jordan. Methods: Researchers identified Facebook pharmacy groups through the search engine on the Facebook website. The main search keywords were pharmacy, pharmacist, pharmacists, and Jordan using both Arabic and English. Two researchers analyzed the posts and discussion threads on local pharmacy Facebook groups in a period between March 20th and April 3rd. A total of 184 posts and threads were identified for the purpose of the study. Results: Identified threads and responses resulted in three overarching themes: pharmacists having a positive role during the pandemic, taking additional responsibilities and services, and having passive or negative roles. A positive role was seen in pharmacists acting as first-line healthcare providers, creating public’s awareness regarding COVID-19, and being responsible for chronic medication refill during the pandemic. Taking additional responsibilities was summarized in home deliveries and involvement in industrial and corporate efforts to deal with the pandemic. A passive/negative role was seen mostly among hospital pharmacists not being proactive during the pandemic and by pharmacists trying to maximize profits during pandemic time. Conclusions: Pharmacists perceived their role as a positive role during the coronavirus pandemic. Not only they took responsibilities for their daily services during the crises, but they took additional responsibilities to assure patient safety and satisfaction.

Background: With growing responsibility of the pharmacists in ensuring public health and safe medicine use, an understanding of the issues surrounding off-label prescribing is crucial to allow pharmacists to make informed decisions about such practice. The aim of this study is to assess the perceptions and attitudes of hospital based pharmacists toward off-label medicine dispensing to children. Methods: After obtaining the required approvals, a validated questionnaire about off-label dispensing to pediatric patients was administered to 250 randomly selected hospital pharmacists. Results: One hundred and fifty (150) completed questionnaires were returned. Less than half of the respondents (44%, n = 66) admitted to being familiar with the concept of off-label dispensing, claiming to have obtained this knowledge basically through their dispensing experience rather than education. A minority of respondents (36%, n = 54) reported dispensing off-label medicines within their practice knowingly. The majority of respondents had concerns regarding the efficacy (82%, n = 123) and safety (98%, n = 147) of off-label medicines. The most common reasons given by respondents for a dispensed prescription being off label were younger age than recommended (88%, n = 132). Most of respondents (94%, n = 141) claimed to double check the calculations of doses of medicines before dispensing off-label medicines and 60% (n = 90) of them felt that parents and guardians should be told when an off-label medicine has been prescribed for their children. Conclusion: The majority of respondents were not familiar with the concept of offlabel medicines. While reporting to have gained their knowledge from their professional experience, only a minority of respondents reported knowingly dispensing off-label medicines for pediatric patients. Respondents indicated that manufacturing more appropriate formulations for pediatric patients would reduce such practices in this population. Having concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of off-label medicines used for pediatric patients, respondents felt that the use of off-label medicines would increase the likelihood of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Finally, respondents felt that such practice of prescribing and dispensing should receive parental consent.