Background: Lung cancer screening is already implemented in the USA and strongly recommended by European Radiological and Thoracic societies as well. Upon implementation, the total number of thoracic computed tomographies (CT) is likely to rise significantly. As shown in previous studies, modern artificial intelligence-based algorithms are on-par or even exceed radiologist’s performance in lung nodule detection and classification. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an AI-based system in the context of baseline lung cancer screening. Methods: In this retrospective study, a decision model based on Markov simulation was developed to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs of the diagnostic modalities. Literature research was performed to determine model input parameters. Model uncertainty and possible costs of the AI-system were assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: In the base case scenario CT + AI resulted in a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as compared to CT only, showing lower costs and higher effectiveness. Threshold analysis showed that the ICER remained negative up to a threshold of USD 68 for the AI support. The willingness-to-pay of USD 100,000 was crossed at a value of USD 1240. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed model robustness for varying input parameters. Conclusion: Based on our results, the use of an AI-based system in the initial low-dose CT scan of lung cancer screening is a feasible diagnostic strategy from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

The differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a relevant diagnostic challenge and can lead to misdiagnosis and consequently poor patient outcome. Recent studies have shown that radiomics-based models can achieve high sensitivity and specificity in predicting both entities. However, radiomic features can only capture low level representations of the input image. In contrast, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can learn and extract more complex representations which have been used for image classification to great success. In our retrospective observational study, we performed a deep learning-based feature extraction using CT-scans of both entities and compared the predictive value against traditional radiomic features. In total, 86 patients, 44 with AIP and 42 with PDACs, were analyzed. Whole pancreas segmentation was automatically performed on CT-scans during the portal venous phase. The segmentation masks were manually checked and corrected if necessary. In total, 1411 radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics and 256 features (deep features) were extracted using an intermediate layer of a convolutional neural network (CNN). After feature selection and normalization, an extremely randomized trees algorithm was trained and tested using a two-fold shuffle-split cross-validation with a test sample of 20% (n = 18) to discriminate between AIP or PDAC. Feature maps were plotted and visual difference was noted. The machine learning (ML) model achieved a sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC of 0.89 ± 0.11, 0.83 ± 0.06, and 0.90 ± 0.02 for the deep features and 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.78 ± 0.06, and 0.80 ± 0.01 for the radiomic features. Visualization of feature maps indicated different activation patterns for AIP and PDAC. We successfully trained a machine learning model using deep feature extraction from CT-images to differentiate between AIP and PDAC. In comparison to traditional radiomic features, deep features achieved a higher sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC. Visualization of deep features could further improve the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive differentiation of AIP and PDAC.

To bridge the translational gap between recent discoveries of distinct molecular phenotypes of pancreatic cancer and tangible improvements in patient outcome, there is an urgent need to develop strategies and tools informing and improving the clinical decision process. Radiomics and machine learning approaches can offer non-invasive whole tumor analytics for clinical imaging data-based classification. The retrospective study assessed baseline computed tomography (CT) from 207 patients with proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Following expert level manual annotation, Pyradiomics was used for the extraction of 1474 radiomic features. The molecular tumor subtype was defined by immunohistochemical staining for KRT81 and HNF1a as quasi-mesenchymal (QM) vs. non-quasi-mesenchymal (non-QM). A Random Forest machine learning algorithm was developed to predict the molecular subtype from the radiomic features. The algorithm was then applied to an independent cohort of histopathologically unclassifiable tumors with distinct clinical outcomes. The classification algorithm achieved a sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.84 ± 0.05, 0.92 ± 0.01 and 0.93 ± 0.01, respectively. The median overall survival for predicted QM and non-QM tumors was 16.1 and 20.9 months, respectively, log-rank-test p = 0.02, harzard ratio (HR) 1.59. The application of the algorithm to histopathologically unclassifiable tumors revealed two groups with significantly different survival (8.9 and 39.8 months, log-rank-test p < 0.001, HR 4.33). The machine learning-based analysis of preoperative (CT) imaging allows the prediction of molecular PDAC subtypes highly relevant for patient survival, allowing advanced pre-operative patient stratification for precision medicine applications.

Background: To assess the performance of prospectively accelerated and deep learning (DL) reconstructed T2-weighted (T2w) imaging in volunteers and patients with histologically proven prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Prospectively undersampled T2w datasets were acquired with acceleration factors of 1.7 (reference), 3.4 and 4.8 in 10 healthy volunteers and 23 patients with histologically proven PCa. Image reconstructions using compressed SENSE (C-SENSE) and a combination of C-SENSE and DL-based artificial intelligence (C-SENSE AI) were analyzed. Qualitative image comparison was performed using a 6-point Likert scale (overall image quality, noise, motion artifacts, lesion detection, diagnostic certainty); the T2 and PI-RADS scores were compared between the two reconstructions. Additionally, quantitative image parameters were assessed (apparent SNR, apparent CNR, lesion size, line profiles). Results: All C-SENSE AI-reconstructed images received a significantly higher qualitative rating compared to the C-SENSE standard images. Analysis of the quantitative parameters supported this finding, with significantly higher aSNR and aCNR. The line profiles demonstrated a significantly steeper signal change at the border of the prostatic lesion and the adjacent normal tissue in the C-SENSE AI-reconstructed images, whereas the T2 and PI-RADS scores as well as the lesion size did not differ. Conclusion: In this prospective study, we demonstrated the clinical feasibility of a novel C-SENSE AI reconstruction enabling a 58% acceleration in T2w imaging of the prostate while obtaining significantly better image quality.

Exploring the generative capabilities of the multimodal GPT-4, our study uncovered significant differences between radiological assessments and automatic evaluation metrics for chest x-ray impression generation and revealed radiological bias.

Introduction: Radiomics and deep learning algorithms such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are increasingly used for radiological image classification and outcome prediction. One of the main challenges is to create robustness against technical alterations. Both methods initially extract specific imaging features, which are then used as input for machine learning algorithms or in an end-to-end fashion for outcome prediction. For radiomics features, it has previously been shown that differences in image acquisition parameters can cause variability in feature values, making them irreproducible. However, it remains unclear how these technical variations influence feature values extracted by a CNN. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the robustness of CNN features versus radiomics features to technical variations in image acquisition parameters. An additional retrospective analysis was performed to show the in vivo capabilities of these features compared with classical radiomics features in a tumor differentiation task. Materials and Methods: Imaging phantoms were scanned twice on 3 computed tomography scanners from 2 different manufactures with varying tube voltages and currents. Phantoms were segmented, and features were extracted using PyRadiomics and a pretrained CNN. After standardization the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), mean feature variance, feature range, and the coefficient of variant were calculated to assess feature robustness. In addition, the cosine similarity was calculated for the vectorized activation maps for an exemplary phantom. For the in vivo comparison, the radiomics and CNN features of 30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 30 patients with hepatic colon carcinoma metastasis were compared. Results: In total, 851 radiomics features and 256 CNN features were extracted for each phantom. For all phantoms, the global CCC of the CNN features was above 98%, whereas the highest CCC for the radiomics features was 36%. The mean feature variance and feature range was significantly lower for the CNN features. Using a coefficient of variant ≤0.2 as a threshold to define robust features and averaging across all phantoms 346 of 851 (41%) radiomics features and 196 of 256 (77%) CNN features were found to be robust. The cosine similarity was greater than 0.98 for all scanner and parameter variations. In the retrospective analysis, 122 of the 256 CNN (49%) features showed significant differences between HCC and hepatic colon metastasis. Discussion: Convolutional neural network features were more stable compared with radiomics features against technical variations. Moreover, the possibility of tumor entity differentiation based on CNN features was shown. Combined with visualization methods, CNN features are expected to increase reproducibility of quantitative image representations. Further studies are warranted to investigate the impact of feature stability on radiological image-based prediction of clinical outcomes.