Jing Li

Dr. Jing Li

School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jing LiJing Li
Jing Li
YDYuxiang Dong
Yuxiang Dong
ZLZhenhuan Liu
Zhenhuan Liu

21 March 2023 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xianfeng LiuXianfeng Liu
Xianfeng Liu
GSGaopeng Sun
Gaopeng Sun
ZFZheng Fu
Zheng Fu
PCPhil Ciais
Phil Ciais
Xiaoming FengXiaoming Feng
Xiaoming Feng
BFBojie Fu
Bojie Fu

1 May 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJingya Liu
Jingya Liu
Jing LiJing Li
Jing Li
KQKeyu Qin
Keyu Qin
ZZZixiang Zhou
Zixiang Zhou
XYXiaonan Yang
Xiaonan Yang
TLTing Li
Ting Li

1 February 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KQKeyu Qin
Keyu Qin
Jing LiJing Li
Jing Li
JLJingya Liu
Jingya Liu
LYLiwen Yan
Liwen Yan
HHHaijun Huang
Haijun Huang

1 January 2021 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CZCheng Zhang
Cheng Zhang
Jing LiJing Li
Jing Li
ZZZixiang Zhou
Zixiang Zhou
YSYijie Sun
Yijie Sun

KQKeyu Qin
Keyu Qin
Jing LiJing Li
Jing Li
XYXiaonan Yang
Xiaonan Yang
Natural ecosystems provide society with important goods and services. With rapidly increasing populations and excessive utilization of natural resources, humans have been enhancing the production of some services at the expense of others. Although the need for certain trade-offs between conservation and development is urgent, having only a small number of efficient methods to assess such trade-offs has impeded progress. This study focuses on the evaluation of ecosystem services under different land use schemes. It reveals the spatial and temporal distributions of and changes in ecosystem services. Based on a correlation rate model and distribution mapping, the trade-offs and synergies of these ecosystem services can be found. Here, we also describe a new simple approach to quantify the relationships of every trade-off and synergy. The results show that all ecosystem services possess trade-offs and synergies in the study area. The trend of improving carbon sequestration and water interception indicate that these key ecosystem services have the strongest synergy. And the decrease in regional agricultural production and other services, except water yield, may be considered as trade-offs. The synergy between water yield and agricultural production was the most significant, while the trade-off between water interception and carbon sequestration was the most apparent, according to our interaction quantification model. The results of this study have implications for planning and monitoring the future management of natural capital and ecosystem services, and can be integrated into land use decision-making.