Eyad Abushandi

Prof. Dr. Eyad Abushandi

Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 February 2013 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EAEyad Abushandi
Eyad Abushandi
BMBroder Merkel
Broder Merkel

1 January 2014 in Advances in Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAbdelrahman Osman Elfaki
Abdelrahman Osman Elfaki
SASaleh Alatawi
Saleh Alatawi
EAEyad Abushandi
Eyad Abushandi
Cost estimation is the most important preliminary process in any construction project. Therefore, construction cost estimation has the lion’s share of the research effort in construction management. In this paper, we have analysed and studied proposals for construction cost estimation for the last 10 years. To implement this survey, we have proposed and applied a methodology that consists of two parts. The first part concerns data collection, for which we have chosen special journals as sources for the surveyed proposals. The second part concerns the analysis of the proposals. To analyse each proposal, the following four questions have been set. Which intelligent technique is used? How have data been collected? How are the results validated? And which construction cost estimation factors have been used? From the results of this survey, two main contributions have been produced. The first contribution is the defining of the research gap in this area, which has not been fully covered by previous proposals of construction cost estimation. The second contribution of this survey is the proposal and highlighting of future directions for forthcoming proposals, aimed ultimately at finding the optimal construction cost estimation. Moreover, we consider the second part of our methodology as one of our contributions in this paper. This methodology has been proposed as a standard benchmark for construction cost estimation proposals.

1 March 2011 in Journal of Water and Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EAEyad Abushandi
Eyad Abushandi
BMBroder J. Merkel
Broder J. Merkel
With increasing stress on water resources in Jordan, application of rainfall-runoff models can be part of the solution to manage and sustain the water sector. In this paper, the metric conceptual IHACRES model is applied to the Wadi Dhuliel arid catchment, north-east Jordan. Rainfall-runoff data from 19 storm events during 1986 to 1992 have been used in this study. Flood estimation was performed on the basis of daily scales and storm events scales. The model was extended for snowfall in order to cope with such extreme events. Although the best performance of the IHACRES model on a daily basis is poor, the performance on storm events scale showed a good agreement between observed and simulated streamflow. Apart from model parameter values, the principal reasons for IHACRES model success in this region are thought to be based on antecedent soil moisture conditions, rainfall duration and rainfall intensity before and during each storm. The model outputs were likely to be sensitive when the monitored flood was relatively small. The optimum parameter values were influenced by the length of calibration data and event specific changes.

10 March 2016 in Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EAEyad Abushandi
Eyad Abushandi

4 March 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEyad Abushandi
Eyad Abushandi
AAA. Abualkishik
A. Abualkishik
The extended coastlines of Oman have been forced to change in the last few decades because of urbanization development or by natural disasters. Recently, Oman has suffered from a couple of tornados and cyclones, e.g. Cyclone Gonu on June 1, 2007, making the changes even much more dynamic. In order to protect the coastal regions infrastructure, an accurate estimation of shoreline erosion is required. This research paper presents an assessment of shoreline erosion magnitudes using field measurements coupled with Multiple Linear Regressions Models (MLR) to predict future changes. Inverse Distance Weighing and Kriging interpolation methods have been applied in order to visualize shoreline variations from gathered data prospective. The field measurements for the shoreline were taken at 19 different points, the space between the points in a range of 500–700 m approximately. The first field measurements were taken on 19th 20th 21st of June, 2016 while the second field measurements were taken on 14th 15th 16th of November 2016. Pearson correlation shows a strong relationship between the first and the second field trips with an average of 0.83. This significant relationship ensures the applicability of MLRs to project future changes on the shorelines. The results of the MLRs showed severe negative volumetric shoreline erosion with an average of 5.2 m/year with some exceptions at the catchment outlets.

28 October 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEyad Abushandi
Eyad Abushandi
MAManar Al Ajmi
Manar Al Ajmi
The objective of this research was to analyse hydrological variability by conducting an intensive analysis of extreme events, under dry and wet conditions. Drought conditions were assessed using the Standard Precipitation Index (SPI) and Rainfall Anomaly Index (RAI), while the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) method was used to simulate flooding at four stations. The SPI results indicated that the amount of rainfall within the catchment area is near to normal, ranging from 64% to 75%, with some extremely wet exceptions which may cause flash floods. The RAI results also indicated that the amount of rainfall within the catchment area is near to normal, but the extremely wet category obtained the largest percentage (ranging from 36% to 50%) and the very wet category had the lowest percentage (ranging from 9% to 36%). The simulated flooding, using SCS, tended to slightly underestimate the observed streamflow, while the performance showed some weaknesses when the observed flooding was less than 1 m3/s. The Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency showed higher performance at closer rainfall stations to the outlet, with values of 0.92 and 0.94. Distant stations simulated floods that showed a lower level of efficiency, with values of 0.77 and 0.81. Given the fact that hydrological extremes (dry and wet conditions) are connected, the findings of the two indices and the SCS method are consistent and suitable for monitoring drought and flood events under climate change.