Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF+) tissue regeneration therapy on clinical periodontal parameters in non-smokers and smoker patients. The anticipated biological mechanisms of A-PRF+ include stimulating angiogenesis, thereby promoting the formation of new blood vessels, which is essential for tissue healing. Additionally, A-PRF+ harnesses the regenerative properties of platelet-rich fibrin, contributing to the repair and regeneration of periodontal tissues. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 55 patients, divided into two groups: non-smoker patients (n = 29) and smoker patients (n = 26). A single operator conducted the surgical procedure. Following the administration of local anesthesia with articaine 4% with adrenaline 1:100,000 precise intracrevicular incisions were made, extending towards the adjacent teeth, until the interproximal spaces, with meticulous attention to conserving the interdental gingival tissue to the greatest extent possible. Extended, full-thickness vestibular and oral flaps were carefully lifted, and all granulation tissue was meticulously removed from the defect without altering the bone contour. After debridement of the defects, A-PRF+ was applied. BOP (bleeding on probing), PI (plaque index), CAL (clinical attachment loss), and probing depth (PD) were determined at baseline and six months post-surgery. Results: Significant reductions were observed in PD and CAL after six months. In the non-smokers group, PD decreased from 7.0 ± 1.0 mm to 3.1 ± 0.1 mm (p < 0.001), while in the smokers group, PD decreased from 6.9 ± 1.1 mm to 3.9 ± 0.3 mm (p < 0.001). CAL decreased in the non-smokers group from 5.8 ± 0.7 mm to 2.6 ± 0.2 mm and from 5.7 ± 0.9 mm to 3.2 ± 0.2 mm (p < 0.001) in smokers. Notably, the reductions in CAL and PD were statistically more significant in the non-smokers group. Conclusions: Even though the clinical periodontal improvements were considerable in smoker patients, they did not reach the level observed in non-smoker patients.

Different methods and products have been investigated as measures of adjunctive therapy to scaling and root planing (SRP). Probiotic use has gained interest for this particular application, especially Lactobacillus spp. This split-mouth interventional prospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of L. reuteri DSM 17938 with local application in periodontal pockets of severe periodontitis patients. The study was conducted on 40 subjects with stage 3–4 periodontitis who, based on a split-mouth model, followed SRP and SRP + L. reuteri solution in five weekly sessions. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline and at three months after probiotic treatment completion. Both SRP and SRP + L. reuteri generated significant improvements of all three clinical parameters, but the changes were significantly better for SRP + L. reuteri treated sites. Therefore, we can conclude that adjunctive therapy with L. reuteri DSM 17938 could represent an interesting treatment option, particularly for severe periodontitis cases.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the role of A-PRF (advanced platelet-rich fibrin) in the enhancement of wound healing and protecting the periodontal health of mandibular second molars after the extraction of mandibular third molars. Additionally, the study assessed the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of mandibular second molars as markers of inflammation. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five systemically healthy adult patients with bilateral removal of impacted mandibular third molars were included. Each patient received A-PRF in one extraction site, while the contralateral site served as a control. Periodontal parameters of the adjacent second molar, including probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL), were measured in distal–vestibular (DV) and distal–lingual (DL) sites. Pain, swelling, and overall healing were subjectively evaluated. Levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in the GCF were analyzed. Evaluations occurred at baseline and three months post-surgery. Results: A-PRF significantly improved PD (from 4.69 ± 0.61 mm to 3.85 ± 0.34 mm in DV, and from 4.71 ± 0.65 mm to 3.79 ± 0.27 mm in DL, respectively) and CAL (from 2.41 ± 0.25 mm to 1.82 ± 0.21 mm in DV, and from 2.40 ± 0.36 mm to 1.75 ± 0.19 mm in DL, respectively) of the adjacent second molar, compared to control sites, three months post-surgery. Pain and swelling scores were notably lower on the 7th postoperative day in the A-PRF group. A-PRF also reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines in GCF, significantly more than in control sites, at three months post-surgery. Conclusions: A-PRF enhances the periodontal and inflammatory status of adjacent teeth and wound healing after the extraction of mandibular third molars.

Dental amalgam remains widely used in restorative dentistry due to its durability and cost-effectiveness, yet concerns persist regarding potential biological effects related to mercury release. This narrative review critically synthesizes current evidence on oral mucosal alterations and salivary biomarker changes reported in association with amalgam restorations. Experimental research supports biological plausibility for oxidative and inflammatory responses to mercury exposure; however, most human evidence derives from observational studies demonstrating heterogeneous associations rather than consistent causal relationships. Reported variations in salivary biomarkers, including interleukin-8 and ceruloplasmin, are generally modest and influenced by confounding factors such as periodontal status, smoking, and systemic inflammation. Histopathological findings adjacent to amalgam restorations include epithelial and inflammatory changes, though many are nonspecific and comparable to other chronic irritative conditions. Overall, current clinical and epidemiological data do not indicate uniform or clinically significant adverse effects in the general population attributable solely to dental amalgam. Regulatory phase-down initiatives primarily reflect environmental and precautionary policies. Available evidence supports a balanced and evidence-based interpretation of amalgam-related biological findings in contemporary dental practice.

Background and Objectives: Prolonged contact between oral mucosa and dental amalgam restorations may influence local epithelial homeostasis, but the remodeling profile of clinically non-dysplastic mucosa exposed to long-standing amalgam remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to evaluate histopathological changes and CK19, Ki67, and p53 expression in the oral mucosa adjacent to long-term amalgam restorations. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was performed on 108 oral mucosal specimens, including 78 samples in direct contact with amalgam restorations and 30 non-exposed controls. Exposed cases were grouped according to contact duration: 5–10 years, 11–20 years, and ≥21 years. Histopathological parameters and immunohistochemical expression of CK19, Ki67, and p53 were semi-quantitatively assessed, and an exploratory Integrated Epithelial Remodeling Score was calculated. Results: Longer amalgam exposure was significantly associated with increased inflammatory infiltrate, basal hyperplasia, acanthosis, fibrosis, suprabasal CK19 redistribution, and higher Ki67 labeling indices. The Integrated Epithelial Remodeling Score differed significantly among exposure groups, with higher values in intermediate- and long-duration exposure categories. p53 expression showed statistically detectable but heterogeneous variation. No epithelial dysplasia was observed. Conclusions: Long-term contact with dental amalgam restorations was associated with a coordinated, non-dysplastic remodeling phenotype of the oral mucosa. Given the age imbalance across exposure duration groups, these findings should be interpreted as exposure-associated patterns rather than evidence of a direct causal effect. Because no comparison group exposed to other restorative materials was included, material-specificity for dental amalgam cannot be inferred. In architecturally preserved mucosa, suprabasal CK19 expression may reflect adaptive epithelial plasticity rather than preneoplastic transformation.

Background and Objectives: This study evaluated the outcomes of single open-flap debridement, open-flap debridement (OFD) plus resorbable membrane placement, and OFD with resorbable membrane placement plus platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in terms of periodontal clinical parameters and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in 24 adult patients with stage 3 grade C periodontitis and type II diabetes mellitus. Materials and Methods: The primary outcome measure for this study was the clinical attachment level (CAL); secondary outcomes included additional periodontal parameters, such as the plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), as well as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels to evaluate the systemic impact of the treatments on glycemic control. The parameters were assessed before and at three and six months post-surgery. In Group A, the flap was sutured closed; in Group B, an absorbable collagen membrane was placed over the defect; and in Group C, PRF was utilized in the defect, with two additional PRF membranes used to cover the defect. The wound healing index (WHI) was recorded at 7 and 14 days after the surgery. Results: The initial findings indicated no significant differences in the periodontal parameters among the three groups. However, improvements in the PD and CAL were most notable in Group C, followed by Group B, with Group A showing the slightest improvement. At six months, there was a highly significant difference in the CAL (p < 0.001). Group C (4.92 ± 0.35) and Group B (4.99 ± 0.31) demonstrated the most significant improvements in the CAL compared to Group A (5.89 ± 0.57). At seven days post-surgery, Group C demonstrated significant healing, with 85% of the sites showing complete healing. By the 14-day mark, all sites in Group C indicated complete healing. Although the HbA1c values did not exhibit statistically significant differences among the groups at baseline, at the 6-month evaluation, all groups showed significantly lower values than baseline. However, the comparison between groups revealed significantly improved values for Group C. Conclusions: The study’s results suggest that PRF is an exceptional material for infrabony defects treatment and notably improves HbA1c levels.