Alexandru Vasile Oancea

Mr. Alexandru Vasile Oancea

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 October 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexandru Vasile OanceaAlexandru Vasile Oancea
Alexandru Vasile Oancea
Nadia Ionescu (Belu)Nadia Ionescu (Belu)
Nadia Ionescu (Belu)
CORNELIU RONTESCUCORNELIU RONTESCU
CORNELIU RONTESCU
Laurentiu-Mihai IonescuLaurentiu-Mihai Ionescu
Laurentiu-Mihai Ionescu
AMAgnieszka Misztal
Agnieszka Misztal
PVPirvu Valentin
Pirvu Valentin
This paper presents the application of the 8D method to a case study in the automotive industry, combined with the development of a pilot framework that integrates Industry 4.0 technologies—Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and advanced IT tools. Unlike traditional 8D implementations, the proposed solution introduces several innovations: (i) AI-based complaint analysis with automated keyword detection and classification and localization of batches in the warehouses achieving a 100% accuracy rate in categorizing root causes; (ii) IoT-enabled non-invasive monitoring of production parameters for tests and logs, reducing fault rate to 0 for current case study; (iii) digital cataloging and storage of corrective and preventive actions, improving retrieval speed of past solutions by 300 times (from 300 min to less than 1 min); and (iv) automated reporting tools, cutting the report preparation time from hours to minutes. Through these contributions, the system enhances both responsiveness and prevention, leading to an observed 100% reduction in fault recurrence associated with current case study and an estimated 75% decrease in customer complaints regarding defects occurring throughout the production sector where the pilot was implemented. In addition to the practical improvements, this work extends the literature on digitalized quality management by demonstrating how the 8D methodology can be effectively re-engineered with Industry 4.0 components. Comparative analysis against the enterprise’s conventional 8D system and against recent alternative approaches confirms that our framework provides measurable benefits in the speed, accuracy, and sustainability of problem-solving processes.

16 December 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKinga Ratajszczak
Kinga Ratajszczak
Alexandru Vasile OanceaAlexandru Vasile Oancea
Alexandru Vasile Oancea
AMAgnieszka Misztal
Agnieszka Misztal
Nadia Ionescu (Belu)Nadia Ionescu (Belu)
Nadia Ionescu (Belu)
Laurentiu-Mihai IonescuLaurentiu-Mihai Ionescu
Laurentiu-Mihai Ionescu
AWAnna Wencek
Anna Wencek
The main purpose of the article is to demonstrate how large language models (LLMs) can enhance and automate the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method to improve the identification, assessment, and management of operational risk in modern technological systems. The study aims to show that integrating AI into FMEA increases the efficiency, precision, and reliability of detecting potential failures and evaluating their consequences, provided that expert supervision and model transparency are maintained. The research combines a literature review with a case study using OpenAI’s model to generate an automated FMEA for a manufacturing process. The methodology defines process components, identifies potential failure modes, and evaluates their risk impact. Five specialized libraries—structure, function, failure, risk, and optimization—serve as structured inputs for the LLM. A feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from previous analyses, improving future risk assessments and supporting continuous process optimization. The developed platform enables engineers to initiate projects, input data, generate and validate AI-based FMEA reports, and export results. Overall, the study demonstrates that the integration of LLMs into FMEA can transform operational risk management, making it more intelligent, adaptive, and data-driven.

30 November 2024 in Journal of Research and Innovation for Sustainable Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNational University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Alexandru Vasile OanceaAlexandru Vasile Oancea
Alexandru Vasile Oancea
CORNELIU RONTESCUCORNELIU RONTESCU
CORNELIU RONTESCU
ABAna-Maria Bogatu
Ana-Maria Bogatu
DCDumitru-Titi Cicic
Dumitru-Titi Cicic
Laser cutting is a computer numerically controlled process widely used in the automotive industry for cutting metal materials needed to manufacture parts used in automobile production. The production process represents all the conscious actions of a company's employees carried out with the help of various machines, equipment, or installations on raw materials, materials, or other components to transform them into products or services with a certain market value. The Ishikawa diagram, also known as the cause-and-effect diagram, is often used in industrial process analysis, defect prevention, and product design processes. The paper presents the results of the research conducted on the use of the Ishikawa diagram in analyzing the causes that lead to negative effects in the laser cutting process of S235JRH structural steel pipes. After defining the problem, by applying the "WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, HOW MUCH, HOW, WHY" method, all possible causes were identified using the "5 Whys" method. The analysis identified 11 probable causes, and through further analysis, it was concluded that 3 of them were already present in the process, influencing the laser cutting of the pipes and generating quality problems. All the identified causes built the Ishikawa diagram consisting of 7Ms.

9 March 2026 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexandru Vasile OanceaAlexandru Vasile Oancea
Alexandru Vasile Oancea
Laurentiu-Mihai IonescuLaurentiu-Mihai Ionescu
Laurentiu-Mihai Ionescu
CORNELIU RONTESCUCORNELIU RONTESCU
CORNELIU RONTESCU
Nadia Ionescu (Belu)Nadia Ionescu (Belu)
Nadia Ionescu (Belu)
AMAgnieszka Misztal
Agnieszka Misztal
ESElena-Manuela Stanciu
Elena-Manuela Stanciu
The paper presents the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method applied to a process-based case study, together with an approach for implementing the AIAG & VDA harmonized FMEA standard by using modern digital tools. While classical FMEA is widely used in the industry, risk assessment based on the Risk Priority Number (RPN) often leads to the inconsistent ranking of failures and unclear prioritization of corrective actions. This paper explores the shift from the traditional Risk Priority Number (RPN) approach to the Action Priority (AP) concept introduced in the AIAG & VDA FMEA Handbook and explains why this change leads to clearer, more consistent risk-based decisions. Rather than focusing only on the methodological differences, the paper also outlines a practical framework for full implementation, showing how Industry 4.0 technologies can strengthen traceability, improve response time, and ensure greater consistency in PFMEA development. It also examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) can support engineers in everyday practice—for example, by helping identify potential failure modes, standardizing documentation, and guiding the definition of prevention and detection controls. In parallel, IoT-based monitoring and real-time data collection can provide valuable feedback to validate occurrence and detection ratings. Over time, this data-driven feedback loop can improve the accuracy and reliability of risk assessments. The proposed framework contributes to improved responsiveness in process optimization activities, reduces the probability of recurring failures, and supports continuous quality improvement in manufacturing organizations. The solution is discussed in relation to classical FMEA practices and recent trends in the digital transformation of quality management systems.

1 July 2025 in Romanian Journal of Transport Infrastructure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAna-Maria Bogatu
Ana-Maria Bogatu
DCDumitru - Titi Cicic
Dumitru - Titi Cicic
CMComan Mihăiță-Nicolae
Coman Mihăiță-Nicolae
CORNELIU RONTESCUCORNELIU RONTESCU
CORNELIU RONTESCU
Alexandru Vasile OanceaAlexandru Vasile Oancea
Alexandru Vasile Oancea
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a method commonly used in activities with the main objective of finding measures to improve manufacturing processes or products, by identifying actual and potential ways in which components fail or processes malfunction. The paper presents the practical application of the FMEA method for the process of obtaining an important component of the resistance system of a motor vehicle, namely a chassis. Some general information is presented on the importance of the FMEA method, the product analyzed, followed by the practical application of the method, starting from the determination of the probable causes of failure and their effects on: the organization, the customer and the end user. The processes carried out to obtain the chassis are identified and for a category of processes the Severity (S), Occurrence (O), Detection (D) and Risk Priority Number (RPN) indicators are calculated. Also, the preventive control methods and the control methods to be applied to reduce the occurrence of the defect are identified and indicated.