Anna Ortega Martínez

Prof. Anna Ortega Martínez

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Andoni Carrasco-UribarrenAndoni Carrasco-Uribarren
Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren
AMAnna Ortega Martínez
Anna Ortega Martínez
Marta Amor-BarbosaMarta Amor-Barbosa
Marta Amor-Barbosa
AAAïda Cadellans Arróniz
Aïda Cadellans Arróniz
Sara Cabanillas-BareaSara Cabanillas-Barea
Sara Cabanillas-Barea
Caritat Bagur-CalafatCaritat Bagur-Calafat
Caritat Bagur-Calafat
Background: Sedentary behaviors have increased in recent years and their consequences have led the World Health Organization to make recommendations for promoting a more active lifestyle. The school environment has been defined as a key place for achieving this objective for children and adolescents. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the effect of active-break interventions for interrupting prolonged sitting times during school-time on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB), at school, in childhood and youth. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out, including clinical trials aimed at assessing the effects of interrupting prolonged sitting at school with active breaks on in-school PA and/or SB. Multimodal and static interventions were excluded. Six databases were analyzed: Medline, WOS, Cochrane Library, SPORT Discus, CINAHL and EMBASE. PA, SB; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were the variables considered. Results: Nine studies were included, with a total of 2145 children between 6 and 12 years old. The heterogeneity in the duration (five–sixty min), the frequency (one–three times per-day up to three times per week), and duration (five days to three years) of the interventions was detected. The meta-analyses for in-school PA, MVPA, and SB were performed, showing a significant improvement in both PA and MVPA. Conclusions: Interrupting prolonged sitting with active-based school interventions could improve PA and MVPA levels during school time. (PROSPERO: CRD42022358933).

Marta Amor-BarbosaMarta Amor-Barbosa
Marta Amor-Barbosa
AMAnna Ortega Martínez
Anna Ortega Martínez
Andoni Carrasco-UribarrenAndoni Carrasco-Uribarren
Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren
Caritat Bagur-CalafatCaritat Bagur-Calafat
Caritat Bagur-Calafat
Background: Sedentary behavior (SB) is a negative routine for health, especially during advancing age. Promoting an active lifestyle and reducing SB is a global endeavor. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of active school-based programs to interrupt prolonged sitting for daily physical activity (PA) and daily SB in children and adolescents. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Clinical trials analyzing the effect of interrupting prolonged sitting with active breaks and classroom-based PA were included. Studies that implemented PA in class without interrupting prolonged sitting or those that implemented multimodal interventions were excluded. A systematic search was conducted in 6 databases: Medline, WOS, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and EMBASE. Primary outcomes were daily PA and daily SB, while moderate-to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was considered a secondary outcome. Results: Six studies were included, with a total of 976 participants between 6–14 years. The interventions were heterogeneous in duration of the sitting time interruption (5–30 min), frequency (1–3 times per-day up to three times per-week) and total duration (five days to three years). 50% of the studies scored “high risk” of bias. Three meta-analyses were performed for daily PA, MVPA and SB, showing a significant improvement in the daily PA and MVPA. Conclusions: School-based programs aimed to interrupt prolonged sitting could be a good strategy to improve daily PA and MVPA levels. (Registration number: CRD42022358933).

8 May 2023 in Acta Paediatrica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sara Cabanillas-BareaSara Cabanillas-Barea
Sara Cabanillas-Barea
SJSandra Jiménez-del-Barrio
Sandra Jiménez-del-Barrio
Andoni Carrasco-UribarrenAndoni Carrasco-Uribarren
Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren
AMAnna Ortega Martínez
Anna Ortega Martínez
SPSilvia Pérez‐Guillén
Silvia Pérez‐Guillén
LLLuis Ceballos Laita
Luis Ceballos Laita
Aim: Osteopathy and chiropractic techniques are used for babies for different reasons, but it is unclear how effective they are. The aim of this study was to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing crying time and increasing sleeping time in babies with infantile colic.Methods: A systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted on infantile colic studies that used complementary and alternative medicine techniques as interventions. The outcome measures were hours spent crying and/or sleeping. We used the PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Osteopathic Medicine Digital Database and Google Scholar databases from inception to 11 November 2022.Results: The methodological quality of the randomised control trials ranged from fair to high. We focused on five studies with 422 babies. Complementary treatments failed to decrease the crying time (mean difference −1.08, 95% CI: −2.17 to 0.01, I2 = 92%) and to increase sleeping time (mean difference 1.11, 95% CI: −0.20 to 2.41; I2: 91%), compared with no intervention. The quality of the evidence was rated as very low for both outcome measures.Conclusion: Osteopathy and chiropractic treatment failed to reduce the crying time and increase sleeping time in babies with infantile colic, compared with no additional intervention.

31 May 2021 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marta Amor-BarbosaMarta Amor-Barbosa
Marta Amor-Barbosa
MGMontserrat Girabent-Farrés
Montserrat Girabent-Farrés
FRFerran Rosés-Noguer
Ferran Rosés-Noguer
AMAnna Ortega Martínez
Anna Ortega Martínez
AMAlmudena Medina-Rincón
Almudena Medina-Rincón
Caritat Bagur-CalafatCaritat Bagur-Calafat
Caritat Bagur-Calafat
Childhood is a critical period in the development and consolidation of healthy habits, such as the practice of physical activity (PA). It is essential to have valid instruments to measure PA from an early age. The aim of this study was to design and evaluate the content validity of the Physical Activity Questionnaire-Young Children (PAQ-YC) to measure the PA level in children aged 5–7 years. The first version of the questionnaire was tested by a 2-round Delphi study. It was established as a consensus criterion that the relative interquartile range (RIR) and/or the coefficient of variation (CV) were ≤20%. The most significant discrepancies in the Delphi survey (n = 11–13) were observed for items about hours of Physical Education or similar activities at school (item 7: RIR = 20, CV = 38.73) and for items about participation in Physical Education (item 8: RIR = 25, CV = 15.45). The cognitive interviews (n = 5) confirmed the version agreed by the experts. The results show that the PAQ-YC presents adequate content validity in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility.

19 June 2023 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAnna Ortega Martínez
Anna Ortega Martínez
RPRocio Palomo-Carrión
Rocio Palomo-Carrión
CVCarlos Varela-Ferro
Carlos Varela-Ferro
Caritat Bagur-CalafatCaritat Bagur-Calafat
Caritat Bagur-Calafat
Children with Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy (US CP) have motor and somatosensory impairments that affect one side of their body, impacting upper limb functioning. These impairments contribute negatively to children’s bimanual performance and quality of life. Intensive home-based therapies have been developed and have demonstrated their feasibility for children with US CP and their parents, especially when therapies are designed with the proper coaching of families. Mirror Therapy (MT) is being studied to become an approachable intensive and home-based therapy suitable for children with US CP. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of a five-week home-based program of MT for children with US CP that includes coaching by the therapist. Six children aged 8–12 years old performed the therapy for five days per week, 30 min per day. A minimum of 80% of compliance was required. The feasibility included compliance evaluations, total dosage, perceived difficulty of the exercises, and losses of follow-ups. All children completed the therapy and were included in the analysis. The total accomplishment was 86.47 ± 7.67. The perceived difficulty of the exercises ranged from 2.37 to 4.51 out of 10. In conclusion, a home-based program of Mirror Therapy is a safe, cost-efficient, and feasible therapy for children with US CP when the therapist is involved as a coach during the entire program.

27 June 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAnna Ortega Martínez
Anna Ortega Martínez
RPRocio Palomo-Carrión
Rocio Palomo-Carrión
Andoni Carrasco-UribarrenAndoni Carrasco-Uribarren
Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren
Marta Amor-BarbosaMarta Amor-Barbosa
Marta Amor-Barbosa
GDGeorgina Domènech-Garcia
Georgina Domènech-Garcia
Caritat Bagur-CalafatCaritat Bagur-Calafat
Caritat Bagur-Calafat
Background: Mirror therapy (MT) creates a cerebral illusion of a normal movement in a paretic limb. Although mirror therapy has been studied as a suitable intervention for children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (UCP), a comprehensive understanding of its full range of benefits is still lacking. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine all motor and sensory effects of MT in children and adolescents with UCP. Methods: Clinical trials focused on the application of MT in the upper limb (UL) of children and adolescents with UCP were included. A search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and LILACS databases. Eleven studies were included in this systematic review. The PEDro scale and the MINORS scale were applied to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, respectively. The Risk of Bias tool was also employed to evaluate the potential bias. In addition, the TIDieR checklist was used to assess the quality of intervention reporting. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Results: The studies included children with UCP from three to eighteen years, classified in Manual Ability Classification System levels I–IV. Motor effects of MT were found in nine studies. Also, two studies reported sensory effects on registration, perception, and proprioception abilities. Qualitative and quantitative analysis showed that MT improved manual dexterity and tactile registration in children and adolescents with UCP. Conclusions: MT is a therapy capable of inducing motor and sensory improvements in the affected UL of children with UCP.