The novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, is a highly contagious infectious disease declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic and a global public health emergency. During outbreaks, health care workers are submitted to an enormous emotional burden as they must balance the fundamental “duty to treat” with their parallel duties to family and loved ones. The aims of our study were to evaluate disease perceptions, levels of stress, emotional distress, and coping strategies among medical staff (COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 departments) in a tertiary pulmonology teaching hospital in the first month after the outbreak of COVID-19. One hundred and fifteen health care workers completed four validated questionnaires (the brief illness perception questionnaire, perceived stress scale, the profile of emotional distress emotional, and the cognitive coping evaluation questionnaire) that were afterwards interpreted by one psychologist. There was a high level of stress and psychological distress among health care workers in the first month after the pandemic outbreak. Interestingly, there were no differences between persons that worked in COVID-19 departments versus those working in non-COVID-19 departments. Disease perceptions and coping mechanisms were similar in the two groups. As coping mechanisms, refocusing on planning and positive reappraisal were used more than in the general population. There is no difference in disease perceptions, levels of stress, emotional distress, and coping strategies in medical staff handling COVID-19 patients versus those staff who were not handling COVID-19 patients in the first month after the pandemic outbreak.

Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is considered the “gold” standard radiological method in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the correlation between two transthoracic lung ultrasound (LUS) scores (total number of B-lines score = the total sum of B-lines in 10 predefined scanning sites and total number of positive chest areas score = intercostal spaces with ≥3 B-lines) and the features in HRCT simplified scores, in different interstitial disorders, between LUS scores and symptoms, as well as between LUS scores and pulmonary function impairment. We have evaluated 58 consecutive patients diagnosed with ILD. We demonstrated that there was a good correlation between the total number of B-lines score and the HRCT simplified score (r = 0.784, p < 0.001), and also a good correlation between the total number of positive chest areas score and the HRCT score (r = 0.805, p < 0.005). The results confirmed the value of using LUS as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of ILD compared to HRCT. The use of LUS in ILD patients can be a useful, cheap, accessible and radiation-free investigation and can play a complementary role in the diagnosis and monitoring of these patients.

Background and Objectives: Ward-level risk in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is often estimated from static admission data. This study evaluated a pragmatic composite—TRIAD-TB—integrating physiology (SpO₂, respiratory rate), inflammation (systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], C-reactive protein [CRP]), and nutrition (BMI, albumin), augmented by 72 h changes in CRP and albumin, to predict 30-day mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Methods: A pooled prospective cohort of 126 HIV-negative adults without chronic systemic immunosuppression hospitalized with culture-confirmed pulmonary TB at two Romanian tertiary centers was analyzed. TRIAD-TB combined z-scored admission markers and 72 h deltas. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included LOS. Associations were estimated using Firth logistic regression (mortality) and quasi-Poisson regression (LOS). Discrimination and overall performance were summarized by AUC and Brier score; internal performance used bootstrap optimism-correction. Results: Across TRIAD-TB tertiles, 30-day mortality increased from 2.4% to 16.7%, and mean LOS rose from 24.7 ± 5.8 to 32.1 ± 7.3 days. Each SD increase in TRIAD-TB was associated with higher odds of death (adjusted OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.8; p = 0.006) and longer hospitalization (adjusted IRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.30; p < 0.001). The full model discriminated mortality well (AUC 0.84; Brier 0.067) and explained 21.8% of LOS deviance. Early dynamics were informative: higher CRP ratio (72 h/0 h) and albumin decline tracked with adverse outcomes. An admission-only “mini-TRIAD” retained strong discrimination (AUC 0.79). Conclusions: A dynamic composite leveraging routine vitals and laboratory tests—plus 72 h trajectories—accurately stratified short-term risk in hospitalized pulmonary TB, while an admission-only “mini-TRIAD” retained strong discrimination. Together, these tools may support early escalation, targeted monitoring, and capacity planning. TRIAD-TB may support early escalation, targeted monitoring, and capacity planning; however, because it was derived in HIV-negative, non-immunosuppressed adults in an Eastern European setting, TRIAD-TB and the admission-only “mini-TRIAD” require external validation, including in cohorts with substantial HIV co-infection and different comorbidity profiles, before any broader implementation.

Background and Objectives: Blood-borne inflammatory ratios have been proposed as inexpensive prognostic tools across a range of diseases, but their role in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains uncertain. In this retrospective case–control analysis, we explored whether composite indices derived from routine haematology—namely the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the systemic immune–inflammation index (SII) and a novel CRP–Fibrinogen Index (CFI)—could enhance risk stratification beyond established cytokine measurements among Romanian adults with culture-confirmed pulmonary T. Materials and Methods: Data were drawn from 80 consecutive TB in-patients and 50 community controls. Full blood counts, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and four multiplex cytokines were extracted from electronic records, and composite indices were calculated according to standard formulas. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality within 90 days and length of stay (LOS). Results: Among TB patients, the median NLR was 3.70 (IQR 2.54–6.14), PLR was 200 (140–277) and SII was 1.36 × 10⁶ µL⁻¹ (0.74–2.34 × 10⁶), compared with 1.8 (1.4–2.3), 117 (95–140) and 0.46 × 10⁶ µL⁻¹ (0.30–0.60 × 10⁶) in controls. Those with SII above the cohort median exhibited more pronounced acute-phase responses (median CRP 96 vs. 12 mg L⁻¹; fibrinogen 578 vs. 458 mg dL⁻¹), yet median LOS remained virtually identical (29 vs. 28 days) and early mortality was low in both groups (8% vs. 2%). The CFI showed no clear gradient in hospital stay across its quartiles, and composite ratios—while tightly inter-correlated—demonstrated only minimal association with cytokine levels and LOS. Conclusions: Composite cell-count indices were markedly elevated but did not predict early death or prolonged admission. In low-event European cohorts, their chief value may lie in serving as cost-free gatekeepers, flagging those who should proceed to more advanced cytokine or genomic testing. Although routine reporting of NLR and SII may support low-cost surveillance, validation in larger, multicentre cohorts with serial sampling is needed before these indices can be integrated into clinical decision-making.

In this paper, we reported on four cases of severe pulmonary active tuberculosis in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoing interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) therapy. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS may increase the risk of developing active tuberculosis (TB) due to their impact on cellular immunity. Screening for latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (LTBI) should be performed, not only for the newer DMTs (alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab) but also for IFNβ-1b, alongside better supervision of these patients.

Background and objectives: Idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity characterized by a lateral curvature exceeding 10 degrees in the frontal plane accompanied by vertebral rotation in the transverse plane. Despite extensive research on genetic and neurological factors, its etiology is uncertain. This prospective observational study aims to investigate the relation between the primitive reflexes, specifically, the asymmetric tonic neck reflex (ATNR), symmetric tonic neck reflex (STNR), and spinal Galant reflex (SGR), which play key roles in early motor development and postural control and the severity of idiopathic scoliosis (measured via the Cobb angle and the Nash–Moe rotational quota. Additionally, the study evaluated whether the retention of primitive reflexes correlates with increased progression risk over 12 months of conservative treatment. Materials and Methods: Our study cohort included 162 patients, aged 7–19 years, diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis, who underwent clinical examination and assessment of retained primitive reflexes using standardized grading systems. Results: A total of 162 patients (95 girls, 67 boys; mean age: 12.73 ± 2.74 years) met the inclusion criteria. In 73.5% of the cases, scoliosis was detected, with the majority occurring in the dorsal region (40.1%). The mean initial Cobb angle was 13.49° ± 7.14°, with no significant change after 12 months of conservative treatment (p = 0.584). Nash–Moe rotation scores were 1 in 52.5% and 2 in 22% of the cases. Retention of the following primitive reflexes were identified at baseline: Moro (19.1%), ATNR (38.3%), STNR (44.4%), and GSR (27.8%). GSR retention significantly correlated with the Cobb angle (p = 0.011; R = 0.233). All the reflex scores decreased significantly after 12 months, but no correlation existed between the retained reflexes and scoliosis progression. Patients with a history of quadrupedal locomotion had significantly lower ATNR (p = 0.002), STNR (p < 0.001), and GSR (p = 0.017) retention. Conclusions: These findings suggest that primitive reflex testing could serve as an early screening tool in scoliosis risk stratification, being a cost-effective, non-invasive instrument for identifying at-risk children before clinically significant deformity develops.