Introduction: The recently developed femoral neck system (FNS) for treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNF), comprises theoretical biomechanical advantages compared to other implants. The aim of this study was to validate the safety and to report outcomes of patients treated with the FNS. Method: A retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated by FNS with a minimum of three months of follow-up. Details analysed from three medical centres were operative duration, estimated blood loss, initial hospitalisation duration, fixation quality as well as complications and reoperation rate. Patients who had revision surgery were compared to all other patients to identify risk factors for failure. In addition, a literature review was performed to analyse data on FNS clinical implementation and patient’s outcomes. The two data sets were combined and analysed. Results: One-hundred and two patients were included in this study cohort with an average follow-up of seven months (range 3–27). Ten papers were included in the literature review, reporting data on 278 patients. Overall, 380 patients were analysed. Average age was 62.6 years, 52% of the fractures were classified as Gardens 1–2. Overall, the revision rate was 9.2% (14 patients diagnosed with cut-out of implant, 10 with AVN, 8 with non-union and 8 with hardware removal). For the 102 patients in the cohort risk factors for reoperation included patients age, surgeon seniority and inadequate placement of the implant. Conclusion: This study shows that FNS is a safe treatment option for FNF. Intra-operative parameters and failure rates are comparable to previously reported rates for this implant and other frequently used implants.

Background: Patients with ankylotic spines suffering from vertebral column fractures are frequently operated on to maintain spinal stability and prevent secondary displacement and nerve damage. The aim of this study was to identify a subset of patients that may be treated non-operatively, thus avoiding operative complications in this group of patients. Methods: Extension-type injuries in patients with DISH (diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis) not involving the posterior elements of the spine comprised the study group. Results: Twenty two extension fractures occurred in 21 patients with DISH in SZMC (Shaare Zedek Medical Cente) between 2014–2025. All patients were treated non-operatively. Patients were allowed free mobilization, and no orthosis was used. The only limitation was keeping the bed inclined to 20–30 degrees to prevent extension at the fracture site. All fractures healed uneventfully, and no patient required late surgical intervention, and no neurological complications were noted. Conclusions: Patients with DISH who sustain extension-type injuries of the thoracolumbar spine, with no involvement of the posterior elements, may be treated non-operatively, with good results.