The increasing utilization of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus has raised interest regarding their impact on thyroid function. In fact, while these agents are well known for their efficacy in glycemic control and weight management, their association with thyroid disorders requires clarification due to the complex interplay between thyroid hormones and metabolic pathways. Thyroid dysfunction commonly co-occurs with metabolic conditions such as diabetes and obesity, suggesting a profound interconnection between these systems. This review aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the interaction between GLP-1 RAs and thyroid dysfunction and to clarify the safety of GLP-1 RAs in diabetic patients with thyroid disorders. By synthesizing existing evidence, this review highlights that, despite various studies exploring this topic, current evidence is inconclusive, with conflicting results. It is important to note that these drugs are relatively recent, and longer-term studies with larger sample sizes are likely needed to draw clearer conclusions. Currently, no existing guidelines provide definitive directions on this clinical issue; however, it is advisable to include thyroid function tests in the routine screening of diabetic patients, particularly those treated with GLP-1 Ras, with the goal of optimizing patient care and management.

The right heart–pulmonary circulation unit (RH-PCU) constitutes an integrated anatomo-functional system characterized by high-volume blood flow, low intravascular pressure, and minimal pulmonary vascular resistance. The RH-PCU dysfunction is a challenge for clinicians, as it can result from numerous pathological conditions, each with different clinical presentations. The pathophysiological changes underlying the hemodynamic alterations in the pressure and volume affecting the right ventricle can lead the patient to present with the primary symptom: dyspnea. We review the clinical presentation, the laboratory test, and the role of multimodality imaging in the evaluation of the disfunction of the RHPCU, including echocardiography, stress echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear imaging, and invasive pressure measurement through catheterization. We therefore aimed to describe the various diagnostic options available to clinicians, evaluating their effectiveness and limitations of use.

Background: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors, particularly ibrutinib, have improved outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia but are associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. The early identification of patients with increased susceptibility to atrial fibrillation remains a major challenge in cardio-oncology. Methods: This prospective pilot study included 45 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with ibrutinib. All patients underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography at baseline and after 6 months. Left atrial structure and function were assessed, with particular emphasis on speckle-tracking-derived left atrial strain parameters, including peak atrial longitudinal strain and peak atrial contraction strain. Results: At follow-up, a modest but significant increase in indexed left atrial volume was observed, while left atrial functional parameters remained stable. Patients who developed atrial fibrillation showed significantly lower baseline Peak Atrial Contraction Strain values compared with those who remained in sinus rhythm, whereas no significant differences in Peak Atrial Longitudinal Strain were detected. Conclusions: Ibrutinib-related atrial fibrillation appears to be driven primarily by pre-existing atrial vulnerability rather than early drug-induced atrial dysfunction. The baseline impairment of left atrial contractile function may represent a candidate echocardiographic marker of atrial functional vulnerability and may inform cardiovascular surveillance and monitoring strategies in patients treated with ibrutinib.

Cardiometabolic diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, despite major advances in pharmacological and lifestyle interventions. Exercise training is a cornerstone of prevention and treatment; however, adherence to traditional aerobic programs remains suboptimal. Isometric handgrip (IHG) training has emerged as a simple, time-efficient, and potentially effective strategy for improving cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes. This state-of-the-art review synthesizes current evidence on the physiological mechanisms underlying IHG training, including autonomic modulation, vascular function improvement, endothelial adaptation, and metabolic regulation. We summarize clinical data regarding its effects on blood pressure, arterial stiffness, endothelial function, insulin sensitivity, and inflammatory markers. Special attention is given to its applicability in specific populations, including hypertensive patients, individuals with metabolic syndrome, heart failure patients, and cancer survivors. We also discuss methodological heterogeneity across studies, safety considerations, and knowledge gaps. Finally, we outline future research directions needed to define optimal protocols and clarify long-term cardiometabolic benefits. IHG training represents a promising adjunctive strategy within cardiometabolic prevention and rehabilitation programs.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GIP/GLP-1) receptor agonists have substantially improved the management of obesity and cardiometabolic disease, providing significant benefits on weight reduction, glycemic control, and cardiovascular outcomes. Despite these advances, gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events remain a major cause of dose reduction, treatment interruption, and poor long-term adherence. Increasing evidence suggests that interactions between incretin-based therapies and the intestinal microenvironment may contribute to GI tolerability and influence treatment persistence. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature examining the relationship between incretin-based therapies, gut microbiota, intestinal barrier function, and microbial metabolites. Evidence from randomized clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and mechanistic investigations was evaluated to explore potential gut-directed supportive strategies during incretin-based treatment. Results: Preclinical and mechanistic evidence suggests possible bidirectional interactions between incretin pharmacology and the intestinal microenvironment, whereas direct human evidence remains limited and inconsistent. Alterations in gastrointestinal motility induced by GLP-1 receptor agonists could theoretically influence microbial composition and fermentation dynamics, although human studies have not consistently demonstrated significant microbiota changes. Based on these observations, we propose the Incretin–Microbiota Tolerance Axis (IMTA) as a conceptual framework linking gut homeostasis, GI tolerability, and treatment adherence. Among potential supportive interventions, partially hydrolyzed guar gum (PHGG) may promote SCFA-producing microbiota and improve bowel function, whereas simethicone may provide symptomatic relief of gas-related discomfort during dose escalation. SCFA-supportive nutritional approaches may further contribute to maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. Conclusions: Optimization of the intestinal microenvironment may represent a complementary strategy to improve GI tolerability and support long-term adherence during incretin-based therapy. Although the IMTA framework is supported by biological plausibility and emerging evidence, prospective clinical studies are required to determine whether microbiota-targeted interventions improve treatment persistence and cardiometabolic outcomes in patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists or dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is highly prevalent worldwide and represents the hepatic manifestation of a systemic cardiometabolic-inflammatory syndrome rather than an isolated organ disease. In parallel, anticancer therapies carry a well-recognised burden of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT). Evidence suggests that the metabolic-inflammatory cascade driving steatosis → steatohepatitis → fibrosis may also contribute to endothelial dysfunction, myocardial remodelling and cardiomyocyte vulnerability to chemotherapy-induced oxidative stress. This narrative review proposes a unifying conceptual framework in which MASLD may act as a potential amplifier of cardiotoxicity in oncology patients and examines whether lifestyle and dietary interventions could mitigate this cumulative risk. Methods: A structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was performed, prioritising systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, large cohort studies and recent international guidelines on MASLD, cardio-oncology and nutritional interventions. Results: Four converging molecular axes were identified as plausible links between MASLD and cardiomyocyte susceptibility to anticancer therapy: mitochondrial dysfunction with reactive oxygen species overproduction, NLRP3 inflammasome activation and metaflammation, endothelial nitric oxide impairment, and pro-fibrotic TGF-β/hepatic stellate cell signalling. Mediterranean-style dietary patterns, selected micronutrients and emerging metabolic therapies modulate the same network and may offer translational opportunities. Conclusions: Reframing MASLD as a potentially modifiable amplifier of CTR-CVT supports the integration of hepatic phenotyping into baseline cardio-oncology risk stratification and the use of personalised nutrition as a precision tool acting on shared mitochondrial, inflammatory, endothelial and fibrotic pathways. Multidisciplinary framework and prospective interventional studies, adopting composite hepato-cardio-oncological endpoints, are warranted.