Gabriel M. Fonseca

Prof. Dr. Gabriel M. Fonseca

University of La Frontera, Temuco, Araucanía, Chile
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 July 2020 in International journal of legal medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAna Molina
Ana Molina
MBManuel Bravo
Manuel Bravo
GFGabriel M. Fonseca
Gabriel M. Fonseca
NMNicholas Marquez-Grant
Nicholas Marquez-Grant
SMStella Martin-de-las-Heras
Stella Martin-de-las-Heras

1 July 2019 in Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGabriel M. Fonseca
Gabriel M. Fonseca
JOJorge Ortíz-Contreras
Jorge Ortíz-Contreras
CRCarlos Ramírez-Lagos
Carlos Ramírez-Lagos
SLSandra López-Lázaro
Sandra López-Lázaro

4 July 2022 in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PEPaula Valentina Espinoza-Silva
Paula Valentina Espinoza-Silva
SLSandra López-Lázaro
Sandra López-Lázaro
GFGabriel M. Fonseca
Gabriel M. Fonseca

1 May 2018 in Journal of Veterinary Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEsther Mora
Esther Mora
GFGabriel M. Fonseca
Gabriel M. Fonseca
PNPablo Navarro
Pablo Navarro
ACAntonio Castaño
Antonio Castaño
JLJoaquin Lucena
Joaquin Lucena

18 October 2013 in International Journal of Oral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGabriel M. Fonseca
Gabriel M. Fonseca
RFRicardo M Fonseca
Ricardo M Fonseca
MCMario Cantín
Mario Cantín
The fibrous epulis, a common tumor-like lesion of the gingiva, appears in the interdental papilla as a result of local irritation. Lesions are asymptomatic and have a variable growth rate. A 75-year-old woman was referred for the evaluation of a large painless gingival mass. It had started 10 years back and has been increasing in size the last year. No bone involvement was noted. The tumor was totally removed by excision with surgical scalpel under local anesthesia without teeth extraction. The microscopic findings were suggestive of a fibrous epulis. Differential diagnosis, clinical considerations and factors to prevent recurrence are discussed.

1 October 2015 in Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGabriel M. Fonseca
Gabriel M. Fonseca
EMEsther Mora
Esther Mora
JLJoaquín Lucena
Joaquín Lucena
MCMario Cantín
Mario Cantín
The interaction between domestic animals and humans has not been free of conflicts, and dog attacks represent a real problem, not only for the health consequences, but also for the possible criminal, and can affect the legal or financial outcomes. Dogs’ teeth have particular features, and the resulting bite marks are a major point of forensic interest mainly in the absence of witnesses or in cases where postmortem dog interference can be misinterpreted. An appropriate forensic approach should include an exhaustive analysis of the scene, the victim, and the dog. Bite marks must be discriminated from other traumas, and the familiarity of the investigator with different patterns of animal behavior can be of great importance in the correct assessment of the offending specie. A scientific inclusion/exclusion of the dog involved is possible and also recommended because of the possible consequences for the owner of the animal. Since dog bite mark analysis should involve different forensic professionals such as pathologists, odontologists, veterinarians, biologists, and also police investigators, a review focused on this type of evidence from a multidisciplinary point of view is presented. Prevention and mitigating strategies focused on both breed-specific legislation and the legal responsibility of the owner for the dog's behavior are discussed.