James A. Middleton

Dr. James A. Middleton

Arizona State University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 April 2008 in Educational Studies in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRichard Lesh
Richard Lesh
JMJames A. Middleton
James A. Middleton
ECElizabeth Caylor
Elizabeth Caylor
SGShweta Gupta
Shweta Gupta

10 November 2022 in ZDM – Mathematics Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJames A. Middleton
James A. Middleton
AWAdi Wiezel
Adi Wiezel
AJAmanda Jansen
Amanda Jansen
ESEthan P. Smith
Ethan P. Smith
We examined the relationships between different aspects of mathematics engagement for 285 students in their first year of high school in the United States. Path Analyses were used to trace the relationships between students’ self-reported prior motivation and appraisals of control and value of mathematics, perceptions of teacher support and peer support. These variables and observed teacher and peer support as coded from video by researchers, were examined as potentially impacting students’ self-reported in-the moment affect and task-level control and value appraisals Our results showed three key contributions. First, significant paths corresponded to relationships predicted by Control Value Theory (CVT) across a particularly robust set of variables and over the course of their first semester in high school. Second, results added further nuance by considering the objects that students’ in-the-moment emotions were directed toward, showing distinctions between positive and negative emotions directed at the mathematics task, students’ teachers and peers, and selves. Third, results more closely considered the impact of both observed and perceived aspect of support from peers and teachers in the classroom, in both its academic and social forms. Implications are discussed for theory and practice.

17 November 2020 in Educational Studies in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLorna Headrick
Lorna Headrick
AWAdi Wiezel
Adi Wiezel
GTGabriel Tarr
Gabriel Tarr
XZXiaoxue Zhang
Xiaoxue Zhang
CCCatherine E. Cullicott
Catherine E. Cullicott
AJAmanda Jansen
Amanda Jansen


28 February 2009 in Educational Technology Research and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TKTerri L. Kurz
Terri L. Kurz
IKIvana Batarelo Kokić
Ivana Batarelo Kokić
JMJames A. Middleton
James A. Middleton

4 February 2022 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJames A. Middleton
James A. Middleton
SKStephen Krause
Stephen Krause
EJEugene Judson
Eugene Judson
LRLydia Ross
Lydia Ross
RCRobert Culbertson
Robert Culbertson
YCYing-Chih Chen
Ying-Chih Chen
Connections among faculty who might be potential resources for diffusion of learner-centered practices across STEM departments were examined at a major research university. Specifically, the research assessed the impact of these connections on learner-centered beliefs among faculty and the implementation of learner-centered practices across the network. Participants were recruited from Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics departments, and from departments in the College of Engineering. A snowball sampling procedure began with 21 randomly selected faculty from each department engaged in the STEM instruction of engineering students. These faculties then identified the colleagues they utilize as resources for improving their instruction. Characteristics of faculty connectedness in the network consisted of number of connections and depth of connections for both individual faculty and within and across departments. Outcome measures consisted of a survey of learner-centered attitudes and classroom observations of faculty instructional practices. The results show that faculty exhibiting more learner-centered behaviors had deeper and more extensive social networks than their peers who were more instructor-centered. The results are discussed in terms of the need for intra- and inter-departmental faculty professional development experiences that build and support collaborative organizations of faculty working together to transform early engineering experiences.