Background/Objectives: scoliosis is a three-dimensional structural deformity characterized by lateral and rotational curvature of the spine. The current gold-standard method to assess scoliosis is the measurement of lateral curvature of the spine using the Cobb angle in coronal plane radiographs. The interrater variability for Cobb angle measurements reaches up to 10°. The purpose of this study was to describe and assess the performance of a fully automated method for measuring Cobb angles using a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) model trained on over 17,000 images, and investigate its interrater/intrarater agreement with a reference standard. Methods: in total, 196 AP/PA full-spine radiographs were included in this study. A reference standard was established by four radiologists, defined as the median of their Cobb angle measurements. Independently, an AI-based software, IB Lab SQUIRREL (version 1.0), also performed Cobb angle measurements on the same radiographs. Results: after comparing the readers’ Cobb angle end vertebrae selection to the AI’s outputs, 194 curvatures were considered valid for performance assessment, displaying an accuracy of 88.58% in end vertebrae selection. The AI’s performance showed very low absolute bias, with a mean difference and standard deviation of differences from the reference standard of 0.16° ± 0.35° in the Cobb angle measurements. The ICC comparing the reference standard and the AI’s measurements was 0.97. Conclusions: the AI model demonstrated good results in the determination of end vertebrae and excellent results in automated Cobb angle measurements compared to radiologists and could serve as a reliable tool in clinical practice and research.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel in cases of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where conventional microbiology is unclear, and to assess its role as a complementary intraoperative diagnostic tool.Methods: Five groups representing common microbiological scenarios in hip and knee revision arthroplasty were selected from our arthroplasty registry, prospectively maintained PJI databases, and biobank: 1) unexpected-negative cultures (UNCs), 2) unexpected-positive cultures (UPCs), 3) single-positive intraoperative cultures (SPCs), and 4) clearly septic and 5) aseptic cases. In total, 268 archived synovial fluid samples from 195 patients who underwent acute/chronic revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Cases were classified according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 criteria. JI panel evaluation of synovial fluid was performed, and the results were compared with cultures.Results: The JI panel detected microorganisms in 7/48 (14.5%) and 15/67 (22.4%) cases related to UNCs and SPCs, respectively, but not in cases of UPCs. The correlation between JI panel detection and infection classification criteria for early/late acute and chronic PJI was 46.6%, 73%, and 40%, respectively. Overall, the JI panel identified 12.6% additional microorganisms and three new species. The JI panel pathogen identification showed a sensitivity and specificity of 41.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 33.7 to 49.5) and 91.1% (95% CI 84.7 to 94.9), respectively. In total, 19/195 (9.7%) could have been managed differently and more accurately upon JI panel evaluation.Conclusion: Despite its microbial limitation, JI panel demonstrated clinical usefulness by complementing the traditional methods based on multiple cultures, particularly in PJI with unclear microbiological results.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(7):353–361.

Purpose: Despite advances of three-dimensional imaging pelvic radiographs remain the cornerstone in the evaluation of the hip joint. However, large inter- and intra-rater variabilities were reported due to subjective landmark setting. Artificial intelligence (AI)–powered software applications could improve the reproducibility of pelvic radiograph evaluation by providing standardized measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement of a newly developed AI algorithm for the evaluation of pelvic radiographs. Methods: Three-hundred pelvic radiographs from 280 patients with different degrees of acetabular coverage and osteoarthritis (Tönnis Grade 0 to 3) were evaluated. Reliability and agreement between manual measurements and the outputs of the AI software were assessed for the lateral-center-edge (LCE) angle, neck-shaft angle, sharp angle, acetabular index, as well as the femoral head extrusion index. Results: The AI software provided reliable results in 94.3% (283/300). The ICC values ranged between 0.73 for the Acetabular Index to 0.80 for the LCE Angle. Agreement between readers and AI outputs, given by the standard error of measurement (SEM), was good for hips with normal coverage (LCE-SEM: 3.4°) and no osteoarthritis (LCE-SEM: 3.3°) and worse for hips with undercoverage (LCE-SEM: 5.2°) or severe osteoarthritis (LCE-SEM: 5.1°). Conclusion: AI-powered applications are a reliable alternative to manual evaluation of pelvic radiographs. While being accurate for patients with normal acetabular coverage and mild signs of osteoarthritis, it needs improvement in the evaluation of patients with hip dysplasia and severe osteoarthritis.

Artificial-intelligence (AI) allows large-scale analyses of long-leg-radiographs (LLRs). We used this technology to derive an update for the classical regression formulae by Trotter and Gleser, which are frequently used to infer stature based on long-bone measurements. We analyzed calibrated, standing LLRs from 4200 participants taken between 2015 and 2020. Automated landmark placement was conducted using the AI-algorithm LAMA™ and the measurements were used to determine femoral, tibial and total leg-length. Linear regression equations were subsequently derived for stature estimation. The estimated regression equations have a shallower slope and larger intercept in males and females (Femur-male: slope = 2.08, intercept = 77.49; Femur-female: slope = 1.9, intercept = 79.81) compared to the formulae previously derived by Trotter and Gleser 1952 (Femur-male: slope = 2.38, intercept = 61.41; Femur-female: slope = 2.47, intercept = 54.13) and Trotter and Gleser 1958 (Femur-male: slope = 2.32, intercept = 65.53). All long-bone measurements showed a high correlation (r ≥ 0.76) with stature. The linear equations we derived tended to overestimate stature in short persons and underestimate stature in tall persons. The differences in slopes and intercepts from those published by Trotter and Gleser (1952, 1958) may result from an ongoing secular increase in stature. Our study illustrates that AI-algorithms are a promising new tool enabling large-scale measurements.