Jeong SY, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Oct;32(10):1717-1720. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1717

Background: Existing data on the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during late pregnancy is well established, providing assurance. However, the use of NSAIDs during early pregnancy remains inconclusive owing to conflicting findings on adverse neonatal outcomes as well as the limited data on adverse maternal outcomes. Therefore, we sought to investigate whether early prenatal exposure to NSAIDs was associated with neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes. Methods and findings: We conducted a nationwide, population-based cohort study using Korea’s National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database with a mother–offspring cohort constructed and validated by the NHIS to include all live births in women aged 18 to 44 years between 2010 and 2018. We defined exposure to NSAIDs as at least two records of NSAID prescriptions during early pregnancy (first 90 days of pregnancy for congenital malformations and first 19 weeks for nonmalformation outcomes) and compared against three distinct referent groups of (1) unexposed, no NSAID prescription during the 3 months before pregnancy start to end of early pregnancy; (2) acetaminophen-exposed, at least two acetaminophen prescriptions during early pregnancy (i.e., active comparator); and (3) past users, at least two NSAID prescriptions before the start of pregnancy but no relevant prescriptions during pregnancy. Outcomes of interest were adverse birth outcomes of major congenital malformations and low birth weight and adverse maternal outcomes of antepartum hemorrhage and oligohydramnios. We estimated relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs using generalized linear models within a propensity score (PS) fine stratification weighted cohort that accounted for various potential confounders of maternal sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, co-medication use, and general markers of burden of illness. Of 1.8 million pregnancies in the PS weighted analyses, exposure to NSAIDs during early pregnancy was associated with slightly increased risks for neonatal outcomes of major congenital malformations (PS-adjusted RR, 1.14 [CI, 1.10 to 1.18]) and low birth weight (1.29 [1.25 to 1.33]), and for maternal outcome of oligohydramnios (1.09 [1.01 to 1.19]) but not antepartum hemorrhage (1.05 [0.99 to 1.12]). The risks of overall congenital malformations, low birth weight, and oligohydramnios remained significantly elevated despite comparing NSAIDs against acetaminophen or past users. Risks of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes were higher with cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors or use of NSAIDs for more than 10 days, whereas generally similar effects were observed across the three most frequently used individual NSAIDs. Point estimates were largely consistent across all sensitivity analyses, including the sibling-matched analysis. Main limitations of this study are residual confounding by indication and from unmeasured factors. Conclusions: This large-scale, nationwide cohort study found that exposure to NSAIDs during early pregnancy was associated with slightly higher risks of neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes. Clinicians should therefore carefully weigh the benefits of prescribing NSAIDs in early pregnancy against its modest, but possible, risk of neonatal and maternal outcomes, where if possible, consider prescribing nonselective NSAIDs for <10 days, along with continued careful monitoring for any safety signals.

Purpose of review: The current criteria for the diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection (IAI) were derived from a study of women at term in labor, but is currently used as the main diagnostic tool for clinical chorioamnionitis. Regarding the inconsistent usage of the term, the clinical utility of clinical chorioamnionitis needs to be revisited. In this review, we addressed the critical issues on why the diagnostic criteria of suspected clinical chorioamnionitis should be changed. Recent findings: Overall, the accuracy of clinical chorioamnionitis to detect intra-amniotic infection (IAI) is not high, around 50%. The accuracy of each diagnostic criteria to diagnose IAI is for example, 51.1% with maternal tachycardia, 57.8% with fetal tachycardia and 55.6% with maternal leukocytosis. However, it needs to be reminded that these diagnostic performance had been obtained from term pregnancies but not from preterm pregnancies. Since there is a difference between clinical chorioamnionitis and histologic chorioamnionitis or even IAI, the diagnostic criteria of clinical chorioamnionitis would be better if it could directly predict the development of neonatal infectious outcomes. In fact, multiple definitions of clinical chorioamnionitis either in more lenient or stringent manner are currently used, which is responsible for inconsistent association of clinical chorioamnionitis with long term neonatal outcomes. Whereas the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm is followed by expeditious delivery, the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis at term pregnancy is usually conducted in laboring women and requires additional neonatal evaluation for sepsis, which suggests different implications of clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm and term pregnancy. Current diagnostic criteria of clinical chorioamnionitis should be revised, specifically in terms of sensitivity in preterm pregnancy and specificity in term pregnancy.

Previous studies demonstrated an association between cervical strain and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD). The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of elastography in predicting sPTD at <32 weeks of gestation in women with singleton pregnancies receiving progesterone for short cervix (≤2.5 cm) diagnosed between 16 and 28 weeks of gestation Among 115 participants eligible for analysis, nine had sPTD at <32 weeks. Preprogesterone (PP0) mean internal os strain (IOS), elasticity contrast index (ECI), hardness ratio (HR), one-week postprogesterone (PP1) IOS, mean external os strain (EOS), ECI, and HR were significantly different between groups. Higher PP0 IOS, PP1 IOS, and PP1 EOS were associated with a 2.92, 4.39 and 3.65-fold increase in the risk of sPTD at <32 weeks, respectively (adjusted for cervical length (CL) at diagnosis; p = 0.04, 0.012 and 0.026, respectively). A combination of CL at diagnosis, PP0 IOS and PP1 EOS showed a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.858) than that of CL alone (p = 0.041). In women with singleton pregnancies receiving progesterone for short cervix, cervical elastography performed before and one week after progesterone treatment may be useful in predicting sPTD at <32 weeks of gestation.

Seo N, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Aug;38(33):e268. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e268

The aim of the study was to investigate if there are changes in elastographic parameters in the cervix at term around the time of delivery and if there are differences in the parameters between women with spontaneous labor and those without labor (labor induction). Nulliparous women at 36 weeks of gestation eligible for vaginal delivery were enrolled. Cervical elastography was performed and cervical length were measured using the E-Cervix^TM system (WS80A Ultrasound System, Samsung Medison, Seoul, Korea) at each weekly antenatal visit until admission for spontaneous labor or labor induction. E-Cervix parameters of interest included elasticity contrast index (ECI), internal os strain mean level (IOS), external os strain mean level (EOS), IOS/EOS strain mean ratio, strain mean level, and hardness ratio. Regression analysis was performed using days from elastographic measurement at each visit to admission for delivery and the presence or absence of labor against cervical length, and each E-Cervix parameter fitted to a linear model for longitudinal data measured repeatedly. A total of 96 women were included in the analysis, (spontaneous labor, n = 39; labor induction, n = 57). Baseline characteristics were not different between the two groups except for cesarean delivery rate. Cervical length decreased with advancing gestation and was different between the two groups. Most elastographic parameters including ECI, IOS, EOS, strain mean, and hardness ratio were significantly different between the two groups. In addition, ECI, IOS, and strain mean values significantly increased with advancing gestation. Our longitudinal study using ultrasound elastography indicated that E-cervix parameters tended to change linearly at term near the time of admission for delivery and that there were differences in E-Cervix parameters according to the presence or absence of labor.