Great strides have been made in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) research over the past half-century. However, this progress has created both opportunities and challenges. From a geographic perspective, certain challenges remain, including the modelling of geographic-featured environments with GIS data model, the enhancement of GIS’s analysis functions for comprehensive geographic analysis and achieving human-oriented geographic information presentation. Several basic theoretical and technical ideas that follow the workflow and processes of geographic information induction, geographic scenario modelling, geographic process analysis and geographic environment representation are proposed to fill the gaps between GIS and geography. We also call for designing methods for big geographic data-oriented analysis, making best use of videos and developing virtual geographic scenario-based GIS for further evolution.

The increasing availability of high resolution imagery has triggered the need for automated image analysis techniques, with reduced human intervention and reproducible analysis procedures. The knowledge gained in the past might be of use to achieving this goal, if systematically organized into libraries which would guide the image analysis procedure. In this study we aimed at evaluating the variability of digital classifications carried out by three experts who were all assigned the same interpretation task. Besides the three classifications performed by independent operators, we developed an additional rule-based classification that relied on the image classifications best practices found in the literature, and used it as a surrogate for libraries of object characteristics. The results showed statistically significant differences among all operators who classified the same reference imagery. The classifications carried out by the experts achieved satisfactory results when transferred to another area for extracting the same classes of interest, without modification of the developed rules.

Object-based image analysis (OBIA) has become very popular since the turn of the century. For high-resolution situations, in particular, where the objects of interest are larger than pixels, methods have been developed that build on image segmentation and on the further classification of objects rather than on pixels. Many studies have shown that OBIA methods are, in principle, more transferable and reapplicable to other images. To obtain comparable results by reapplying a given rule set on (slightly) changed conditions, the rule set must either be able to adapt to the changed conditions or it must be parameterized for manual adaptation. In this context, a rule set can be seen as the more robust the less it has to be changed, and vice versa. In this article we introduce a new method to evaluate the robustness of a rule set. The main assumption is that the amount of necessary adaptations can be measured in conjunction with the quality of classification achieved. We demonstrate that the method introduced is able to (1) evaluate the robustness of a rule set and (2) identify crucial elements of a rule set that need to be reparameterized.