Julian Lassiter Gendreau

Dr. Julian Lassiter Gendreau

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2019 in Robotic Surgery: Research and Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMarissa D'Souza
Marissa D'Souza
Julian Lassiter GendreauJulian Lassiter Gendreau
Julian Lassiter Gendreau
AFAustin Feng
Austin Feng
LKLily H Kim
Lily H Kim
AHAllen Ho
Allen Ho
AVAnand Veeravagu
Anand Veeravagu
Robot-assisted spine surgery has recently emerged as a viable tool to enable less invasive and higher precision surgery. The first-ever spine robot, the SpineAssist (Mazor Robotics Ltd., Caesarea, Israel), gained FDA approval in 2004. With its ability to provide real-time intraoperative navigation and rigid stereotaxy, robotic-assisted surgery has the potential to increase accuracy while decreasing radiation exposure, complication rates, operative time, and recovery time. Currently, robotic assistance is mainly restricted to spinal fusion and instrumentation procedures, but recent studies have demonstrated its use in increasingly complex procedures such as spinal tumor resections and ablations, vertebroplasties, and deformity correction. However, robots do require high initial costs and training, and thus, require justification for their incorporation into common practice. In this review, we discuss the history of spinal robots along as well as currently available systems. We then examine the literature to evaluate accuracy, operative time, complications, radiation exposure, and costs – comparing robotic-assisted to traditional fluoroscopy-assisted freehand approaches. Finally, we consider future applications for robots in spine surgery.

26 September 2019 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMarissa D'Souza
Marissa D'Souza
NMNicholas A. Macdonald
Nicholas A. Macdonald
Julian Lassiter GendreauJulian Lassiter Gendreau
Julian Lassiter Gendreau
PDPate J. Duddleston
Pate J. Duddleston
AFAustin Feng
Austin Feng
AHAllen Ho
Allen Ho
Spinal fusion is the most widely performed procedure in spine surgery. It is the preferred treatment for a wide variety of pathologies including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and deformity. Surgeons have the choice of fusing vertebrae by utilizing cages containing autografts, allografts, demineralized bone matrices (DBMs), or graft substitutes such as ceramic scaffolds. Autografts from the iliac spine are the most commonly used as they offer osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive capabilities, all while avoiding immune system rejection. Allografts obtained from cadavers and living donors can also be advantageous as they lack the need for graft extraction from the patient. DBMs are acid-extracted organic allografts with osteoinductive properties. Ceramic grafts containing hydroxyapatite can be readily manufactured and are able to provide osteoinductive support while having a long shelf life. Further, bone-morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), synthetic peptides, and autologous growth factors are currently being optimized to assist in improving vertebral fusion. Genetic therapies utilizing viral transduction are also currently being devised. This review provides an overview of the advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of currently available graft materials. The current literature on growth factors, stem cells, and genetic therapy is also discussed.

13 June 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAustin-John Fowler Fordham
Austin-John Fowler Fordham
CHCaitlin-Craft Hacherl
Caitlin-Craft Hacherl
NPNeal Patel
Neal Patel
KJKeri Jones
Keri Jones
BMBrandon Myers
Brandon Myers
Julian Lassiter GendreauJulian Lassiter Gendreau
Julian Lassiter Gendreau
Differentiating between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases proves to be a challenging diagnosis for neuroradiologists, as both present with imaging patterns consisting of peritumoral hyperintensities with similar intratumoral texture on traditional magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Early diagnosis is paramount, as each pathology has completely different methods of clinical assessment. In the past decade, recent developments in advanced imaging modalities enabled providers to acquire a more accurate diagnosis earlier in the patient’s clinical assessment, thus optimizing clinical outcome. Dynamic susceptibility contrast has been optimized for detecting relative cerebral blood flow and relative cerebral blood volume. Diffusion tensor imaging can be used to detect changes in mean diffusivity. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging is an innovative modality detecting changes in intracellular volume fraction, isotropic volume fraction, and extracellular volume fraction. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is able to assist by providing a metabolic descriptor while detecting variable ratios of choline/N-acetylaspartate, choline/creatine, and N-acetylaspartate/creatine. Finally, radiomics and machine learning algorithms have been devised to assist in improving diagnostic accuracy while often utilizing more than one advanced imaging protocol per patient. In this review, we provide an update on all the current evidence regarding the identification and differentiation of glioblastomas from solitary brain metastases.

18 June 2022 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRohin Singh
Rohin Singh
MMM. Lane Moore
M. Lane Moore
HHHana Hallak
Hana Hallak
NSNathan A. Shlobin
Nathan A. Shlobin
NBNolan J Brown
Nolan J Brown
NPNaresh P. Patel
Naresh P. Patel

12 April 2023 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NPNoah Pierzchajlo
Noah Pierzchajlo
TSTaylor C. Stevenson
Taylor C. Stevenson
HHHuey Huynh
Huey Huynh
JNJimmy Nguyen
Jimmy Nguyen
SBSamuel Boatright
Samuel Boatright
SCSelby G. Chen
Selby G. Chen
Spine surgery has undergone significant changes in approach and technique. With the adoption of intraoperative navigation, minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) has arguably become the gold standard. Augmented reality (AR) has now emerged as a front-runner in anatomical visualization and narrower operative corridors. In effect, AR is poised to revolutionize surgical training and operative outcomes. Our study examines the current literature on AR-assisted MISS, synthesizes findings, and creates a narrative highlighting the history and future of AR in spine surgery. Relevant literature was gathered using the PubMed (Medline) database from 1975 to 2023. Pedicle screw placement models were the primary intervention in AR. These were compared to the outcomes of traditional MISS. We found that AR devices on the market show promising clinical outcomes in preoperative training and intraoperative use. Three prominent systems were: XVision, HoloLens, and ImmersiveTouch. In the studies, surgeons, residents, and medical students had opportunities to operate AR systems, showcasing their educational potential across each phase of learning. Specifically, one facet described training with cadaver models to gauge accuracy in pedicle screw placement. AR-MISS exceeded free-hand methods without unique complications or contraindications. While still in its infancy, AR has already proven beneficial for educational training and intraoperative MISS applications. We believe that with continued research and advancement of this technology, AR is poised to become a dominant player within the fundamentals of surgical education and MISS operative technique.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNicholas Major
Nicholas Major
NPNeal A. Patel
Neal A. Patel
JBJosiah Bennett
Josiah Bennett
ENEna Novakovic
Ena Novakovic
DPDana Poloni
Dana Poloni
JLJoshua Loya
Joshua Loya
Tumors of the central nervous system are the most common solid malignancies diagnosed in children. While common, they are also found to have some of the lowest survival rates of all malignancies. Treatment of childhood brain tumors often consists of operative gross total resection with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The current body of literature is largely inconclusive regarding the overall benefit of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. However, it is known that both are associated with conditions that lower the quality of life in children who undergo those treatments. Chemotherapy is often associated with nausea, emesis, significant fatigue, immunosuppression, and alopecia. While radiotherapy can be effective for achieving local control, it is associated with late effects such as endocrine dysfunction, secondary malignancy, and neurocognitive decline. Advancements in radiotherapy grant both an increase in lifetime survival and an increased lifetime for survivors to contend with these late effects. In this review, the authors examined all the published literature, analyzing the results of clinical trials, case series, and technical notes on patients undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of tumors of the central nervous system with a focus on neurocognitive decline and survival outcomes.