We evaluated the influence of CSN1S1 and LALBA polymorphisms on cow’s milk yield and quality. The analysis was done on Czech Simmental and Holstein cows. Non-genetic factors were included as well. CSN1S1 did not influence the milk performance in the first lactation. In the second lactation, cows with the BB genotype had significantly higher milk, protein, and fat yields than BC. The differences between LALBA genotypes were non-significant in the first lactation, while in the second lactation, the fat percentage was significantly higher in BB than in AB. The farm significantly influenced milk, protein, and fat yields in both the first and second lactations and fat percentage in the first lactation. The effect of CSN1S1 and LALBA genotypes on the milk technological quality was non-significant. Breed did not influence any of the evaluated technological traits and SCS. The ethanol test was not influenced by farm, season, lactation phase, protein percentage, breed, or non-fat solids percentage. Farm, season, and protein percentage significantly influenced milk fermentation ability, renneting, and SCS. The lactose content is a good indicator of udder health.

This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting the fatty acid (FA) profile in cow’s milk. The effects of a farm, lactation parity and stage, breed and polymorphisms in the AGPAT6, DGAT1, LEP, FASN and SCD1 genes were evaluated. A total of 196 Holstein cows, 226 Simmental cows and seven crosses were sampled 751 times. The cows were kept at five farms and were in the first up to the sixth lactation, and 49 individual FAs and 11 groups were analyzed. The farm significantly affected the proportion of all FAs except for C16:1n-7c and isoC14:0. Additionally, the lactation stage was significant for most FAs, and the opposite was true for lactation parity. The effect of the breed was negligible. For the gene polymorphisms, the SCD1 TT genotype exceeded the CC in C10:0, C12:0, C14:0, C16:1n-7c and C18:2, and the opposite was true for C10:1, C12:1, C14:1n-5c, isoC17:0, C16:1 and C18:1, i.e., the TT genotype was higher for saturated FAs, and the CT genotype was higher for monounsaturated FAs. The results hint at the intermediary heredity of the SCD1 gene. The FASN gene was strongly associated with four FAs and branched-chain FAs, and genotype AG was better than GG. LEP was significant for five individual FAs and branched-chain FAs. The differences in FA composition among genotypes were rather small, which could lead to overestimation of the effect and needs to be considered in the next research.

In three consecutive experiments, natural yogurt (NY) and fruit yogurt (FY) fortified with 5 and 10% skimmed milk powder (SMP) and 10% jam from black currant (BC), elderberry (EB), and their mixture of 1:1 (BCEB) were analyzed, and consumer acceptance was assessed. In Experiment 1, the effect of SMP (0, 5, and 10%) on selected physicochemical parameters of the NY was evaluated. With the increasing addition of SMP, a decrease in fat content (up to −19%) and, conversely, an increase in protein content (up to +82%) and viscosity were noted. Analyses of fruits and jams intended for yogurt fortification revealed a significantly higher vitamin C content in BC than in EB and higher anthocyanins in EB than in BC. In Experiment 2, NY with 5 and 10% SMP was fortified with 10% jams (BC or EB). A joint effect of SMP and the type of fruit jam was evaluated. The same trends in fat and protein contents as in Experiment 1 were detected. The sensory evaluation showed better acceptance of FY with 10% SMP and no differences between BC and EB perception. Thus, for Experiment 3, FY was prepared with only 10% SMP and 10% jam (BC, EB, BCEB). Significant differences were detected in active acidity and color measured in the CIELab system. These results were also confirmed in sensory evaluation. The overall acceptability showed that FY with different types of jam did not significantly differ. The launching of innovative fortified yogurt onto the market represents a promising way to increase the diversity of fermented dairy products with nutritionally desirable properties.

The fatty acid (FA) composition of?milk fat can be?positively influenced by?the modification of?dairy farming and the possible selection of?raw material for processing. The question arises as to whether the benefits of a better FA composition ...