Mahamad Yousif

Dr. Mahamad Yousif


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

11 November 2025 in Waste and Biomass Valorization
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MYMahamad Yousif
Mahamad Yousif
ECEoin Cunningham
Eoin Cunningham
BSBeatrice Smyth
Beatrice Smyth
IBIfe Bolaji
Ife Bolaji
The poultry industry generates millions of tons of feathers every year, creating environmental challenges but also offering opportunities for keratin recovery. This study optimized two cost-effective keratin extraction methods, alkaline and sulfitolysis. Factorial design analysis was utilized to assess the effects of process parameters on the feather dissolution rate. For alkaline extraction, NaOH concentration, temperature, and time were varied. Optimal conditions (0.5 M NaOH, 80 °C, 30 min) achieved a dissolution rate of 99.67 ± 0.09% and a keratin yield of 53.62 ± 1.62%. In the sulfitolysis method, parameters including sulfite type and concentration, urea concentration, SDS concentration, temperature, and solid-to-liquid ratio were analyzed. The highest dissolution rates were obtained with 0.5 M Na₂SO₃, 8 M urea, 0.25 g SDS/g feathers at 100 °C for 6 h and 1:15 solid-to-liquid ratio, yielding 98.30 ± 0.30% dissolution and a keratin yield of 64.48 ± 7.72%. Characterization indicated molecular weights of 10–20 kDa, preservation of secondary protein structures, and thermal stability comparable to feathers. XRD showed greater crystallinity in alkaline keratin, while SEM confirmed complete feather dissolution. Both methods provide low-cost, effective alternatives to alternative methods. However, differences in yield and material properties suggest sulfitolysis keratin is more suitable for thermally processed biopolymers, while alkaline keratin is better for cosmetic and food applications. Graphical Abstract

1 January 2026 in Advances in Polymer Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MYMahamad Yousif
Mahamad Yousif
ECEoin Cunningham
Eoin Cunningham
BSBeatrice Smyth
Beatrice Smyth
IBIfe Bolaji
Ife Bolaji
Feather keratin represents a promising renewable feedstock for biopolymer films; however, its broader application has been limited by inadequate mechanical strength and barrier performance. In this study, the effects of sulfitolysis extraction conditions, crosslinker type and concentration, and processing method on the mechanical, barrier, and optical properties of keratin films were systematically investigated. Reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate concentration during extraction significantly enhanced film tensile strength, with improvements of up to 282%. Films plasticized with 20 wt% glycerol exhibited high flexibility, achieving elongation at break values exceeding 100% and reaching up to 133% when crosslinked with 1,4‐butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE). Crosslinking with 10% formaldehyde or 10% BDDE reduced film solubility by ~80% and produced the highest tensile strength (4.28 MPa) while maintaining high ductility (86% elongation at break). Optimized keratin films demonstrated excellent oxygen‐barrier performance, with oxygen permeability values of 13–16.6 × 10 −6 cc·mm·m −2 ·day −1 ·Pa −1 , comparable to polyethylene terephthalate and polyamide‐6. Water vapor permeability remained below 2 × 10 −3 g·mm·m −2 ·day −1 ·Pa −1 , outperforming most keratin‐based films reported in the literature. All films exhibited outstanding UV‐blocking capability, with less than 0.4% transmittance in the 200–300 nm range. Comparative analysis revealed that solution‐cast films displayed superior tensile properties and water resistance, whereas compression‐molded films offered improved visual transparency. Overall, this work demonstrates that targeted control of extraction chemistry, crosslinking strategy, and processing route enables substantial performance enhancements in keratin films, advancing their potential as biobased packaging materials; however, further work is required to ensure compliance with food‐contact safety regulations.