The role of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is well established in brain, where its absence leads to the fragile X syndrome (FXS). FMRP is almost ubiquitously expressed, suggesting that, in addition to its effects in brain, it may have fundamental roles in other organs. There is evidence that FMRP expression can be linked to cancer. FMR1 mRNA, encoding FMRP, is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. A decreased risk of cancer has been reported in patients with FXS while a patient‐case with FXS showed an unusual decrease of tumour brain invasiveness. However, a role for FMRP in regulating cancer biology, if any, remains unknown. We show here that FMRP and FMR1 mRNA levels correlate with prognostic indicators of aggressive breast cancer, lung metastases probability and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We establish that FMRP overexpression in murine breast primary tumours enhances lung metastasis while its reduction has the opposite effect regulating cell spreading and invasion. FMRP binds mRNAs involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and invasion including E‐cadherin and Vimentin mRNAs, hallmarks of EMT and cancer progression.

The KEAP1/Nrf2 pathway is a master regulator of several redox-sensitive genes implicated in resistance of tumor cells against chemotherapeutic drugs. Recent data suggest that epigenetic mechanisms ...

Purpose: In an effort to additionally determine the global patterns of CpG island hypermethylation in sporadic breast cancer, we searched for aberrant promoter methylation at 10 gene loci in 54 primary breast cancer and 10 breast benign lesions. Experimental Design: Genomic DNA sodium bisulfate converted from benign and malignant tissues was used as template in methyl-specific PCR for BRCA1, p16, ESR1, GSTP1, TRβ1, RARβ2, HIC1, APC, CCND2, and CDH1 genes. Results: The majority of the breast cancer (85%) showed aberrant methylation in at least 1 of the loci tested with half of them displaying 3 or more methylated genes. The highest frequency of aberrant promoter methylation was found for HIC1 (48%) followed by ESR1 (46%), and CDH1 (39%). Similar methylation frequencies were detected for breast benign lesions with the exception of the CDH1 gene (P = 0.02). The analysis of methylation distribution indicates a statistically significant association between methylation of the ESR1 promoter, and methylation at CDH1, TRβ1, GSTP1, and CCND2 loci (P < 0.03). Methylated status of the BRCA1 promoter was inversely correlated with methylation at the RARβ2 locus (P < 0.03). Conclusions: Our results suggest a nonrandom distribution for promoter hypermethylation in sporadic breast cancer, with tumor subsets characterized by aberrant methylation of specific cancer-related genes. These breast cancer subgroups may represent separate biological entities with potential differences in sensitivity to therapy, occurrence of metastasis, and overall prognosis.