Michele Russo

Prof. Michele Russo

Sapienza Univeristy of Rome, Department of History, Representation and Restoration of Architecture
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gabriele GuidiGabriele Guidi
Gabriele Guidi
Michele RussoMichele Russo
Michele Russo
DADavide Angheleddu
Davide Angheleddu

12 August 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simone TeruggiSimone Teruggi
Simone Teruggi
Eleonora GrilliEleonora Grilli
Eleonora Grilli
Michele RussoMichele Russo
Michele Russo
Francesco FassiFrancesco Fassi
Francesco Fassi
Fabio RemondinoFabio Remondino
Fabio Remondino
The recent years saw an extensive use of 3D point cloud data for heritage documentation, valorisation and visualisation. Although rich in metric quality, these 3D data lack structured information such as semantics and hierarchy between parts. In this context, the introduction of point cloud classification methods can play an essential role for better data usage, model definition, analysis and conservation. The paper aims to extend a machine learning (ML) classification method with a multi-level and multi-resolution (MLMR) approach. The proposed MLMR approach improves the learning process and optimises 3D classification results through a hierarchical concept. The MLMR procedure is tested and evaluated on two large-scale and complex datasets: the Pomposa Abbey (Italy) and the Milan Cathedral (Italy). Classification results show the reliability and replicability of the developed method, allowing the identification of the necessary architectural classes at each geometric resolution.

24 July 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michele RussoMichele Russo
Michele Russo
Augmented reality (AR) allows the real and digital worlds to converge and overlap in a new way of observation and understanding. The architectural field can significantly benefit from AR applications, due to their systemic complexity in terms of knowledge and process management. Global interest and many research challenges are focused on this field, thanks to the conjunction of technological and algorithmic developments from one side, and the massive digitization of built data. A significant quantity of research in the AEC and educational fields describes this state of the art. Moreover, it is a very fragmented domain, in which specific advances or case studies are often described without considering the complexity of the whole development process. The article illustrates the entire AR pipeline development in architecture, from the conceptual phase to its application, highlighting each step’s specific aspects. This storytelling aims to provide a general overview to a non-expert, deepening the topic and stimulating a democratization process. The aware and extended use of AR in multiple areas of application can lead a new way forward for environmental understanding, bridging the gap between real and virtual space in an innovative perception of architecture.

29 July 2010 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gabriele GuidiGabriele Guidi
Gabriele Guidi
Michele RussoMichele Russo
Michele Russo
GMGrazia Magrassi
Grazia Magrassi
Monica BordegoniMonica Bordegoni
Monica Bordegoni
The performance of 2D digital imaging systems depends on several factors related with both optical and electronic processing. These concepts have originated standards, which have been conceived for photographic equipment and bi-dimensional scanning systems, and which have been aimed at estimating different parameters such as resolution, noise or dynamic range. Conversely, no standard test protocols currently exist for evaluating the corresponding performances of 3D imaging systems such as laser scanners or pattern projection range cameras. This paper is focused on investigating experimental processes for evaluating some critical parameters of 3D equipment, by extending the concepts defined by the ISO standards to the 3D domain. The experimental part of this work concerns the characterization of different range sensors through the extraction of their resolution, accuracy and uncertainty from sets of 3D data acquisitions of specifically designed test objects whose geometrical characteristics are known in advance. The major objective of this contribution is to suggest an easy characterization process for generating a reliable comparison between the performances of different range sensors and to check if a specific piece of equipment is compliant with the expected characteristics.

23 August 2006 in Machine Vision and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gabriele GuidiGabriele Guidi
Gabriele Guidi
BFBernard Frischer
Bernard Frischer
Michele RussoMichele Russo
Michele Russo
ASAlessandro Spinetti
Alessandro Spinetti
LCLuca Carosso
Luca Carosso
LMLaura Loredana Micoli
Laura Loredana Micoli

7 April 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dario BilliDario Billi
Dario Billi
Valeria CroceValeria Croce
Valeria Croce
MBMarco Giorgio Bevilacqua
Marco Giorgio Bevilacqua
GCGabriella Caroti
Gabriella Caroti
APAgnese Pasqualetti
Agnese Pasqualetti
Michele RussoMichele Russo
Michele Russo
The reconstruction of 3D geometries starting from reality-based data is challenging and time-consuming due to the difficulties involved in modeling existing structures and the complex nature of built heritage. This paper presents a methodological approach for the automated segmentation and classification of surveying outputs to improve the interpretation and building information modeling from laser scanning and photogrammetric data. The research focused on the surveying of reticular, space grid structures of the late 19th–20th–21st centuries, as part of our architectural heritage, which might require monitoring maintenance activities, and relied on artificial intelligence (machine learning and deep learning) for: (i) the classification of 3D architectural components at multiple levels of detail and (ii) automated masking in standard photogrammetric processing. Focusing on the case study of the grid structure in steel named La Vela in Bologna, the work raises many critical issues in space grid structures in terms of data accuracy, geometric and spatial complexity, semantic classification, and component recognition.
1