Nathalie Cools

Dr. Nathalie Cools

Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Flanders, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 June 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSietse van der Linde
Sietse van der Linde
LSLaura M. Suz
Laura M. Suz
COC. David L. Orme
C. David L. Orme
FCFilipa Cox
Filipa Cox
HAHenning Andreae
Henning Andreae
MBMartin I. Bidartondo
Martin I. Bidartondo
Explaining the large-scale diversity of soil organisms that drive biogeochemical processes—and their responses to environmental change—is critical. However, identifying consistent drivers of belowground diversity and abundance for some soil organisms at large spatial scales remains problematic. Here we investigate a major guild, the ectomycorrhizal fungi, across European forests at a spatial scale and resolution that is—to our knowledge—unprecedented, to explore key biotic and abiotic predictors of ectomycorrhizal diversity and to identify dominant responses and thresholds for change across complex environmental gradients. We show the effect of 38 host, environment, climate and geographical variables on ectomycorrhizal diversity, and define thresholds of community change for key variables. We quantify host specificity and reveal plasticity in functional traits involved in soil foraging across gradients. We conclude that environmental and host factors explain most of the variation in ectomycorrhizal diversity, that the environmental thresholds used as major ecosystem assessment tools need adjustment and that the importance of belowground specificity and plasticity has previously been underappreciated.

1 January 2014 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nathalie CoolsNathalie Cools
Nathalie Cools
LVL. Vesterdal
L. Vesterdal
BVBruno De Vos
Bruno De Vos
EVE. Vanguelova
E. Vanguelova
KHK. Hansen
K. Hansen

1 August 2015 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BVBruno De Vos
Bruno De Vos
Nathalie CoolsNathalie Cools
Nathalie Cools
HIHannu Ilvesniemi
Hannu Ilvesniemi
LVLars Vesterdal
Lars Vesterdal
EVElena Vanguelova
Elena Vanguelova
SCStefano Carnicelli
Stefano Carnicelli

1 September 2011 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Augusto ZanellaAugusto Zanella
Augusto Zanella
BJB. Jabiol
B. Jabiol
Jean-François PongeJean-François Ponge
Jean-François Ponge
GSG. Sartori
G. Sartori
RWR. De Waal
R. De Waal
Michael EnglischMichael Englisch
Michael Englisch

10 April 2014 in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMarta Camino‐Serrano
Marta Camino‐Serrano
BGBert Gielen
Bert Gielen
SLSebastiaan Luyssaert
Sebastiaan Luyssaert
PCPhilippe Ciais
Philippe Ciais
SVSara Vicca
Sara Vicca
IJIvan Janssens
Ivan Janssens
Lateral transport of carbon plays an important role in linking the carbon cycles of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. There is, however, a lack of information on the factors controlling one of the main C sources of this lateral flux, i.e., the concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil solution across large spatial scales and under different soil, vegetation, and climate conditions. We compiled a database on DOC in soil solution down to 80 cm and analyzed it with the aim, first, to quantify the differences in DOC concentrations among terrestrial ecosystems, climate zones, soil, and vegetation types at global scale and second, to identify potential determinants of the site‐to‐site variability of DOC concentration in soil solution across European broadleaved and coniferous forests. We found that DOC concentrations were 75% lower in mineral than in organic soil, and temperate sites showed higher DOC concentrations than boreal and tropical sites. The majority of the variation (R2 = 0.67–0.99) in DOC concentrations in mineral European forest soils correlates with NH4+, C/N, Al, and Fe as the most important predictors. Overall, our results show that the magnitude (23% lower in broadleaved than in coniferous forests) and the controlling factors of DOC in soil solution differ between forest types, with site productivity being more important in broadleaved forests and water balance in coniferous stands.

1 October 2015 in Annals of Forest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UTUlrike Talkner
Ulrike Talkner
KMKarl Josef Meiwes
Karl Josef Meiwes
NPNenad Potočić
Nenad Potočić
ISIvan Seletković
Ivan Seletković
Nathalie CoolsNathalie Cools
Nathalie Cools
Pasi RautioPasi Rautio
Pasi Rautio
Foliar phosphorus concentrations have decreased in Europe during the last 20 years. High atmospheric nitrogen deposition and climate change might be responsible for this trend. Continued decrease in foliar P concentrations might lead to reduced growth and vitality of beech forests in Europe. Increased forest soil acidification, atmospheric nitrogen deposition, and climate change have been shown to affect phosphorus nutrition of forest trees. Low foliar phosphorus levels and high nitrogen/phosphorus ratios have been observed in different European countries and have been related to reduced growth in forests. We test the hypothesis that phosphorus concentrations of European beech (F. sylvatica L.) foliage are decreasing at the European scale. Foliar phosphorus concentrations in beech were monitored on the basis of the “International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests.” Here, data from 12 European countries, comprising 79 plots and a 20-year sampling period (1991–2010), were evaluated. Foliar phosphorus concentrations ranged from 0.81 to 1.66 mg g−1 dw (plot median of the 20-year sampling period). On 22 % of the plots, phosphorus concentrations were in the deficiency range of beech (Mellert and Göttlein 2012). On 62 % of the plots, the nitrogen/phosphorus ratio was above 18.9, which is considered to be disharmonious for beech. In addition, foliar phosphorus concentrations were significantly decreasing by, on average, 13 % from 1.31 to 1.14 mg g−1 in Europe (p < 0.001). Our results show that phosphorus nutrition of beech is impaired in Europe. Possible drivers of this development might be high atmospheric nitrogen deposition and climate change. Continued decrease in foliar phosphorus concentrations, eventually attaining phosphorus deficiency levels, might lead to reduced growth and vitality of beech forests in Europe.