Peter Bruza

Prof. Peter Bruza

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 July 2012
Verified
Book
Closed access
Jerome R BusemeyerJerome R Busemeyer
Jerome R Busemeyer
PBPeter Bruza
Peter Bruza
Much of our understanding of human thinking is based on probabilistic models. This innovative book by Jerome R. Busemeyer and Peter D. Bruza argues that, actually, the underlying mathematical structures from quantum theory provide a much better account of human thinking than traditional models. They introduce the foundations for modeling probabilistic-dynamic systems using two aspects of quantum theory. The first, 'contextuality', is a way to understand interference effects found with inferences and decisions under conditions of uncertainty. The second, 'quantum entanglement', allows cognitive phenomena to be modeled in non-reductionist ways. Employing these principles drawn from quantum theory allows us to view human cognition and decision in a totally new light. Introducing the basic principles in an easy-to-follow way, this book does not assume a physics background or a quantum brain and comes complete with a tutorial and fully worked-out applications in important areas of cognition and decision.

1 July 2015 in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Bruza
Peter Bruza
ZWZheng Wang
Zheng Wang
Jerome R BusemeyerJerome R Busemeyer
Jerome R Busemeyer

1 October 2009 in Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Bruza
Peter Bruza
KKKirsty Kitto
Kirsty Kitto
DNDouglas Nelson
Douglas Nelson
CMCathy McEvoy
Cathy McEvoy

1 August 2015 in Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Bruza
Peter Bruza
KKKirsty Kitto
Kirsty Kitto
BRBrentyn J. Ramm
Brentyn J. Ramm
LSLaurianne Sitbon
Laurianne Sitbon

31 October 2005
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
JBJing Bai
Jing Bai
DSDawei Song
Dawei Song
PBPeter Bruza
Peter Bruza
JNJian-Yun Nie
Jian-Yun Nie
GCGuihong Cao
Guihong Cao
Language Modeling (LM) has been successfully applied to Information Retrieval (IR). However, most of the existing LM approaches only rely on term occurrences in documents, queries and document collections. In traditional unigram based models, terms (or words) are usually considered to be independent. In some recent studies, dependence models have been proposed to incorporate term relationships into LM, so that links can be created between words in the same sentence, and term relationships (e.g. synonymy) can be used to expand the document model. In this study, we further extend this family of dependence models in the following two ways: (1) Term relationships are used to expand query model instead of document model, so that query expansion process can be naturally implemented; (2) We exploit more sophisticated inferential relationships extracted with Information Flow (IF). Information flow relationships are not simply pairwise term relationships as those used in previous studies, but are between a set of terms and another term. They allow for context-dependent query expansion. Our experiments conducted on TREC collections show that we can obtain large and significant improvements with our approach. This study shows that LM is an appropriate framework to implement effective query expansion.

3 November 2014
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
LVLance De Vine
Lance De Vine
GZGuido Zuccon
Guido Zuccon
BKBevan Koopman
Bevan Koopman
LSLaurianne Sitbon
Laurianne Sitbon
PBPeter Bruza
Peter Bruza
Advances in neural network language models have demonstrated that these models can effectively learn representations of words meaning. In this paper, we explore a variation of neural language models that can learn on concepts taken from structured ontologies and extracted from free-text, rather than directly from terms in free-text. \ud \ud This model is employed for the task of measuring semantic similarity between medical concepts, a task that is central to a number of techniques in medical informatics and information retrieval. The model is built with two medical corpora (journal abstracts and patient records) and empirically validated on two ground-truth datasets of human-judged concept pairs assessed by medical professionals. Empirically, our approach correlates closely with expert human assessors ($\approx$ 0.9) and outperforms a number of state-of-the-art benchmarks for medical semantic similarity. \ud \ud The demonstrated superiority of this model for providing an effective semantic similarity measure is promising in that this may translate into effectiveness gains for techniques in medical information retrieval and medical informatics (e.g., query expansion and literature-based discovery)