Renata Mendizabal

Mrs. Renata Mendizabal

Center for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Guatemala
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 December 2015 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FRFrank Richards
Frank Richards
NRNidia Rizzo
Nidia Rizzo
CECarlos Enrique Diaz Espinoza
Carlos Enrique Diaz Espinoza
ZMZoraida Morales Monroy
Zoraida Morales Monroy
CVCarol Guillermina Crovella Valdez
Carol Guillermina Crovella Valdez
ADAlfredo Domínguez
Alfredo Domínguez
We report the elimination of Onchocerca volvulus transmission from the Central Endemic Zone (CEZ) of onchocerciasis in Guatemala, the largest focus of this disease in the Americas and the first to be discovered in this hemisphere by Rodolfo Robles Valverde in 1915. Mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin was launched in 1988, with semiannual MDA coverage reaching at least 85% of the eligible population in > 95% of treatment rounds during the 12-year period, 2000–2011. Serial parasitological testing to monitor MDA impact in sentinel villages showed a decrease in microfilaria skin prevalence from 70% to 0%, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based entomological assessments of the principal vector Simulium ochraceum s.l. showed transmission interruption by 2007. These assessments, together with a 2010 serological survey in children 9–69 months of age that showed Ov16 IgG4 antibody prevalence to be < 0.1%, meeting World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for stopping MDA, and treatment was halted after 2011. After 3 years an entomological assessment showed no evidence of vector infection or recrudescence of transmission. In 2015, 100 years after the discovery of its presence, the Ministry of Health of Guatemala declared onchocerciasis transmission as having been eliminated from the CEZ.

7 July 2021 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jay P. GrahamJay P. Graham
Jay P. Graham
HAHeather Amato
Heather Amato
Renata MendizabalRenata Mendizabal
Renata Mendizabal
DADanilo Alvarez
Danilo Alvarez
BRBrooke M. Ramay
Brooke M. Ramay
: The presence of intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in drinking water is well recognized as a risk for diarrhea. The role of drinking water in extraintestinal infections caused by E. coli—such as urinary tract infections (UTIs)—remains poorly understood. Urinary tract infections are a leading cause of outpatient infections globally, with a lifetime incidence of 50–60% in adult women. We reviewed the scientific literature on the occurrence of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) in water supplies to determine whether the waterborne route may be an important, overlooked, source of UPEC. A limited number of studies have assessed whether UPEC isolates are present in drinking water supplies, but no studies have measured whether their presence in water may increase UPEC colonization or the risk of UTIs in humans. Given the prevalence of drinking water supplies contaminated with E. coli across the globe, efforts should be made to characterize UTI-related risks associated with drinking water, as well as other pathways of exposure.

23 December 2022 in Health Research Policy and Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJulio Arturo Canario Guzmán
Julio Arturo Canario Guzmán
JOJessie Orlich
Jessie Orlich
Renata MendizabalRenata Mendizabal
Renata Mendizabal
AYArgentina Ying
Argentina Ying
CVClaude Vergès
Claude Vergès
JAJackeline Alger
Jackeline Alger
Background: Good governance and regulatory supervision are required to conduct research in an international public health emergency context and to ensure compliance with ethical standards. The “Strengthening research ethics governance and regulatory oversight in Central America and the Dominican Republic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic” study is a regional effort in which research ethics stakeholders participated in addressing research ethics governance and preparedness response challenges to the COVID-19 pandemic in Central America and the Dominican Republic. Methods: A qualitative action research study was conducted following a participatory approach. Research ethics stakeholders in Central America and the Dominican Republic were mapped; a regional webinar and three virtual workshops were conducted discussing research ethics governance, ethics review and collaborative research practice during the pandemic. A roundtable session presented results and obtained feedback on a draft of a policy to strengthen regional research ethics governance. Results: Countries across Central America and the Dominican Republic are at different stages in their development of research ethics systems. Countries with more established systems before COVID-19 were better organized and prepared to respond. This finding argues against improvisation and supports further work on strengthening governance of research ethics systems. Community engagement in research ethics public policy-making is practically absent in the region. Research and research ethics collaboration schemes are lacking amongst the countries; however, there are incipient initiatives in the region, such as the Central America and Caribbean Network of Research Ethics Committees. A policy brief with recommendations on how to advance towards strengthening the governance of research ethics systems was prepared and submitted to the Central American Integration System for analysis and possible approval. Conclusion: National research ethics systems in Central America and the Dominican Republic were unprepared to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to research oversight and effective collaboration. In most cases, national research ethics systems were found to be weak, and regional research collaboration was practically absent. To promote collaboration, a joint strategy needs to be developed with a regional vision towards sharing knowledge and best practices.

24 June 2016 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFrank O. Richards
Frank O. Richards
RKRobert E. Klein
Robert E. Klein
OLOscar de León
Oscar de León
Renata MendizabalRenata Mendizabal
Renata Mendizabal
AMAlba Lucía Morales
Alba Lucía Morales
NRNidia Rizzo
Nidia Rizzo
Mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin for onchocerciasis was provided in Guatemala’s Central Endemic Zone (CEZ) over a 24 year period (1988–2011). Elimination of Onchocerca volvulus transmission was declared in 2015 after a three year post MDA surveillance period (2012–2014) showed no evidence of recrudescence. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) towards onchocerciasis and ivermectin among residents in the post endemic CEZ. A major interest in this study was to determine what community residents thought about the end of the ivermectin MDA program. A total of 148 interviews were conducted in November 2014 in four formerly hyperendemic communities using a standard questionnaire on smart phones. The majority (69%) of respondents knew that the MDA program had ended because the disease was no longer present in their communities, but a slight majority (53%) was personally unsure that onchocerciasis had really been eliminated. Sixty-three percent wanted to continue to receive ivermectin because of this uncertainty, or because ivermectin is effective against intestinal worms. Eighty-nine percent of respondents said that they would seek medical attention immediately if a family member had symptoms of onchocerciasis (especially the presence of a nodule), which is a finding very important for ongoing surveillance. Many respondents wanted to continue receive ivermectin and more than half did not believe onchocerciasis had been eliminated. The ministry of health outreach services should be prepared to address ongoing concerns about onchocerciasis in the post endemic CEZ. Human onchocerciasis (also known as ‘River Blindness’) is a parasitic disease of the skin and eyes whose etiological agent (Onchocerca volvulus) is transmitted by black flies. Guatemala was the country in the Americas most afflicted by onchocerciasis, and the largest focus of onchocerciasis in Guatemala was the Central Endemic Zone (CEZ). In the late 1980’s the Guatemalan ministry of health launched an onchocerciasis transmission elimination program based on mass drug administration (MDA) with the medicine ivermectin (Mectizan) in affected communities. Health education messages based on community knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) surveys were designed to enhance understanding and sustain participation in the MDA program. The first KAP survey (published 1991) recommended the elements of the health education program. The second KAP survey (published 1995) identified barriers preventing the achievement of adequate treatment coverage, and recommended adjustments to program activities to improve participation. This third KAP survey was conducted in 2014, almost 3 years after cessation of the MDA program. Results indicated that many respondents wanted ivermectin MDA to continue in their community because of uncertainty about onchocerciasis elimination, or in order to treat intestinal worms. The ministry of health outreach services should be prepared to address ongoing concerns of the populations residing in post endemic, post MDA onchocerciasis Guatemala.

LOLauren O'Neal
Lauren O'Neal
DADanilo Alvarez
Danilo Alvarez
Renata MendizabalRenata Mendizabal
Renata Mendizabal
BRBrooke M. Ramay
Brooke M. Ramay
Jay P. GrahamJay P. Graham
Jay P. Graham
Community-acquired antimicrobial resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CA-ARE) are an increasingly important issue around the world. Characterizing the distribution of regionally specific patterns of resistance is important to contextualize and develop locally relevant interventions. This systematic review adopts a One Health framework considering the health of humans, animals, and the environment to describe CA-ARE in Central America. Twenty studies were identified that focused on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Enterobacteriaceae. Studies on CA-ARE in Central America characterized resistance from diverse sources, including humans (n = 12), animals (n = 4), the environment (n = 2), and combinations of these categories (n = 2). A limited number of studies assessed prevalence of clinically important AMR, including carbapenem resistance (n = 3), third generation cephalosporin resistance (n = 7), colistin resistance (n = 2), extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production (n = 4), or multidrug resistance (n = 4). This review highlights significant gaps in our current understanding of CA-ARE in Central America, most notably a general dearth of research, which requires increased investment and research on CA-ARE as well as AMR more broadly.

7 May 2021 in Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Renata MendizabalRenata Mendizabal
Renata Mendizabal
IPIsabel Pérez
Isabel Pérez
VMVíctor Becerril Montekio
Víctor Becerril Montekio
FPFreddy Perez
Freddy Perez
EDErick Durán
Erick Durán
MTMei L. Trueba
Mei L. Trueba
Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), endemic in Guatemala, mostly affects poor people living in the northern region. A national control program that includes surveillance, diagnose, and treatment offered free of cost by the Ministry of Health (MoH) has been in place since 2003. However, the incidence is increasing and treatment rates are not optimal, suggesting that current efforts are not being effective. This study aimed to understand barriers and facilitators of CL control in Guatemala as experienced and perceived by key stakeholders in order to comprehend what works well and does not and suggest evidence-informed interventions. Methods: The study was conducted in the Cobán municipality, the most endemic of Guatemala, situated in the Department of Alta Verapaz. Data were collected during May and June 2019 via focus groups and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including local and national health personnel and residents of four communities of the endemic region. Thematic and content analysis of the collected data was conducted using NVIVO. Results: Three overarching issues hamper the effectiveness of current CL efforts: resource scarcity, treatment challenges, and knowledge-action gaps. Scarce economic resources from the MoH and community residents negatively impact incidence, detection of cases and treatment rates in that preventive action is insufficient and healthcare access is low. In addition, local health workers often lack specialized CL training and access to the national CL control guidelines. With regards to the population living in the study area, misunderstanding of disease causation, shame associated with CL lesions, treatment pain fear, and long (often uncertain) waiting times for diagnose and treatment negatively affect people’s willingness to seek help, treatment adherence, and their trust on the healthcare provided. Conclusions: Culturally sensitive CL preventive action must be developed. Given the scarce economic resources available for CL control in the country, the involvement of trained community health workers and the inclusion of thermotherapy as a treatment option is also advised. Other cost-effective actions include: ensuring all health workers receive CL training and have access to national CL control guidelines, improving national procurement system to avoid treatment shortages, and provision of motorized vehicles to increase active surveillance and treatment rates. Graphical