Robin J. L. Hartley

Mr. Robin J. L. Hartley

Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 December 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Robin J. L. HartleyRobin J. L. Hartley
Robin J. L. Hartley
ELEllen Mae Leonardo
Ellen Mae Leonardo
PMPeter David Massam
Peter David Massam
MWMichael S. Stuart Watt
Michael S. Stuart Watt
HEHoney Jane Estarija
Honey Jane Estarija
GPGrant Pearse
Grant Pearse
The measurement of forestry trials is a costly and time-consuming process. Over the past few years, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have provided some significant developments that could improve cost and time efficiencies. However, little research has examined the accuracies of these technologies for measuring young trees. This study compared the data captured by a UAV laser scanning system (ULS), and UAV structure from motion photogrammetry (SfM), with traditional field-measured heights in a series of forestry trials in the central North Island of New Zealand. Data were captured from UAVs, and then processed into point clouds, from which heights were derived and compared to field measurements. The results show that predictions from both ULS and SfM were very strongly correlated to tree heights (R2 = 0.99, RMSE = 5.91%, and R2 = 0.94, RMSE = 18.5%, respectively) but that the height underprediction was markedly lower for ULS than SfM (Mean Bias Error = 0.05 vs. 0.38 m). Integration of a ULS DTM to the SfM made a minor improvement in precision (R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 16.5%). Through plotting error against tree height, we identified a minimum threshold of 1 m, under which the accuracy of height measurements using ULS and SfM significantly declines. Our results show that SfM and ULS data collected from UAV remote sensing can be used to accurately measure height in young forestry trials. It is hoped that this study will give foresters and tree breeders the confidence to start to operationalise this technology for monitoring trials.

11 July 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Robin J. L. HartleyRobin J. L. Hartley
Robin J. L. Hartley
SJSadeepa Jayathunga
Sadeepa Jayathunga
PMPeter David Massam
Peter David Massam
DSDilshan De Silva
Dilshan De Silva
HEHoney Jane Estarija
Honey Jane Estarija
GPGrant Pearse
Grant Pearse
Phenotyping has been a reality for aiding the selection of optimal crops for specific environments for decades in various horticultural industries. However, until recently, phenotyping was less accessible to tree breeders due to the size of the crop, the length of the rotation and the difficulty in acquiring detailed measurements. With the advent of affordable and non-destructive technologies, such as mobile laser scanners (MLS), phenotyping of mature forests is now becoming practical. Despite the potential of MLS technology, few studies included detailed assessments of its accuracy in mature plantations. In this study, we assessed a novel, high-density MLS operated below canopy for its ability to derive phenotypic measurements from mature Pinus radiata. MLS data were co-registered with above-canopy UAV laser scanner (ULS) data and imported to a pipeline that segments individual trees from the point cloud before extracting tree-level metrics. The metrics studied include tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), stem volume and whorl characteristics. MLS-derived tree metrics were compared to field measurements and metrics derived from ULS alone. Our pipeline was able to segment individual trees with a success rate of 90.3%. We also observed strong agreement between field measurements and MLS-derived DBH (R2 = 0.99, RMSE = 5.4%) and stem volume (R2 = 0.99, RMSE = 10.16%). Additionally, we proposed a new variable height method for deriving DBH to avoid swelling, with an overall accuracy of 52% for identifying the correct method for where to take the diameter measurement. A key finding of this study was that MLS data acquired from below the canopy was able to derive canopy heights with a level of accuracy comparable to a high-end ULS scanner (R2 = 0.94, RMSE = 3.02%), negating the need for capturing above-canopy data to obtain accurate canopy height models. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate that even in mature forests, MLS technology holds strong potential for advancing forest phenotyping and tree measurement.

11 January 2023 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMichael S. Stuart Watt
Michael S. Stuart Watt
TPTomás Poblete
Tomás Poblete
DSDilshan de Silva
Dilshan de Silva
HEHoney Jane C. Estarija
Honey Jane C. Estarija
Robin J. L. HartleyRobin J. L. Hartley
Robin J. L. Hartley
PZPablo J. Zarco-Tejada
Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada

4 July 2022 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Robin J. L. HartleyRobin J. L. Hartley
Robin J. L. Hartley
Isaac Levi HendersonIsaac Levi Henderson
Isaac Levi Henderson
CJChris Lewis Jackson
Chris Lewis Jackson
This article presents a review about Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) operations using unmanned aircraft in forest environments. Forest environments present unique challenges for unmanned aircraft operations due to the presence of trees as obstacles, hilly terrain, and remote areas. BVLOS operations help overcome some of these unique challenges; however, these are not widespread due to a number of technical, operational, and regulatory considerations. To help progress the application of BVLOS unmanned aircraft operations in forest environments, this article reviews the latest literature, practices, and regulations, as well as incorporates the practical experience of the authors. The unique characteristics of the operating environment are addressed alongside a clear argument as to how BVLOS operations can help overcome key challenges. The international regulatory environment is appraised with regard to BVLOS operations, highlighting differences between countries, despite commonalities in the considerations that they take into account. After addressing these points, technological, operational, and other considerations are presented and may be taken into account when taking a risk-based approach to BVLOS operations, with gaps for future research to address clearly highlighted. In totality, this article provides a practical understanding of how BVLOS unmanned aircraft operations can be done in forest environments, as well as provides a basis for future research into the topic area.

1 October 2020 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMichael S. Watt
Michael S. Watt
Henning BuddenbaumHenning Buddenbaum
Henning Buddenbaum
ELEllen Mae C. Leonardo
Ellen Mae C. Leonardo
HEHoney Jane Estarija
Honey Jane Estarija
HBHoracio E. Bown
Horacio E. Bown
PZPablo J. Zarco-Tejada
Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada

22 May 2024 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMichael S. Stuart Watt
Michael S. Stuart Watt
SJSadeepa Jayathunga
Sadeepa Jayathunga
Robin J. L. HartleyRobin J. L. Hartley
Robin J. L. Hartley
GPGrant Pearse
Grant Pearse
PMPeter David Massam
Peter David Massam
HEHoney Jane Estarija
Honey Jane Estarija
The management of plantation forests using precision forestry requires advanced inventory methods. Unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning (ULS) offers a cost-effective approach to accurately estimate forest structural attributes at both plot and individual tree levels. We examined the utility of ULS data collected from a radiata pine stand for tree detection and prediction of diameter at breast height (DBH) and stem volume, using data thinned to 13-point densities (ranging from 10–12,200 points/m2). These datasets were created using a DTM with the highest pulse density and DTMs that used the native decimated point clouds. Models of DBH were constructed using partial least squares (PLS) and random forest (RF) from seven classes of metrics that characterized the horizontal and vertical structure of the canopy. Individual tree segmentation was consistently accurate across the 13-point densities and was insensitive to DTM type (F1 scores > 0.96). Predictions of DBH using PLS models were consistently more accurate than RF models and accuracy was insensitive to the DTM type. Using data from the native DTMs, DBH estimation using PLS had the lowest RMSE of 1.624 cm (R2 of 0.756) at a point density of 12,200 points/m2. Stem volume predictions made using PLS predictions of DBH and height from the ULS had the lowest RMSE of 0.0418 m3 (R2 of 0.792) at 12,200 points/m2. The RMSE values for DBH and volume remained relatively stable from 12,200 to between 750 and 400 points/m2, with reductions in accuracy occurring as point density declined below this threshold. Overall, these findings have significant implications, particularly for the precise estimation of DBH and stem volume at the individual tree level. They demonstrate the potential of cost-effective ULS sensors for rapid and frequent plantation forest assessment, thereby enhancing the application of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology in plantation forest management.