Composite modular panels are increasingly used in modern buildings, yet their layered behavior makes mechanical characterization and modeling difficult. This study presents a novel hybrid framework that integrates analytical, numerical, and AI-driven approaches for the mechanical characterization of composite panels. The system combines a layered concrete configuration with embedded steel reinforcement, and its performance was evaluated through experimental testing, analytical formulation, finite element simulations, and artificial intelligence techniques. Full-scale bending and shear tests were conducted and results in terms of displacements were compared with in silico simulations. The equivalent elastic modulus and thickness were suggested via a closed-form analytical procedure and validated numerically, showing less than 3% deviation from experiments. These equivalent parameters were used to simulate the dynamic response of a two-storey prototype building under harmonic excitation, with simulated modal periods differing by less than 10% from experimental data. To generalize the method, a parametric dataset of 218 panel configurations was generated by varying material and geometric properties. Machine learning models including Artificial Neural Network, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Extra Trees were trained on this dataset, achieving R² > 0.98 for both targets. A graphical user interface was developed to integrate the trained models into an engineering tool for fast prediction of equivalent properties. The proposed methodology provides a unified and computationally efficient approach that combines physical accuracy with practical usability, enabling rapid design and optimization of composite panel structures.

This paper describes the Field Boundary Element Method (FBEM) applied to the fracture analysis of a 2D rectangular plate made of Functionally Graded Material (FGM) to calculate Mode I Stress Intensity Factor (SIF). The case study of this Field Boundary Element Method is the transversely isotropic plane plate. Its material presents an exponential variation of the elasticity tensor depending on a scalar function of position, i.e., the elastic tensor results from multiplying a scalar function by a constant taken as a reference. Several examples using a parametric representation of the structural response show the suitability of the method that constitutes a Stress Intensity Factor evaluation of Functionally Graded Materials plane plates even in the case of more complex geometries.

Safety assessment of structures can be obtained employing limit design to overcome uncertainties concerning actual response due to inelastic constitutive behavior and more generally to non-linear structural response and loads’ random variability. The limit analysis is used for evaluating the safety of the structures, starting directly from load level without any knowledge of the load history. In the paper, the lower bound calculation is proposed where a new strain-based approach is used that allowed describing the residual stress and displacement in terms of permanent strain. The strategy uses the permanent strain as effective parameters of the procedure so that it is possible to assess the ductility requirements for the complete load program developed till collapse or shakedown. The procedure is compared to experimental results obtained on aluminum beams in shakedown.

The calculation of the collapse load of spherical domes is addressed using a semianalytical approach under the hypothesis of small displacements and perfect plasticity. The procedure is based on the numerical approximation of the self-stress that represents the projection of the balance equilibrium null space on a finite dimensional manifold. The so-obtained self-equilibrated stress span is superimposed onto a finite-element linear elastic solution to the prescribed loads yielding to the statically admissible set accordingly to Melan’s theorem. The compatibility of the stress with the constitutive law of the material was enforced using a linearized limit domain in terms of generalized stress, namely, axial force and bending moment along the local spherical curvilinear coordinates. The procedure was tested with reference to numerical and experimental data from the literature, confirming the accuracy of the proposed method. A comparison with the literature confirms that the buckling load was much greater than the two plastic collapse loads calculated through the proposed procedure and reported in the quoted literature.