There are two surgical approaches to performing total hip arthroplasty (THA): a cemented or uncemented type of prosthesis. The choice is usually based on the experience of the orthopaedic surgeon and on parameters such as the age and gender of the patient. Using machine learning (ML) techniques on quantitative biomechanical and bone quality data extracted from computed tomography, electromyography and gait analysis, the aim of this paper was, firstly, to help clinicians use patient-specific biomarkers from diagnostic exams in the prosthetic decision-making process. The second aim was to evaluate patient long-term outcomes by predicting the bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal and distal parts of the femur using advanced image processing analysis techniques and ML. The ML analyses were performed on diagnostic patient data extracted from a national database of 51 THA patients using the Knime analytics platform. The classification analysis achieved 93% accuracy in choosing the type of prosthesis; the regression analysis on the BMD data showed a coefficient of determination of about 0.6. The start and stop of the electromyographic signals were identified as the best predictors. This study shows a patient-specific approach could be helpful in the decision-making process and provide clinicians with information regarding the follow up of patients.

Total Hip Arthroplasty requires pre-surgical evaluation between un-cemented and cemented prostheses. A Patient with intra-operative periprosthetic fracture and another with a successful outcome were recruited, and their finite element models were constructed by processing CT data, assuming elastic-plastic behavior of the bone as function of the local density. To resemble the insertion of the prosthesis into the femur, a fictitious thermal dilatation is applied to the broach volume. Strain-based fracture risk factor is estimated, depicting results in terms of the total mechanical strain expressed using a simple “traffic lights” color code to provide immediate, concise, and intelligible pre-operative information to surgeons.

Composite modular panels are increasingly used in modern buildings, yet their layered behavior makes mechanical characterization and modeling difficult. This study presents a novel hybrid framework that integrates analytical, numerical, and AI-driven approaches for the mechanical characterization of composite panels. The system combines a layered concrete configuration with embedded steel reinforcement, and its performance was evaluated through experimental testing, analytical formulation, finite element simulations, and artificial intelligence techniques. Full-scale bending and shear tests were conducted and results in terms of displacements were compared with in silico simulations. The equivalent elastic modulus and thickness were suggested via a closed-form analytical procedure and validated numerically, showing less than 3% deviation from experiments. These equivalent parameters were used to simulate the dynamic response of a two-storey prototype building under harmonic excitation, with simulated modal periods differing by less than 10% from experimental data. To generalize the method, a parametric dataset of 218 panel configurations was generated by varying material and geometric properties. Machine learning models including Artificial Neural Network, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Extra Trees were trained on this dataset, achieving R² > 0.98 for both targets. A graphical user interface was developed to integrate the trained models into an engineering tool for fast prediction of equivalent properties. The proposed methodology provides a unified and computationally efficient approach that combines physical accuracy with practical usability, enabling rapid design and optimization of composite panel structures.