UTPAL K. DHAR

Mr. UTPAL K. DHAR

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 October 2023 in Asian Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
maohua linmaohua lin
maohua lin
RPRudy Paul
Rudy Paul
UDUTPAL K. DHAR
UTPAL K. DHAR
JDJames Doulgeris
James Doulgeris
TOTimothy E. O’cOnnor
Timothy E. O’cOnnor
FVFrank D. Vrionis
Frank D. Vrionis
The cervical spine poses many complex challenges that require complex solutions. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been one such technique often employed to address such issues. In order to address the problems with ACDF and assess the modifications that have been made to the technique over time, finite element analyses (FEA) have proven to be an effective tool. The variations of cervical spine FEA models that have been produced over the past couple of decades, particularly more recent representations of more complex geometries, have not yet been identified and characterized in any literature. Our objective was to present material property models and cervical spine models for various simulation purposes. The outlining and refinement of the FEA process will yield more reliable outcomes and provide a stable basis for the modeling protocols of the cervical spine.

1 December 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
maohua linmaohua lin
maohua lin
RPRudy Paul
Rudy Paul
XLXinqin Liao
Xinqin Liao
JDJames Doulgeris
James Doulgeris
EMEmma Lilly Menzer
Emma Lilly Menzer
FVFrank D. Vrionis
Frank D. Vrionis
Cervical degenerative disc diseases such as myelopathy and radiculopathy often require conventional treatments like artificial cervical disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). When designing a medical device, like the stand-alone cage, there are many design inputs to consider. However, the precise biomechanics of the force between the vertebrae and implanted devices under certain conditions require further investigation. In this study, a new method was developed to evaluate the pressure between the vertebrae and implanted devices by embedding a sensor array into a 3D-printed C2-C3 cervical spine. The 3D-printed cervical spine model was subjected to a range of axial loads while under flexion, extension, bending and compression conditions. Cables were used for the application of a preload and a robotic arm was used to recreate the natural spine motions (flexion, extension, and bending). To verify and predict the total pressure between the vertebrae and the implanted devices, a 3D finite element (FE) numerical mathematical model was developed. A preload was represented by applying 22 N of force on each of the anterior tubercles for the C2 vertebra. The results of this study suggest that the sensor is useful in identifying static pressure. The pressure with the robot arm was verified from the FE results under all conditions. This study indicates that the sensor array has promising potential to reduce the trial and error with implants for various surgical procedures, including multi-level artificial cervical disk replacement and ACDF, which may help clinicians to reduce pain, suffering, and costly follow-up procedures.

19 June 2025 in Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UDUTPAL K. DHAR
UTPAL K. DHAR
KAKamran Aghayev
Kamran Aghayev
HSHadi Sultan
Hadi Sultan
SRSaahas Rajendran
Saahas Rajendran
CTChi-Tay Tsai
Chi-Tay Tsai
FVFrank D. Vrionis
Frank D. Vrionis
The traditional bilateral pedicle screw system has been used for the treatment of various lumbar spine conditions including advanced degenerative disc disease. However, there is an ongoing need to develop more effective and less invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the traditional bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS) with the novel reverse transdiscal screw system (RTSS) for lumbar disc degenerative disease. A 3D solid lumbar L1–L5 spine model was developed and validated based on a human CT scan. Fusions were simulated at L3–L4. The first scenario comprised a transforaminal lumbar interbody cage in combination with the bilateral pedicle screw-rod system (BPSS-TLIF). In the second scenario, the same TLIF cage was combined with reverse L3–L4 transdiscal screws (RTSS-TLIF). Testing parameters included range of motion (ROM) in three orthogonal axes, hardware (cage and screw) stress, and shear load resistance. The ROM of the surgical model was reduced by approximately 90% compared to the intact model at the fused level. The RTSS model demonstrated less ROM compared to the BPSS model at the fused level for all loading conditions. Overall, the RTSS model exhibited lower stress on both screws and cage compared with the BPSS model in all biomechanical testing conditions. The RTSS model also exhibited higher anterior and posterior shear load resistance than the BPSS model. In conclusion, the RTSS model proved superior to the BPSS model in all respects. These findings indicate that the RTSS could serve as a feasible option for patients undergoing lumbar fusion, especially for adjacent segment disease, potentially enhancing surgical outcomes for disc degeneration.

14 July 2026 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSushil Chapai
Sushil Chapai
UDUTPAL K. DHAR
UTPAL K. DHAR
DPDerek Francis Papp
Derek Francis Papp
CTChi-Tay Tsai
Chi-Tay Tsai
AMAnthony Miniaci
Anthony Miniaci