Verónica Gómez-Gil

Dr. Verónica Gómez-Gil

University of Alcalá
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2008 in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGemma Pascual
Gemma Pascual
MRMarta Rodríguez
Marta Rodríguez
Verónica Gómez-GilVerónica Gómez-Gil
Verónica Gómez-Gil
Natalio GArcia-HonduvillaNatalio GArcia-Honduvilla
Natalio GArcia-Honduvilla
M. Julia BujánM. Julia Buján
M. Julia Buján
JBJuan Manuel Bellón
Juan Manuel Bellón

6 October 2008 in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJuan Manuel Bellón
Juan Manuel Bellón
MRM. Rodríguez
M. Rodríguez
Natalio GArcia-HonduvillaNatalio GArcia-Honduvilla
Natalio GArcia-Honduvilla
Verónica Gómez-GilVerónica Gómez-Gil
Verónica Gómez-Gil
GPGemma Pascual
Gemma Pascual
M. Julia BujánM. Julia Buján
M. Julia Buján

1 April 2007 in Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJuan Manuel Bellón
Juan Manuel Bellón
MRMarta Rodríguez
Marta Rodríguez
Natalio GArcia-HonduvillaNatalio GArcia-Honduvilla
Natalio GArcia-Honduvilla
GPGemma Pascual
Gemma Pascual
Verónica Gómez-GilVerónica Gómez-Gil
Verónica Gómez-Gil
M. Julia BujánM. Julia Buján
M. Julia Buján
Background: The prosthetic materials currently used to repair abdominal wall defects sometimes have to be placed in contact with the visceral peritoneum. This interface is often a site of complications such as intestinal obstruction or fistulas due to adhesions. The aim of this study was to follow the process of adhesion formation in several prosthetic materials by sequential laparoscopy. Material and Methods: Defects (7 × 5 cm) were created in the abdominal wall of 30 New Zealand White rabbits and repaired using Surgipro polypropylene mesh (PP), Ultrapro monocryl-prolene mesh (UP), Dual Mesh expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), Composix (PP-ePTFE), Parietex Composite (polyester with collagen-polyethylene glycol-glycerol coating [PO-gl]), or PL-PU99 (PP-polyurethane) patches fixed to the edges of the defect by running polypropylene suture. Adhesions to the implants were laparoscopically determined at 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery. Results: Percentage adhesion scores were significantly lower for ePTFE, PP-ePTFE, PO-gl, and PP-PU, compared to PP or UP. No differences were observed in adhesion scores recorded at 3, 7, and 14 days postimplant. Reticular prostheses were infiltrated by disorganized scar tissue with fibers concentric to the mesh filaments. In contrast, ePTFE implants were encapsulated by organized tissue, with fibers running parallel to the surface of biomaterial. All three composites achieved good recipient tissue integration and a homogeneous, organized, and well-vascularized neoperitoneum. Conclusion: At 14 days postimplant, laminar prostheses and composites showed similar results in terms of adhesion formation and integration within host tissue. Our findings suggest that both the composite prostheses and the laminar ePTFE performed very well in terms of reduced adhesion formation at the peritoneal interface.

1 September 2020 in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAlberto Cifuentes
Alberto Cifuentes
Verónica Gómez-GilVerónica Gómez-Gil
Verónica Gómez-Gil
Miguel A. OrtegaMiguel A. Ortega
Miguel A. Ortega
AAAngel Asúnsolo
Angel Asúnsolo
SCSantiago Coca
Santiago Coca
NGNatalio García-Honduvilla
Natalio García-Honduvilla
Diabetes mellitus causes severe impairment in the cutaneous wound healing process, which has led to extensive research striving to establish new treatments. In this work, we describe the effects of chitosan hydrogels functionalized with either unfractionated heparin or bemiparin (a low molecular weight heparin, LMWH) as topical treatments in an experimental diabetic wound healing model. Although wound morphometry showed similar values at the end of the study, microscopic analyses revealed impaired healing in diabetic animals in terms of inflammation and tissue formation. However, both types of loaded hydrogels accelerated inflammation resolution and improved the epithelialization process, while showing a neodermal thickness similar to that of nondiabetic animals. Immunohistochemistry analyses revealed an intermediate response in macrophage evolution between diabetic and nondiabetic controls in the treated groups, as well as enhanced collagenization and myofibroblast progression patterns. However, these changes were not accompanied by differences among groups in collagen I, III and TGF-β1 gene expression. Functionalized hydrogels improved diabetes-associated impaired wound healing, thus promoting the progression of the process and inducing the formation of high-quality cicatricial tissue. Although the beneficial healing effect observed after topical treatment with chitosan hydrogels loaded with bemiparin or unfractionated heparin was similar, the chitosan hydrogel loaded with bemiparin is the preferred choice as it exhibited high-quality tissue in the neoformed dermal tissue.

1 January 2008 in Journal of Investigative Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJuan Manuel Bellón
Juan Manuel Bellón
MRMarta Rodríguez
Marta Rodríguez
Natalio GArcia-HonduvillaNatalio GArcia-Honduvilla
Natalio GArcia-Honduvilla
Verónica Gómez-GilVerónica Gómez-Gil
Verónica Gómez-Gil
GPGemma Pascual
Gemma Pascual
M. Julia BujánM. Julia Buján
M. Julia Buján
Over the years, reticular prostheses have undergone changes in their structure and composition to give rise to today's partially absorbable lightweight meshes. This study was designed to assess the biological and biomechanical behavior of these prostheses to establish whether they offer any advantages over nonabsorbable lightweight polypropylene prostheses. 7 x 5 cm defects were created in the anterior abdominal wall of New Zealand White rabbits and repaired by securing different prostheses to the edges of the defect with a running 4/0 polypropylene suture. The lightweight biomaterials compared were two nonabsorbable meshes: Parietene and Optilene elastic, and two partially absorbable prostheses: Vypro II and Ultrapro. At 14 and 90 days postimplant, tissue/prosthesis specimens were subjected to histological, immunohistochemical, shrinkage, and biomechanical analyses. Adhesion formation on the peritoneum-facing surface of the meshes was significantly less extensive in the meshes with absorbable components at 90 days postimplant. The newly formed tissue around the prosthetic filaments was comprised of collagen fibers, fibroblasts, blood vessels, and macrophages. The partially absorbable meshes showed higher macrophage proportions (due to remnants of absorbable material and their structure) than the nonabsorbable meshes at 90 days, although differences were not significant. At 90 days postimplant, similar tensile strengths were recorded for all the implants. All the prosthetic materials induced good host tissue ingrowth, with no significant differences in tensile strength observed. Our findings suggest that partially absorbable lightweight prostheses could offer advantages over nonabsorbable lightweight meshes since less foreign material persists in the recipient, improving abdominal wall compliance.

16 August 2010 in European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GPGemma Pascual
Gemma Pascual
MRMarta Rodríguez
Marta Rodríguez
Verónica Gómez-GilVerónica Gómez-Gil
Verónica Gómez-Gil
CTCynthia Trejo
Cynthia Trejo
M. Julia BujánM. Julia Buján
M. Julia Buján
JBJuan Manuel Bellón
Juan Manuel Bellón