VERA L TOMAZELLA

Dr. VERA L TOMAZELLA

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2018 in Statistics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJeremias Leao
Jeremias Leao
Victor LeivaVictor Leiva
Victor Leiva
HSHelton Saulo
Helton Saulo
VERA L TOMAZELLAVERA L TOMAZELLA
VERA L TOMAZELLA

5 January 2017 in Biometrical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJeremias Leao
Jeremias Leao
Victor LeivaVictor Leiva
Victor Leiva
HSHelton Saulo
Helton Saulo
VERA L TOMAZELLAVERA L TOMAZELLA
VERA L TOMAZELLA

1 March 2017 in Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRicardo Rocha
Ricardo Rocha
SNSaralees Nadarajah
Saralees Nadarajah
VERA L TOMAZELLAVERA L TOMAZELLA
VERA L TOMAZELLA
Francisco  LouzadaFrancisco Louzada
Francisco Louzada

19 June 2015 in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRicardo Rocha
Ricardo Rocha
SNSaralees Nadarajah
Saralees Nadarajah
VERA L TOMAZELLAVERA L TOMAZELLA
VERA L TOMAZELLA
Francisco  LouzadaFrancisco Louzada
Francisco Louzada
AEAmanda Eudes
Amanda Eudes
An alternative to the standard mixture model is proposed for modeling data containing cured elements or a cure fraction. This approach is based on the use of defective distributions to estimate the cure fraction as a function of the estimated parameters. In the literature there are just two of these distributions: the Gompertz and the inverse Gaussian. Here, we propose two new defective distributions: the Kumaraswamy Gompertz and Kumaraswamy inverse Gaussian distributions, extensions of the Gompertz and inverse Gaussian distributions under the Kumaraswamy family of distributions. We show in fact that if a distribution is defective, then its extension under the Kumaraswamy family is defective too. We consider maximum likelihood estimation of the extensions and check its finite sample performance. We use three real cancer data sets to show that the new defective distributions offer better fits than baseline distributions.

18 July 2018 in Journal of Applied Statistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJuliana Scudilio
Juliana Scudilio
VCVinicius Calsavara
Vinicius Calsavara
RRRicardo Rocha
Ricardo Rocha
Francisco  LouzadaFrancisco Louzada
Francisco Louzada
VERA L TOMAZELLAVERA L TOMAZELLA
VERA L TOMAZELLA
Agatha RodriguesAgatha Rodrigues
Agatha Rodrigues
In this paper, we propose a defective model induced by a frailty term for modeling the proportion of cured. Unlike most of the cure rate models, defective models have advantage of modeling the cure rate without adding any extra parameter in model. The introduction of an unobserved heterogeneity among individuals has bring advantages for the estimated model. The influence of unobserved covariates is incorporated using a proportional hazard model. The frailty term assumed to follow a gamma distribution is introduced on the hazard rate to control the unobservable heterogeneity of the patients. We assume that the baseline distribution follows a Gompertz and inverse Gaussian defective distributions. Thus we propose and discuss two defective distributions: the defective gamma-Gompertz and gamma-inverse Gaussian regression models. Simulation studies are performed to verify the asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood estimator. Lastly, in order to illustrate the proposed model, we present three applications in real data sets, in which one of them we are using for the first time, related to a study about breast cancer in the A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.

14 March 2019 in Biometrical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VCVinicius Calsavara
Vinicius Calsavara
Agatha RodriguesAgatha Rodrigues
Agatha Rodrigues
RRRicardo Rocha
Ricardo Rocha
VERA L TOMAZELLAVERA L TOMAZELLA
VERA L TOMAZELLA
Francisco  LouzadaFrancisco Louzada
Francisco Louzada