Introduction: Periapical lesions of teeth are typically evaluated using periapical X-rays (PA) or cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT); however, ultrasound imaging (US) can also be used to detect bone defects. A comparative analysis is necessary to establish the diagnostic accuracy of US for the detection of periapical lesions in comparison with PA and CBCT. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the measurement precision of US against PA and CBCT in detecting periapical lesions. Methods: This study included 43 maxillary and mandibular teeth with periapical lesions. All teeth were examined clinically, radiographically, and ultrasonographically. Observers evaluated and measured the periapical lesions on CBCT, PA, and US images. Results: The comparison of lesion size showed that it differs significantly between the different methods of examination. A statistically significant difference was found between CBCT and US (mean difference = 0.99 mm, 95% CI [0.43–1.55]), as well as between CBCT and PA (mean difference = 0.61 mm, 95% CI [0.17–1.05]). No difference was found between the US and PA methods (p = 0.193). Conclusion: US cannot replace PA radiography in detecting pathologies but it can accurately measure and characterize periapical lesions with minimal radiation exposure. CBCT is the most precise and radiation-intensive method so it should only be used for complex cases.

Deproteinised bovine bone (DBB) is widely used as bone substitute in maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) surgery. No previous studies have shown the long-term volumetric changes in the augmented bone when using DBB. The selected patients had MFSA performed using a lateral window technique and a xenograft, alone or in combination with the patient’s autologous bone from the mandible. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were used to compare the volumetric changes in the augmented bone for patients over a period of 6 or more years. No significant bone reduction was seen in the augmented bone region when comparing MSFA after 7 months and 6 or more years after dental implantation.

Background: It is important to accurately determine the legal age at which a person is considered and treated as an adult; in many countries, it is 18. With the increasing migration flow to European countries, accurate age estimation methods must be implemented. In this study, the third molar maturity (I_3m) index and mandible condyle cortication stage were tested to distinguish adult from non-adult Latvian individuals using dental panoramic radiographs. Methods: This study included 716 selected dental panoramic radiographs of patients between the ages of 14 and 22. The lower-left third molar apical root parts were analyzed, and the I_3m index was calculated. In addition, the condyle cortication stage was evaluated. Results: All logistic regression models achieved statistically significant results (p < 0.001). The accuracy was high for all groups (males: 0.90, females: 0.87, both genders: 0.89), and the sensitivity was lower than the specificity, particularly for females (sensitivity: 0.55). The I_3m index appears to be a strong predictor across all models, while the mandibular condyle cortication stage plays a more nuanced role, depending on sex and the stage of condyle maturation. A higher I_3m index value (greater than the cut-off of 0.095 in males) indicates a higher likelihood of being classified as a non-adult male for this model; however, in females, a cut-off point higher than 0.150 indicated a higher likelihood of being classified as a non-adult female. The new proposed cut-off values need to be tested on a new sample. Conclusions: The I_3m index is a reliable age estimation tool, and a modified cut-off value could be determined for each gender in Latvian individuals. The condyle cortication stage is a weak tool for chronological age estimation in dental panoramic radiographs.

Background: Investigation of craniofacial growth and maturation, particularly of structures such as the spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) and mandibular condyle cortication (MCC), provides valuable insight into late adolescent development. These markers may serve as valuable tools in age assessment, especially in legal and forensic contexts, where accurate determination of the 18-year threshold is critical. In addition, understanding their maturation can support more accurate assessment of skeletal development and improve clinical decision-making in growth-related dental treatments. Methods: This retrospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the stage of SOS and MCC maturation on a group of 230 individuals aged 14–22 years. Data was acquired from the mid-sagittal and sagittal sections of CBCT images representing, respectively, the SOS and the condyles. MCC was assessed bilaterally using a three-type system (Types I–III), and SOS fusion was evaluated using a four-stage system (Stages 0–3). Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the association and correlation between the variables. Results: The Kruskal–Wallis test showed statistically significant differences in the age distribution of right and left MCC types, as well as SOS fusion stages (p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were found in age distributions between all four SOS fusion stages in the MCC Type II groups of both condyles in both sexes, as well as Type III groups of the right condyle in both sexes and the left condyle in females (p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were not observed in the MCC Type I group of the right and left condyle in both sexes and in the Type III group of the left condyle in males (p > 0.05). Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that the correlation between SOS fusion stages and MCC types was positive and statistically significant both between the parameters and with chronological age between sexes (r_s = 0.461–0.534, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study revealed a statistically significant association and correlation between the maturation of the SOS, the MCC and chronological age. Simultaneous MCC Type III and SOS Stage 3 maturation was predominantly observed in individuals aged 18 years or older, although a small number of cases were identified below this threshold. SOS fusion and MCC may serve as skeletal parameters for age assessment; thus, they could be used as an adjunct method in a multifactorial age assessment procedure.