Abdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan

Dr. Abdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan

Qassim University (QU)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAbdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
Abdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
JFJeffrey Friedman
Jeffrey Friedman
HPHaesuk Park
Haesuk Park
RSRichard Segal
Richard Segal
BBBabette A. Brumback
Babette A. Brumback
AHAbraham G. Hartzema
Abraham G. Hartzema

7 March 2020 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IAIbrahim Alharbi
Ibrahim Alharbi
HAHindi Alharbi
Hindi Alharbi
YAYasser Almogbel
Yasser Almogbel
AAAbdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
Abdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
AAAhmad Alhowail
Ahmad Alhowail
Doxorubicin (DOX) is widely used to treat many types of cancer; however, it is associated with chemotherapy-related complications such as cognitive dysfunction, known as chemobrain. Chemobrain affects up to 75% of cancer survivors, and there are currently no available therapeutic options. This study aims to examine whether metformin (MET) can protect against the neurotoxicity caused by DOX treatment. Forty male rats were divided into four groups (10 rats/group): control, DOX, DOX + MET, and MET. Rats treated with DOX received five doses of 4 mg/kg DOX weekly (cumulative dose: 20 mg/kg). For the DOX-MET and MET groups, MET (3 mg/mL) was dissolved in drinking water. Behavioral and glucose tests were performed one day after treatment was completed. We found DOX (4 mg/kg/week, 5 weeks) caused learning and memory impairment in the Y-maze, novel object recognition, and elevated plus maze behavioral tests. MET did not rescue these DOX-induced memory impairments. Neither DOX nor MET nor MET + DOX altered glucose levels following the treatment. In summary, DOX treatment is associated with memory impairment in rats, but MET does not rescue this cognitive dysfunction.

1 December 2023 in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZAZiyad Almalki
Ziyad Almalki
MIMohammad T Imam
Mohammad T Imam
NCNada F Abou Chahin
Nada F Abou Chahin
NANaheda S Alsammak
Naheda S Alsammak
SEShahad M Entabli
Shahad M Entabli
AAAhmad Alamer
Ahmad Alamer
Purpose: This study investigated the access to and disparities in telemedicine use among patients with chronic conditions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study of randomly selected primary healthcare centers was conducted to ensure that each of the 17 municipalities in Riyadh were represented. Three hundred and forty-two participants who completed the questionnaire were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. The relationship between demographic and socioeconomic factors and telemedicine utilization was evaluated using the chi-square test and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model. Results: Among the 342 participants, the study revealed that 25.73% of the patients utilized telemedicine. Older participants had lower odds of telemedicine use than did those aged ≤ 30 years [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.112, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.045– 0.279 for 50– 59 years; AOR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.076– 0.474 for 60– 69 years; AOR = 0.223, 95% CI = 0.092– 0.542 for ≥ 70 years]. Female sex (AOR = 2.519, 95% CI = 1.44– 4.408), having a higher education level (AOR = 3.434, 95% CI = 1.037– 7.041 for secondary education and AOR = 5.87, 95% CI = 2.761– 8.235 for higher education), and living in urban areas (AOR = 2.721, 95% CI = 1.184– 6.256) were associated with higher odds of telemedicine use. Among socioeconomic factors, employed participants had higher odds of telemedicine use (AOR = 4.336, 95% CI = 2.3– 8.174). Furthermore, compared to those with the highest socioeconomic status (SES) index, those with the lowest SES were less likely to use telemedicine than those with the highest SES index (AOR = 0.193, 95% CI = 0.055– 0.683 for the lower bottom (poorest). Conclusion: This study highlights a significant disparity in the utilization of telemedicine services across different populations, primarily due to demographic and socioeconomic factors.

26 April 2022 in Health Science Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAbdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
Abdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
JFJeffrey Friedman
Jeffrey Friedman
OAOsamah Alfayez
Osamah Alfayez
AHAbraham Hartzema
Abraham Hartzema
Background: Despite the increase in the number of bariatric surgeries performed, little is known about the impact of the surgery on drug absorption. Unpredictability is assumed with drugs, given the anatomical changes after surgery.Objective: To evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on drug absorption based on the type of procedure performed.Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review searching PubMed/Medline for published studies (from inception to December 2017) that evaluate the use of drugs and the assessment of drug absorption after bariatric surgery. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, case reports, and observational studies were included in our review.Results: We found 60 studies addressing drug use after bariatric surgery. Twenty‐eight studies reported a decrease in drug absorption after bariatric surgery while only four studies showed an increase in drug absorption. Unchanged absorption of drugs was seen in 23 studies after the surgery.Conclusion: The available information shows variations in drug absorption after bariatric surgery. The unpredictability may result from factors related to the patient, drug, and/or type of surgery. Therefore, pharmacists' involvement and close monitoring of patients after bariatric surgery could be effective to avoid sub‐/supratherapeutic responses.

1 April 2023 in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAli M. Aldayyen
Ali M. Aldayyen
MAMohammad A. Alwabari
Mohammad A. Alwabari
FAFatimah Alhaddad
Fatimah Alhaddad
MAMurtadha A. Alhumaid
Murtadha A. Alhumaid
NANaseem Alsuwailem
Naseem Alsuwailem
Ahmad AlamerAhmad Alamer
Ahmad Alamer
Medication errors (MEs) are a huge burden on any healthcare system and have been associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The medical literature reported heavily on MEs but lacked focus on analyzing high-risk medications such as antimicrobials. This was a retrospective analysis of the MEs database reported by the eastern region’s medical centers in Saudi Arabia from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. We used descriptive analysis to identify most common antimicrobials with errors, the stage of antimicrobial errors, type of the errors, contributing factors to the errors, and categories of errors based on the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC-MERP) classification of errors. A total of 1422 (22.1%) antimicrobial errors were identified out of 6412 MEs. Amoxicillin/Clavulanate (18%) was the most common antimicrobial reported in the database. Most errors occurred in the prescribing phase (87.6%) and included mainly incorrect doses (32.1%) and duplicate therapy (20.5%). In addition, most errors were identified as category B (72.5%). Finally, inexperienced personnel (57.9%) was the most cited contributing factor. This study revealed that antimicrobial errors occur primarily during prescription and that policy gaps and inexperienced staff were contributory factors. To improve, the focus should shift to physician education, clear dosing guidelines, efficient workload management, and implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs to promote appropriate antimicrobial use.

15 July 2022 in World Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAbdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
Abdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan
JFJeffrey Friedman
Jeffrey Friedman
HPHaesuk Park
Haesuk Park
RSRichard Segal
Richard Segal
BBBabette Brumback
Babette Brumback
AHAbraham Hartzema
Abraham Hartzema