Objective: To assess the significance of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Study Design: An immunohistochemical study in which 39 patients with LSCC were included. Methods: Immunohistochemical staining of the paraffin-embedded tumour tissues was performed using isoform-specific COX-2 polyclonal antisera (Santa Cruz, Calif., USA). COX-2 results were compared with the clinical parameters of the patients. Results: COX-2 was detected in all tumour tissues. In the normal laryngeal tissue around the tumour area, which served as control, there was no COX-2 staining. There was no relationship between the COX-2 results and the location of the primary tumour, T stage and N stage, survival, recurrence or pulmonary metastases. Conclusion: The absence of a relation between COX-2 positivity and clinical parameters may suggest an involvement of COX-2 in laryngeal carcinogenesis. Since COX-2 positivity could be detected in all LSCC specimens studied, COX-2 could serve as a therapeutic target in LSCC.

Background: Combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel has superior clinical efficacy than gemcitabine alone. Nevertheless, health-related quality of life. (QoL) associated with this combination therapy when administered at first-line in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma is unknown. Methods: A total of 125 patients were randomized to combination therapy (1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine + 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel) and single-agent gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) arms to take treatment weekly for 7 of 8 weeks, and following 3 of 4 weeks, until progression or severe toxicity. Primary endpoints were three-months of definitive deterioration free percent of patients, and QoL. Results: Overall QoL analyses showed that 34 and 58.3% of cases in gemcitabine and gemcitabine+nab-P arms had no deterioration in 3rd month QoL scores (p = 0.018). These proportions were 27.3 and 36.6% in 6^th month assessments, respectively (p = 0.357). Median overall survivals in combination and single-agent arms were 9.92 months and 5.95 months, respectively (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42–0.86, p = 0.038). Median progression free survivals in these treatment arms were 6.28 and 3.22 months, respectively (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39–0.87, p = 0.008). Median time-to-deterioration were 5.36 vs 3.68 months, and objective response rates were 37.1% vs 23.7% (p = 0.009), respectively in combination and single-agent arms. Conclusions: Combination therapy with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel had better overall and progression-free survival than gemcitabine alone. Also, combination therapy showed increased response rate without toxicity or deteriorated QoL. Combination treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel may provide significant benefit for advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial registration: This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03807999 on January 8, 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Background Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with limited responsiveness to standard therapies. We conducted a real-world, multicenter study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of two commonly used first-line chemotherapy regimens—doxorubicin–ifosfamide and gemcitabine–docetaxel—in patients with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Methods This retrospective cohort included 271 patients with advanced or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma treated between 2010 and 2023 across 30 centers in Turkey. Patients received either doxorubicin–ifosfamide (n = 142) or gemcitabine–docetaxel (n = 129) as first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, while survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and further analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models. Results Median overall survival was 19.7 months with doxorubicin–ifosfamide and 20.2 months with gemcitabine–docetaxel (P = .26). Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months with doxorubicin–ifosfamide and 7.0 months with gemcitabine–docetaxel (P = .62). The objective response rate was numerically higher with gemcitabine–docetaxel (35% vs. 26%), although not statistically significant (P = .11). Grade 3–4 neutropenia (16% vs. 12%) and febrile neutropenia (7% vs. 6%) were more frequent with doxorubicin–ifosfamide. Conclusions In this largest-to-date real-world cohort of metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma, doxorubicin–ifosfamide and gemcitabine–docetaxel demonstrated comparable survival outcomes. Gemcitabine–docetaxel, however, was associated with a more favorable hematologic safety profile. These findings support the clinical utility of both regimens while underscoring the need for prospective, biomarker-driven studies to refine treatment selection and improve personalization in this rare malignancy.

Background and Objectives: Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated less invasive methods for accurate staging. To investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US), mammography, and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Axillary involvement detected by US, mammography, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was analyzed in patients who underwent axillary dissection. Preoperatively, 365, 318, and 85 of 557 patients were evaluated with US, mammography, and PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of each imaging modality were calculated. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of US were 33.3%, 97.5%, 94.4%, 51.0%, and 57.8%, respectively. False-negative US findings were more frequent in T1 (84.6%) and N1 (76.3%) tumors (p < 0.001 for both). For mammography, these values were 12.9%, 97.74%, 88.89%, 44.67%, and 52.9%, while for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT they were 72.5%, 100%, 100%, 67.65%, and 82.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Ultrasound remains useful for evaluating axillary lymph node involvement in advanced breast cancer but is insufficient for early-stage disease.