Alyssa Leigh Faro

Dr. Alyssa Leigh Faro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 June 2026 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJacquelyn Raftery-Helmer
Jacquelyn Raftery-Helmer
AHAshley S. Hart
Ashley S. Hart
AFAlyssa Leigh Faro
Alyssa Leigh Faro
DBDiana Carolina Baez
Diana Carolina Baez
PMPhoebe Moore
Phoebe Moore
Background/Objectives: Incorporating parent training into cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxious youth has not been shown to significantly improve outcomes perhaps because these interventions have not addressed potential interfering psychological barriers to implementing parenting changes and rarely offer between-session support. There is growing evidence that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) can target these psychological barriers and generate more flexible and adaptive behavioral repertoires in parents of children with a variety of presenting challenges. Methods: Following a pilot trial of “Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Parents of Anxious Children (ACT-PAC)” a six-week group-based intervention focused on targeting psychological barriers to parenting change using mindfulness and acceptance approaches, we collected qualitative feedback from participants in two post-treatment phases by conducting individual interviews and a focus group with participants that completed the intervention. Results: Analysis of interview responses revealed that parents found ACT principles and processes to be helpful, and many also appreciated the ACT-PAC group setting that allowed parents to recognize their experiences were shared by others and to self-disclose in a non-judgmental space. Feedback from the focus group further provides preliminary evidence that ACT-PAC is acceptable to and feasible for parent participants and suggests modifications such as involving additional caregivers, making resources more readily available, and creative structural changes that may facilitate between-session practice. Conclusions: Results suggest that the group-based intervention can be both maintained and improved for future participants. Limitations to generalizability in light of possible selection bias and the small focus group sample size are addressed.

15 April 2025 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAlyssa Leigh Faro
Alyssa Leigh Faro
RWRebecca Wolenski
Rebecca Wolenski
CLChun Wing Lee
Chun Wing Lee
PGPerihan Esra Esra Guvenek-Cokol
Perihan Esra Esra Guvenek-Cokol
DDDaniel P. Dickstein
Daniel P. Dickstein
MFMaria Fraire
Maria Fraire
Background/Objectives: Residential treatment represents an important level of care for adolescents with severe and/or treatment-refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Despite accumulating evidence supporting the treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness of insurance-based intensive OCD treatment in residential settings, few data exist that characterize the population of adolescent patients utilizing this level of care. As a result, residential treatment may be poorly understood by patients, their families, and referring providers, which may delay appropriate treatment for adolescents with OCD. Here, we characterize the patient population at an intensive residential treatment center (RTC) and partial hospitalization program (PHP) for adolescents (Mage = 15.23) with a primary diagnosis of OCD. Methods: We examine quantitative data collected from 168 adolescents admitted to the McLean OCD Institute for Children and Adolescents for the treatment of primary OCD or a related disorder over a three-year period. We also conduct analyses on a subset of patients (n = 120) who participated in the Child and Adolescent Routine Evaluation (CARE) Initiative (McLean Child Division-Wide Measurement-Based Care Program) to further characterize this patient population with a lens toward additional comorbidities and factors impacting prognosis. Results: The current paper describes the severity of symptom presentation, comorbidities, psychotropic medication profiles, and disruption to personal and family functioning. Analyses also include the prevalence of OCD subtypes and co-occurrence among varied presentations. Conclusions: In addition to identifying common clinical presentations in an RTC/PHP, this paper further aims to detail best practices and clinical rationale guiding a specialty RTC/PHP to inform families, providers, and payors about the individuals that most benefit from this level of care.