Conduct problems and anxiety symptoms commonly co-occur among youths with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD); however, how these symptoms influence functioning and treatment outcomes remains unclear. This study examined subtypes based on these co-occurring symptoms in a clinical sample of 134 youths (M_age = 9.67, 36.6% female, 83.6% white) with ODD and the predictive power of these subgroups for youth functioning and psychosocial treatment outcomes. The latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups based on parent- and self-reported conduct problems and anxiety symptoms. Differences among the subgroups in clinician-, parent-, and/or self-reported accounts of symptom severity, school performance, underlying processing known to be impaired across ODD, conduct and anxiety disorders, self-concept, and psychosocial treatment outcomes were examined. Four distinct profiles were identified: (1) Low Anxiety/Moderate Conduct Problems (n = 42); (2) High Anxiety/Moderate Conduct Problems (n = 33); (3) Moderate Anxiety/Moderate Conduct Problems (n = 40); and (4) Moderate Anxiety/High Conduct Problems (n = 19). The Moderate Anxiety/High Conduct Problems group exhibited more severe behavioral problems, greater difficulties with negative emotionality, emotional self-control, and executive functioning; they also demonstrated worse long-term treatment outcomes than the other subgroups. These findings suggest more homogeneous subgroups within and across diagnostic categories may result in a deeper understanding of ODD and could inform nosological systems and intervention efforts.

Background/Objectives: Residential treatment represents an important level of care for adolescents with severe and/or treatment-refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Despite accumulating evidence supporting the treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness of insurance-based intensive OCD treatment in residential settings, few data exist that characterize the population of adolescent patients utilizing this level of care. As a result, residential treatment may be poorly understood by patients, their families, and referring providers, which may delay appropriate treatment for adolescents with OCD. Here, we characterize the patient population at an intensive residential treatment center (RTC) and partial hospitalization program (PHP) for adolescents (Mage = 15.23) with a primary diagnosis of OCD. Methods: We examine quantitative data collected from 168 adolescents admitted to the McLean OCD Institute for Children and Adolescents for the treatment of primary OCD or a related disorder over a three-year period. We also conduct analyses on a subset of patients (n = 120) who participated in the Child and Adolescent Routine Evaluation (CARE) Initiative (McLean Child Division-Wide Measurement-Based Care Program) to further characterize this patient population with a lens toward additional comorbidities and factors impacting prognosis. Results: The current paper describes the severity of symptom presentation, comorbidities, psychotropic medication profiles, and disruption to personal and family functioning. Analyses also include the prevalence of OCD subtypes and co-occurrence among varied presentations. Conclusions: In addition to identifying common clinical presentations in an RTC/PHP, this paper further aims to detail best practices and clinical rationale guiding a specialty RTC/PHP to inform families, providers, and payors about the individuals that most benefit from this level of care.