Anuraj Uthayasooriyan

Mr. Anuraj Uthayasooriyan

School of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 June 2024 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anuraj UthayasooriyanAnuraj Uthayasooriyan
Anuraj Uthayasooriyan
Fernando Vanegas AlvarezFernando Vanegas Alvarez
Fernando Vanegas Alvarez
AJAmir Jalali
Amir Jalali
KDKrishna Manaswi Digumarti
Krishna Manaswi Digumarti
Farrokh Janabi-SharifiFarrokh Janabi-Sharifi
Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi
FGFelipe Gonzalez
Felipe Gonzalez
Aerial manipulators have seen a rapid uptake for multiple applications, including inspection tasks and aerial robot–human interaction in building and construction. Whilst single degree of freedom (DoF) and multiple DoF rigid link manipulators (RLMs) have been extensively discussed in the aerial manipulation literature, continuum manipulators (CMs), often referred to as continuum robots (CRs), have not received the same attention. This survey seeks to summarise the existing works on continuum manipulator-based aerial manipulation research and the most prevalent designs of continuous backbone tendon-driven continuum robots (TDCRs) and multi-link backbone TDCRs, thereby providing a structured set of guidelines for fabricating continuum robots for aerial manipulation. With a history spanning over three decades, dominated by medical applications, CRs are now increasingly being used in other domains like industrial machinery and system inspection, also gaining popularity in aerial manipulation. Fuelled by diverse applications and their associated challenges, researchers have proposed a plethora of design solutions, primarily falling within the realms of concentric tube (CT) designs or tendon-driven designs. Leveraging research works published in the past decade, we place emphasis on the preparation of backbones, support structures, tendons, stiffness control, test procedures, and error considerations. We also present our perspectives and recommendations addressing essential design and fabrication aspects of TDCRs in the context of aerial manipulation, and provide valuable guidance for future research and development endeavours in this dynamic field.

28 November 2025 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pirunthan KeerthinathanPirunthan Keerthinathan
Pirunthan Keerthinathan
Juan SandinoJuan Sandino
Juan Sandino
SMSutharsan Mahendren
Sutharsan Mahendren
Anuraj UthayasooriyanAnuraj Uthayasooriyan
Anuraj Uthayasooriyan
Julian Galvez-SernaJulian Galvez-Serna
Julian Galvez-Serna
FGFelipe Gonzalez
Felipe Gonzalez
Uncrewed aerial systems (UAS)-based remote sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) analysis enable real-time wildfire or bushfire detection, facilitating early response to minimize damage and protect lives and property. However, their effectiveness is limited by three issues: distinguishing smoke from fog, the high cost of manual annotation, and the computational demands of large models. This study addresses the three key challenges by introducing plume as a new indicator to better distinguish smoke from similar visual elements, and by employing a hybrid annotation method using knowledge distillation (KD) to reduce expert labour and accelerate labelling. Additionally, it leverages lightweight YOLO Nano models trained with pseudo-labels generated from a fine-tuned teacher network to lower computational demands while maintaining high detection accuracy for real-time wildfire monitoring. Controlled pile burns in Canungra, QLD, Australia, were conducted to collect UAS-captured images over deciduous vegetation, which were subsequently augmented with the Flame2 dataset, which contains wildfire images of coniferous vegetation. A Grounding DINO model, fine-tuned using few-shot learning, served as the teacher network to generate pseudo-labels for a significant portion of the Flame2 dataset. These pseudo-labels were then used to train student networks consisting of YOLO Nano architectures, specifically versions 5, 8, and 11 (YOLOv5n, YOLOv8n, YOLOv11n). The experimental results show that YOLOv8n and YOLOv5n achieved an mAP@0.5 of 0.721. Plume detection outperforms smoke indicators (F1: 76.1–85.7% vs. 70%) in fog and wildfire scenarios. These findings underscore the value of incorporating plume as a distinct class and utilizing KD, both of which enhance detection accuracy and scalability, ultimately supporting more reliable and timelier wildfire monitoring and response.

1 January 2026 in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anuraj UthayasooriyanAnuraj Uthayasooriyan
Anuraj Uthayasooriyan
KDKrishna Manaswi Digumarti
Krishna Manaswi Digumarti
Fernando Vanegas AlvarezFernando Vanegas Alvarez
Fernando Vanegas Alvarez
FGFelipe Gonzalez
Felipe Gonzalez