Russell A. Poldrack

Russell A. Poldrack

Top Cited Scholar 2026
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Russell A. Poldrack

Department of Psychology, Stanford University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 December 2018 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OEOscar Esteban
Oscar Esteban
CMChristopher J. Markiewicz
Christopher J. Markiewicz
RBRoss W. Blair
Ross W. Blair
CMCraig A. Moodie
Craig A. Moodie
AIA. Ilkay Isik
A. Ilkay Isik
KGKrzysztof Gorgolewski
Krzysztof Gorgolewski

26 June 2011 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TYTal Yarkoni
Tal Yarkoni
RPRussell A Poldrack
Russell A Poldrack
TNThomas E Nichols
Thomas E Nichols
DEDavid C Van Essen
David C Van Essen
TWTor D Wager
Tor D Wager
A framework and web interface for the large-scale and automated synthesis of human neuroimaging data extracted from the literature is presented. It is used to generate a large database of mappings between neural and cognitive states and to address long-standing inferential problems in the neuroimaging literature. The rapid growth of the literature on neuroimaging in humans has led to major advances in our understanding of human brain function but has also made it increasingly difficult to aggregate and synthesize neuroimaging findings. Here we describe and validate an automated brain-mapping framework that uses text-mining, meta-analysis and machine-learning techniques to generate a large database of mappings between neural and cognitive states. We show that our approach can be used to automatically conduct large-scale, high-quality neuroimaging meta-analyses, address long-standing inferential problems in the neuroimaging literature and support accurate 'decoding' of broad cognitive states from brain activity in both entire studies and individual human subjects. Collectively, our results have validated a powerful and generative framework for synthesizing human neuroimaging data on an unprecedented scale.

21 June 2016 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKrzysztof Gorgolewski
Krzysztof Gorgolewski
TATibor Auer
Tibor Auer
VCVince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun
RCR. Cameron Craddock
R. Cameron Craddock
SDSamir Das
Samir Das
RPRussell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack
The development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques has defined modern neuroimaging. Since its inception, tens of thousands of studies using techniques such as functional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging have allowed for the non-invasive study of the brain. Despite the fact that MRI is routinely used to obtain data for neuroscience research, there has been no widely adopted standard for organizing and describing the data collected in an imaging experiment. This renders sharing and reusing data (within or between labs) difficult if not impossible and unnecessarily complicates the application of automatic pipelines and quality assurance protocols. To solve this problem, we have developed the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), a standard for organizing and describing MRI datasets. The BIDS standard uses file formats compatible with existing software, unifies the majority of practices already common in the field, and captures the metadata necessary for most common data processing operations.

1 April 2014 in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAdam R. Aron
Adam R. Aron
TRTrevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins
RPRussell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack

1 October 2013 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDeanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch
GBGregory C. Burgess
Gregory C. Burgess
MHMichael P. Harms
Michael P. Harms
SPSteven E. Petersen
Steven E. Petersen
BSBradley L. Schlaggar
Bradley L. Schlaggar
DEDavid C. Van Essen
David C. Van Essen

5 January 2017 in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRussell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack
CBChris I. Baker
Chris I. Baker
JDJoke Durnez
Joke Durnez
KGKrzysztof J. Gorgolewski
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski
PMPaul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews
TYTal Yarkoni
Tal Yarkoni
There is growing concern about the reproducibility of scientific research, and neuroimaging research suffers from many features that are thought to lead to high levels of false results. Statistical power of neuroimaging studies has increased over time but remains relatively low, especially for group comparison studies. An analysis of effect sizes in the Human Connectome Project demonstrates that most functional MRI studies are not sufficiently powered to find reasonable effect sizes. Neuroimaging analysis has a high degree of flexibility in analysis methods, which can lead to inflated false-positive rates unless controlled for. Pre-registration of analysis plans and clear delineation of hypothesis-driven and exploratory research are potential solutions to this problem. The use of appropriate corrections for multiple tests has increased, but some common methods can have highly inflated false-positive rates. The use of non-parametric methods is encouraged to provide accurate correction for multiple tests. Software errors have the potential to lead to incorrect or irreproducible results. The adoption of improved software engineering methods and software testing strategies can help to reduce such problems. Reproducibility will be improved through greater transparency in methods reporting and through increased sharing of data and code.