Ayse Ilkay Isik

Ayse Ilkay Isik

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Ayse Ilkay Isik

Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 December 2018 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OEOscar Esteban
Oscar Esteban
CMChristopher J. Markiewicz
Christopher J. Markiewicz
RBRoss W. Blair
Ross W. Blair
CMCraig A. Moodie
Craig A. Moodie
AIA. Ilkay Isik
A. Ilkay Isik
KGKrzysztof Gorgolewski
Krzysztof Gorgolewski

20 May 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRotem Botvinik-Nezer
Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
FHFelix Holzmeister
Felix Holzmeister
CCColin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer
ADAnna Dreber
Anna Dreber
JHJuergen Huber
Juergen Huber
TSTom Schonberg
Tom Schonberg

4 September 2019 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EVEdward A Vessel
Edward A Vessel
AIAyse Ilkay Isik
Ayse Ilkay Isik
ABAmy M. Belfi
Amy M. Belfi
JSJonathan L. Stahl
Jonathan L. Stahl
GSG. Gabrielle Starr
G. Gabrielle Starr
Visual aesthetic evaluations, which impact decision-making and well-being, recruit the ventral visual pathway, subcortical reward circuitry, and parts of the medial prefrontal cortex overlapping with the default-mode network (DMN). However, it is unknown whether these networks represent aesthetic appeal in a domain-general fashion, independent of domain-specific representations of stimulus content (artworks versus architecture or natural landscapes). Using a classification approach, we tested whether the DMN or ventral occipitotemporal cortex (VOT) contains a domain-general representation of aesthetic appeal. Classifiers were trained on multivoxel functional MRI response patterns collected while observers made aesthetic judgments about images from one aesthetic domain. Classifier performance (high vs. low aesthetic appeal) was then tested on response patterns from held-out trials from the same domain to derive a measure of domain-specific coding, or from a different domain to derive a measure of domain-general coding. Activity patterns in category-selective VOT contained a degree of domain-specific information about aesthetic appeal, but did not generalize across domains. Activity patterns from the DMN, however, were predictive of aesthetic appeal across domains. Importantly, the ability to predict aesthetic appeal varied systematically; predictions were better for observers who gave more extreme ratings to images subsequently labeled as “high” or “low.” These findings support a model of aesthetic appreciation whereby domain-specific representations of the content of visual experiences in VOT feed in to a “core” domain-general representation of visual aesthetic appeal in the DMN. Whole-brain “searchlight” analyses identified additional prefrontal regions containing information relevant for appreciation of cultural artifacts (artwork and architecture) but not landscapes.

10 December 2018 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAmy M. Belfi
Amy M. Belfi
EVEdward A Vessel
Edward A Vessel
ABAenne Brielmann
Aenne Brielmann
AIAyse Ilkay Isik
Ayse Ilkay Isik
ACAnjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee
GSG. Gabrielle Starr
G. Gabrielle Starr

25 April 2018 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
OEOscar Esteban
Oscar Esteban
CMChristopher J. Markiewicz
Christopher J. Markiewicz
RBRoss W. Blair
Ross W. Blair
CMCraig A. Moodie
Craig A. Moodie
AIA. Ilkay Isik
A. Ilkay Isik
KGKrzysztof Gorgolewski
Krzysztof Gorgolewski
Preprocessing of functional MRI (fMRI) involves numerous steps to clean and standardize data before statistical analysis. Generally, researchers create ad hoc preprocessing workflows for each new dataset, building upon a large inventory of tools available for each step. The complexity of these workflows has snowballed with rapid advances in MR data acquisition and image processing techniques. We introduce fMRIPrep , an analysis-agnostic tool that addresses the challenge of robust and reproducible preprocessing for task-based and resting fMRI data. FMRIPrep automatically adapts a best-in-breed workflow to the idiosyncrasies of virtually any dataset, ensuring high-quality preprocessing with no manual intervention. By introducing visual assessment checkpoints into an iterative integration framework for software-testing, we show that fMRIPrep robustly produces high-quality results on a diverse fMRI data collection comprising participants from 54 different studies in the OpenfMRI repository. We review the distinctive features of fMRIPrep in a qualitative comparison to other preprocessing workflows. We demonstrate that fMRIPrep achieves higher spatial accuracy as it introduces less uncontrolled spatial smoothness than commonly used preprocessing tools. FMRIPrep has the potential to transform fMRI research by equipping neuroscientists with a high-quality, robust, easy-to-use and transparent preprocessing workflow which can help ensure the validity of inference and the interpretability of their results.

21 July 2021 in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AIAyse Ilkay Isik
Ayse Ilkay Isik
EVEdward A. Vessel
Edward A. Vessel
During aesthetically appealing visual experiences, visual content provides a basis for computation of affectively tinged representations of aesthetic value. How this happens in the brain is largely unexplored. Using engaging video clips of natural landscapes, we tested whether cortical regions that respond to perceptual aspects of an environment (e.g., spatial layout, object content and motion) were directly modulated by rated aesthetic appeal. Twenty-four participants watched a series of videos of natural landscapes while being scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and reported both continuous ratings of enjoyment (during the videos) and overall aesthetic judgments (after each video). Although landscape videos engaged a greater expanse of high-level visual cortex compared to that observed for images of landscapes, independently localized category-selective visual regions (e.g., scene-selective parahippocampal place area and motion-selective hMT+) were not significantly modulated by aesthetic appeal. Rather, a whole-brain analysis revealed modulations by aesthetic appeal in ventral (collateral sulcus) and lateral (middle occipital sulcus, posterior middle temporal gyrus) clusters that were adjacent to scene and motion selective regions. These findings suggest that aesthetic appealper seis not represented in well-characterized feature- and category-selective regions of visual cortex. Rather, we propose that the observed activations reflect a local transformation from a feature-based visual representation to a representation of “elemental affect,” computed through information-processing mechanisms that detect deviations from an observer’s expectations. Furthermore, we found modulation by aesthetic appeal in subcortical reward structures but not in regions of the default-mode network (DMN) nor orbitofrontal cortex, and only weak evidence for associated changes in functional connectivity. In contrast to other visual aesthetic domains, aesthetically appealing interactions with natural landscapes may rely more heavily on comparisons between ongoing stimulation and well-formed representations of the natural world, and less on top-down processes for resolving ambiguities or assessing self-relevance.