Christopher W. Fernandez

Christopher W. Fernandez

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Christopher W. Fernandez

Department of Biology Syracuse University Syracuse NY 13210 USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 March 2015 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMM. Luke McCormack
M. Luke McCormack
IDIan A. Dickie
Ian A. Dickie
DEDavid M. Eissenstat
David M. Eissenstat
TFTimothy J. Fahey
Timothy J. Fahey
CFChristopher W. Fernandez
Christopher W. Fernandez
MZMarcin Zadworny
Marcin Zadworny
Summary: Fine roots acquire essential soil resources and mediate biogeochemical cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Estimates of carbon and nutrient allocation to build and maintain these structures remain uncertain because of the challenges of consistently measuring and interpreting fine‐root systems. Traditionally, fine roots have been defined as all roots ≤ 2 mm in diameter, yet it is now recognized that this approach fails to capture the diversity of form and function observed among fine‐root orders. Here, we demonstrate how order‐based and functional classification frameworks improve our understanding of dynamic root processes in ecosystems dominated by perennial plants. In these frameworks, fine roots are either separated into individual root orders or functionally defined into a shorter‐lived absorptive pool and a longer‐lived transport fine‐root pool. Using these frameworks, we estimate that fine‐root production and turnover represent 22% of terrestrial net primary production globally – a c. 30% reduction from previous estimates assuming a single fine‐root pool. Future work developing tools to rapidly differentiate functional fine‐root classes, explicit incorporation of mycorrhizal fungi into fine‐root studies, and wider adoption of a two‐pool approach to model fine roots provide opportunities to better understand below‐ground processes in the terrestrial biosphere. Contents Summary 505 I. Introduction 506 II. Ordered variation in fine‐root traits – different functions of different roots 506 III. Pitfalls and platforms – understanding bias and improving estimates of root processes 508 IV. Moving forward using root orders and functional classifications 512 V. Can we integrate mycorrhizal fungi with root classifications? 513 VI. Conclusions and recommendations 514 Acknowledgements 515 References 515

14 September 2015 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CFChristopher W. Fernandez
Christopher W. Fernandez
PKPeter G. Kennedy
Peter G. Kennedy

1 February 2016 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CFChristopher W. Fernandez
Christopher W. Fernandez
JLJ. Adam Langley
J. Adam Langley
SCSamantha Chapman
Samantha Chapman
MMM. Luke McCormack
M. Luke McCormack
RKRoger T. Koide
Roger T. Koide

13 March 2017 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMM. Luke McCormack
M. Luke McCormack
DGDali Guo
Dali Guo
CIColleen M. Iversen
Colleen M. Iversen
WCWeile Chen
Weile Chen
DEDavid M. Eissenstat
David M. Eissenstat
AZAmy Zanne
Amy Zanne
Summary: Trait‐based approaches provide a useful framework to investigate plant strategies for resource acquisition, growth, and competition, as well as plant impacts on ecosystem processes. Despite significant progress capturing trait variation within and among stems and leaves, identification of trait syndromes within fine‐root systems and between fine roots and other plant organs is limited. Here we discuss three underappreciated areas where focused measurements of fine‐root traits can make significant contributions to ecosystem science. These include assessment of spatiotemporal variation in fine‐root traits, integration of mycorrhizal fungi into fine‐root‐trait frameworks, and the need for improved scaling of traits measured on individual roots to ecosystem‐level processes. Progress in each of these areas is providing opportunities to revisit how below‐ground processes are represented in terrestrial biosphere models. Targeted measurements of fine‐root traits with clear linkages to ecosystem processes and plant responses to environmental change are strongly needed to reduce empirical and model uncertainties. Further identifying how and when suites of root and whole‐plant traits are coordinated or decoupled will ultimately provide a powerful tool for modeling plant form and function at local and global scales.

3 October 2013 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRoger T. Koide
Roger T. Koide
CFChristopher Fernandez
Christopher Fernandez
GMGlenna Malcolm
Glenna Malcolm
Summary: There is a growing interest amongst community ecologists in functional traits. Response traits determine membership in communities. Effect traits influence ecosystem function. One goal of community ecology is to predict the effect of environmental change on ecosystem function. Environmental change can directly and indirectly affect ecosystem function. Indirect effects are mediated through shifts in community structure. It is difficult to predict how environmental change will affect ecosystem function via the indirect route when the change in effect trait distribution is not predictable from the change in response trait distribution. When response traits function as effect traits, however, it becomes possible to predict the indirect effect of environmental change on ecosystem function. Here we illustrate four examples in which key attributes of ectomycorrhizal fungi function as both response and effect traits. While plant ecologists have discussed response and effect traits in the context of community structuring and ecosystem function, this approach has not been applied to ectomycorrhizal fungi. This is unfortunate because of the large effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on ecosystem function. We hope to stimulate further research in this area in the hope of better predicting the ecosystem‐ and landscape‐level effects of the fungi as influenced by changing environmental conditions.

13 January 2019 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DZDonald R. Zak
Donald R. Zak
PPPeter T. Pellitier
Peter T. Pellitier
WAWilliam A. Argiroff
William A. Argiroff
BCBuck Castillo
Buck Castillo
TJTimothy Y. James
Timothy Y. James
ATAnders Tunlid
Anders Tunlid
Summary: The extent to which ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi enable plants to access organic nitrogen (N) bound in soil organic matter (SOM) and transfer this growth‐limiting nutrient to their plant host, has important implications for our understanding of plant–fungal interactions, and the cycling and storage of carbon (C) and N in terrestrial ecosystems. Empirical evidence currently supports a range of perspectives, suggesting that ECM vary in their ability to provide their host with N bound in SOM, and that this capacity can both positively and negatively influence soil C storage. To help resolve the multiplicity of observations, we gathered a group of researchers to explore the role of ECM fungi in soil C dynamics, and propose new directions that hold promise to resolve competing hypotheses and contrasting observations. In this Viewpoint, we summarize these deliberations and identify areas of inquiry that hold promise for increasing our understanding of these fundamental and widespread plant symbionts and their role in ecosystem‐level biogeochemistry.