Joanne B. Emerson

Joanne B. Emerson

Top Cited Scholar 2026
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Joanne B. Emerson

University of California, Davis

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 February 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJennifer M. Brulc
Jennifer M. Brulc
DADionysios A. Antonopoulos
Dionysios A. Antonopoulos
MMMargret E. Berg Miller
Margret E. Berg Miller
MWMelissa K. Wilson
Melissa K. Wilson
AYAnthony C. Yannarell
Anthony C. Yannarell
BWBryan A. White
Bryan A. White
The complex microbiome of the rumen functions as an effective system for the conversion of plant cell wall biomass to microbial protein, short chain fatty acids, and gases. As such, it provides a unique genetic resource for plant cell wall degrading microbial enzymes that could be used in the production of biofuels. The rumen and gastrointestinal tract harbor a dense and complex microbiome. To gain a greater understanding of the ecology and metabolic potential of this microbiome, we used comparative metagenomics (phylotype analysis and SEED subsystems-based annotations) to examine randomly sampled pyrosequence data from 3 fiber-adherent microbiomes and 1 pooled liquid sample (a mixture of the liquid microbiome fractions from the same bovine rumens). Even though the 3 animals were fed the same diet, the community structure, predicted phylotype, and metabolic potentials in the rumen were markedly different with respect to nutrient utilization. A comparison of the glycoside hydrolase and cellulosome functional genes revealed that in the rumen microbiome, initial colonization of fiber appears to be by organisms possessing enzymes that attack the easily available side chains of complex plant polysaccharides and not the more recalcitrant main chains, especially cellulose. Furthermore, when compared with the termite hindgut microbiome, there are fundamental differences in the glycoside hydrolase content that appear to be diet driven for either the bovine rumen (forages and legumes) or the termite hindgut (wood).

16 July 2018 in Nature Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJoanne B. Emerson
Joanne B. Emerson
SRSimon Roux
Simon Roux
JBJennifer R. Brum
Jennifer R. Brum
BBBenjamin Bolduc
Benjamin Bolduc
BWBen J. Woodcroft
Ben J. Woodcroft
MSMatthew B Sullivan
Matthew B Sullivan
Climate change threatens to release abundant carbon that is sequestered at high latitudes, but the constraints on microbial metabolisms that mediate the release of methane and carbon dioxide are poorly understood1–7. The role of viruses, which are known to affect microbial dynamics, metabolism and biogeochemistry in the oceans8–10, remains largely unexplored in soil. Here, we aimed to investigate how viruses influence microbial ecology and carbon metabolism in peatland soils along a permafrost thaw gradient in Sweden. We recovered 1,907 viral populations (genomes and large genome fragments) from 197 bulk soil and size-fractionated metagenomes, 58% of which were detected in metatranscriptomes and presumed to be active. In silico predictions linked 35% of the viruses to microbial host populations, highlighting likely viral predators of key carbon-cycling microorganisms, including methanogens and methanotrophs. Lineage-specific virus/host ratios varied, suggesting that viral infection dynamics may differentially impact microbial responses to a changing climate. Virus-encoded glycoside hydrolases, including an endomannanase with confirmed functional activity, indicated that viruses influence complex carbon degradation and that viral abundances were significant predictors of methane dynamics. These findings suggest that viruses may impact ecosystem function in climate-critical, terrestrial habitats and identify multiple potential viral contributions to soil carbon cycling.

25 March 2010 in The ISME Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElisabeth Bik
Elisabeth Bik
CLClara Davis Long
Clara Davis Long
GAGary C Armitage
Gary C Armitage
PLPeter Loomer
Peter Loomer
JEJoanne Emerson
Joanne Emerson
DRDavid A Relman
David A Relman
The composition of the oral microbiota from 10 individuals with healthy oral tissues was determined using culture-independent techniques. From each individual, 26 specimens, each from different oral sites at a single point in time, were collected and pooled. An 11th pool was constructed using portions of the subgingival specimens from all 10 individuals. The 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified using broad-range bacterial primers, and clone libraries from the individual and subgingival pools were constructed. From a total of 11 368 high-quality, nonchimeric, near full-length sequences, 247 species-level phylotypes (using a 99% sequence identity threshold) and 9 bacterial phyla were identified. At least 15 bacterial genera were conserved among all 10 individuals, with significant interindividual differences at the species and strain level. Comparisons of these oral bacterial sequences with near full-length sequences found previously in the large intestines and feces of other healthy individuals suggest that the mouth and intestinal tract harbor distinct sets of bacteria. Co-occurrence analysis showed significant segregation of taxa when community membership was examined at the level of genus, but not at the level of species, suggesting that ecologically significant, competitive interactions are more apparent at a broader taxonomic level than species. This study is one of the more comprehensive, high-resolution analyses of bacterial diversity within the healthy human mouth to date, and highlights the value of tools from macroecology for enhancing our understanding of bacterial ecology in human health.

16 August 2017 in Microbiome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJoanne B. Emerson
Joanne B. Emerson
RARachel I. Adams
Rachel I. Adams
CRClarisse M. Betancourt Román
Clarisse M. Betancourt Román
BBBrandon Brooks
Brandon Brooks
DCDavid A. Coil
David A. Coil
LRLynn J. Rothschild
Lynn J. Rothschild
While often obvious for macroscopic organisms, determining whether a microbe is dead or alive is fraught with complications. Fields such as microbial ecology, environmental health, and medical microbiology each determine how best to assess which members of the microbial community are alive, according to their respective scientific and/or regulatory needs. Many of these fields have gone from studying communities on a bulk level to the fine-scale resolution of microbial populations within consortia. For example, advances in nucleic acid sequencing technologies and downstream bioinformatic analyses have allowed for high-resolution insight into microbial community composition and metabolic potential, yet we know very little about whether such community DNA sequences represent viable microorganisms. In this review, we describe a number of techniques, from microscopy- to molecular-based, that have been used to test for viability (live/dead determination) and/or activity in various contexts, including newer techniques that are compatible with or complementary to downstream nucleic acid sequencing. We describe the compatibility of these viability assessments with high-throughput quantification techniques, including flow cytometry and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although bacterial viability-linked community characterizations are now feasible in many environments and thus are the focus of this critical review, further methods development is needed for complex environmental samples and to more fully capture the diversity of microbes (e.g., eukaryotic microbes and viruses) and metabolic states (e.g., spores) of microbes in natural environments.

16 July 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BWBen J. Woodcroft
Ben J. Woodcroft
CSCaitlin M. Singleton
Caitlin M. Singleton
JBJoel A. Boyd
Joel A. Boyd
PEPaul N. Evans
Paul N. Evans
JEJoanne B. Emerson
Joanne B. Emerson
GTGene W. Tyson
Gene W. Tyson

1 October 2013 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRobert M. Bowers
Robert M. Bowers
NCNicholas Clements
Nicholas Clements
JEJoanne B. Emerson
Joanne B. Emerson
CWChristine Wiedinmyer
Christine Wiedinmyer
Michael HanniganMichael Hannigan
Michael Hannigan
NFNoah Fierer
Noah Fierer